Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pawel Brach

dblp:09/10162 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 80% Computational complexity · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
0.212016
Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks · SODA 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.212016
Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks · SODA 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph theory
0.212016
Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks · SODA 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › complex networks › degree distribution
power-law degree distribution
0.212016
Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks · SODA 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › complex networks
scale-free networks
0.212016
Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks · SODA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

worst-case analysis · 0.2average-case analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Algorithmic Complexity of Power Law Networks
abstract
It was experimentally observed that the majority of real-world networks are scale-free and follow power law degree distribution. The aim of this paper is to study the algorithmic complexity of such “typical” networks. The contribution of this work is twofold. First, we define a deterministic condition for checking whether a graph has a power law degree distribution and experimentally validate it on real-world networks. This definition allows us to derive interesting properties of power law networks. We observe that for exponents of the degree distribution in the range [1, 2] such networks exhibit double power law phenomenon that was observed for several real-world networks. Our observation indicates that this phenomenon could be explained by just pure graph theoretical properties. The second aim of our work is to give a novel theoretical explanation why many algorithms run faster on real-world data than what is predicted by algorithmic worst-case analysis. We show how to exploit the power law degree distribution to design faster algorithms for a number of classic P-time problems including transitive closure, maximum matching, determinant, PageRank and matrix inverse. Moreover, we deal with the problems of counting triangles and finding maximum clique. In contrast to previously done average-case analyses, we believe that this is the first “waterproof” argument that explains why many real-world networks are easier. Moreover, an interesting aspect of this study is the existence of structure oblivious algorithms, i.e., algorithms that run faster on power law networks without explicit knowledge of this fact or explicit knowledge of the parameters of the degree distribution, e.g., algorithms for maximum clique or triangle counting.
Pawel Brach, Marek Cygan, Jakub Lacki, Piotr Sankowski
SODA1