Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Gudeman

dblp:08/4819 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Programming languages and type systems · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › dynamic languages
dynamically typed languages
0.011994
Call Forwarding: A Simple Interprocedural Optimization Technique for Dynamically Typed Languages · POPL 1994
Compilers and program optimization
interprocedural optimization
0.011994
Call Forwarding: A Simple Interprocedural Optimization Technique for Dynamically Typed Languages · POPL 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

greedy algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Output Value Placement in Moded Logic Programs
Peter A. Bigot, David Gudeman, Saumya K. Debray
ICLP2
1994 Call Forwarding: A Simple Interprocedural Optimization Technique for Dynamically Typed Languages
abstract
This paper discusses call forwarding, a simple interprocedural optimization technique for dynamically typed languages. The basic idea behind the optimization is straightforward: find an ordering for the “entry actions” of a procedure, and generate multiple entry points for the procedure, so as to maximize the savings realized from different call sites bypassing different sets of entry actions. We show that the problem of computing optimal solutions to arbitrary call forwarding problems is NP-complete, and describe an efficient greedy algorithm for the problem. Experimental results indicate that (i) this algorithm is effective, in that the solutions produced are generally close to optimal; and (ii) the resulting optimization leads to significant performance improvements for a number of benchmarks tested.
Koen De Bosschere, Saumya K. Debray, David Gudeman, Sampath Kannan
POPL3