Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laurent Maillet-Contoz
dblp:08/558
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Theory of computation · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 88% Integrated circuit design · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
system-level design |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation › system-level design › high-level system modeling
transaction-level modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007 |
Integrated circuit design
system-on-chip |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systemc · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Use of Architecture Description to Maintain Consistency in Agile Processes
Aurélien Chichignoud, Florian Noyrit, Laurent Maillet-Contoz, François Terrier |
MODELSWARD | 3 |
| 2010 | Standards for System Level DesignabstractStandards are emerging in the System Level Design area. After an initial period where models were created by a reduced number of experts, the trend is now to integrate models coming from various sources. In order to reduce integration effort when creating virtual prototypes, standards have been defined to increase model to model, and model to tool interoperability. After presenting the rationale for defining standards, and introducing the languages used in the field, we give a status of the currently available standards for System on Chip modeling and virtual prototype integration. We also identify the next steps, and indicate the next topics to be standardized, from a user perspective. Laurent Maillet-Contoz |
ICCAD | 1 |
| 2009 | Full simulation coverage for SystemC transaction-level models of systems-on-a-chip
Claude Helmstetter, Florence Maraninchi, Laurent Maillet-Contoz |
Formal Methods Syst. Des. | 3 |
| 2008 | A Method for the Efficient Development of Timed and Untimed Transaction-Level Models of Systems-on-ChipabstractTransaction level modeling (TLM) captures abstract models of systems-on-chip that simulate faster than traditional RTL simulations and are available earlier in the design flow. Such models allow the development of the embedded software on a virtual prototype of the hardware, before the chip is available. Various levels of details in TL models are needed; using untimed and timed models for different purposes is a usual practice. We present a method for developing very abstract untimed models first, and then enriching them to get detailed timed models, while preserving the functionality. The timed models can be as rich as the models usually written from scratch. The experiments with industrial case-studies show improved simulation speed and reduced modeling effort for both untimed and timed models. Jérôme Cornet, Florence Maraninchi, Laurent Maillet-Contoz |
DATE | 3 |
| 2007 | TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To AdoptionabstractTransaction-level modeling --- originally used decades ago in the development of telecommunications network architecture --- is now widely used in SoC design. Why? Because the modern SoC is now so complex that systematic modeling and analysis are required to devise the optimal chip architecture. The architectural model is the essential platform that kick-starts two other key tasks --- verification testbench development and software development. In addition, the interoperability imperatives of SoC design and verification, IP reuse, software development, and system evaluation and integration have driven the replacement of proprietary transaction-level modeling methodologies by a TLM standard that leverages the power of SystemC. The standard --- devised by the Open SystemC Initiative (OSCI) in collaboration with the Open Core Protocol International Partnership (OCP-IP) --- covers the multiple levels of abstraction required for all of the foregoing tasks. Francine Bacchini, Daniel Gajski, Laurent Maillet-Contoz, Haruhisa Kashiwagi, Jack Donovan, Tommi Mäkeläinen, Jack Greenbaum, Rishiyur S. Nikhil |
DAC | 3 |
| 2006 | Automatic Generation of Schedulings for Improving the Test Coverage of Systems-on-a-ChipabstractSystemC is becoming a de-facto standard for the early simulation of systems-on-a-chip (SoCs). It is a parallel language with a scheduler. Testing a SoC written in SystemC implies that we execute it, for some well chosen data. We are bound to use a particular deterministic implementation of the scheduler, whose specification is non-deterministic. Consequently, we may fail to discover bugs that would have appeared using another valid implementation of the scheduler. Current methods for testings SoCs concentrate on the generation of the inputs, and do not address this problem at all. We assume that the selection of relevant data is already done, and we generate several schedulings allowed by the scheduler specification. We use dynamic partial-order reduction techniques to avoid the generation of two schedulings that have the same effect on the system's behavior. Exploring alternative schedulings during testing is a way of guaranteeing that the SoC description, and in particular the embedded software, is scheduler-independent, hence more robust. The technique extends to the exploration of other non-fully specified aspects of SoC descriptions, like timing Claude Helmstetter, Florence Maraninchi, Laurent Maillet-Contoz, Matthieu Moy |
FMCAD | 3 |
| 2005 | Pinapa: an extraction tool for SystemC descriptions of systems-on-a-chipabstractSystemC is becoming a de-facto standard for the description of complex systems-on-a-chip. It enables system-level descriptions of SoCs: the same language is used for the description of the architecture, software and hardware parts.A tool like Pinapa is compulsory to work on realistic SoCs designs for anything else than simulation: it is able to extract both architecture and behavior information from SystemC code, with very few limitations. Pinapa can be used as a front-end for various analysis tools, ranging from "superlint" to model-checking. It is open source and available from http://greensocs.sourceforge.net/pinapa/. There exists no equivalent tool for SystemC up to now. Matthieu Moy, Florence Maraninchi, Laurent Maillet-Contoz |
EMSOFT | 3 |
| 1997 | High speed intelligent machine through programmable hardware: application to genomic systemsabstractThe paper proposes a new technology for intelligent machines based on the concept of programmable hardware. To build an intelligent system, the designer has to adapt it to the problem. First we show that programmable hardware is an intermediate step for building configurations, in order to choose the best architecture. In this case, the tasks are performed in a time period that respects human cognitive capacities. Next is detailed a multi level model composed of the cognitive, software and hardware levels. An experimental platform has been built, based on programmable hardware, and used in a "Grand Challenge" problem: knowledge discovery in genetic sequence databases, to compare the relative efficiencies of programmable hardware and classical Von Neumann based architecture. Programmable hardware is shown to have a significantly faster response time, which is essential for modern day intelligent machine user interaction. Eric Lemoine, Laurent Maillet-Contoz, David Merceron, Jean Sallantin |
KES (2) | 2 |