Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Hrolenok

dblp:08/8525 · also Brian Paul Hrolenok · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › offline imitation learning
behavior cloning
0.312017
Sampling Beats Fixed Estimate Predictors for Cloning Stochastic Behavior in Multiagent Systems · AAAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.312017
Sampling Beats Fixed Estimate Predictors for Cloning Stochastic Behavior in Multiagent Systems · AAAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
stochastic policy learning
0.112017
Sampling Beats Fixed Estimate Predictors for Cloning Stochastic Behavior in Multiagent Systems · AAAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling-based prediction · 0.3fixed estimate predictors · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Sampling Beats Fixed Estimate Predictors for Cloning Stochastic Behavior in Multiagent Systems
Brian Hrolenok, Byron Boots, Tucker R. Balch
AAAI1
2014 Inferring Social Structure of Animal Groups from Tracking Data
abstract
Inferring the social structures of animal groups from their observed behavior is a non-trivial task usually handled by direct observation. Recent advances in sensing and tracking technology have enabled the collection of dense spatial data over long periods of time automatically. The qualitative differences between sparse hand-coded data and dense tracking data necessitate a new approach to inferring the social structure of the observed animals. We present a framework for using agent-based simulations to guide our approach to inferring social structure from tracking data collected from a small group of rhesus macaques over a period of three months. As part of this framework, we describe a version of the DOMWORLD model of dominance interactions in rhesus macaques that has been modified to include association preference, and adapted to more closely match the environment where the monkeys were housed. An exploration of simulation results reveals important characteristics of the tracking data. The inferred social structures of the tracked monkeys are also presented.
Brian Hrolenok, Hanuma Teja Maddali, Michael Novitzky, Tucker R. Balch
ALIFE1