Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oliver Serang
dblp:09/11132
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-1245-7051ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
convolution |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 A Bounded p-norm Approximation of Max-Convolution for Sub-Quadratic Bayesian Inference on Additive Factors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
marginal inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A Bounded p-norm Approximation of Max-Convolution for Sub-Quadratic Bayesian Inference on Additive Factors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trimmed p-convolution tree · 1.0max-convolution · 1.0cartesian product trees · 1.0viterbi algorithm · 0.5p-norm approximation · 0.5null space projection · 0.5chebyshev norm · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine EquationsabstractMultiple methods exist for computing marginals involving a linear Diophantine constraint on random variables. Each of these extant methods has some limitation on the dimension and support or on the type of marginal computed (e.g., sum-product inference, max-product inference, maximum a posteriori, etc.). Here, we introduce the "trimmed $p$-convolution tree'" an approach that generalizes the applicability of the existing methods and achieves a runtime within a $\log$-factor or better compared to the best existing methods. A second form of trimming we call underflow/overflow trimming is introduced which aggregates events which land outside the supports for a random variable into the nearest support. Trimmed $p$-convolution trees with and without underflow/overflow trimming are used in different protein inference models. Then two different methods of approximating max-convolution using Cartesian product trees are introduced. Patrick Kreitzberg, Oliver Serang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2016 | A Bounded p-norm Approximation of Max-Convolution for Sub-Quadratic Bayesian Inference on Additive FactorsabstractMax-convolution is an important problem closely resembling standard convolution; as such, max-convolution occurs frequently across many fields. Here we extend the method with fastest known worst-case runtime, which can be applied to nonnegative vectors by numerically approximating the Chebyshev norm $\| \cdot \|_\infty$, and use this approach to derive two numerically stable methods based on the idea of computing $p$-norms via fast convolution: The first method proposed, with runtime in $O( k \log(k) \log(\log(k)) )$ (which is less than $18 k \log(k)$ for any vectors that can be practically realized), uses the $p$-norm as a direct approximation of the Chebyshev norm. The second approach proposed, with runtime in $O( k \log(k) )$ (although in practice both perform similarly), uses a novel null space projection method, which extracts information from a sequence of $p$-norms to estimate the maximum value in the vector (this is equivalent to querying a small number of moments from a distribution of bounded support in order to estimate the maximum). The $p$-norm approaches are compared to one another and are shown to compute an approximation of the Viterbi path in a hidden Markov model where the transition matrix is a Toeplitz matrix; the runtime of approximating the Viterbi path is thus reduced from $O( n k^2 )$ steps to $O( n k \log(k))$ steps in practice, and is demonstrated by inferring the U.S. unemployment rate from the S&P 500 stock index. Julianus Pfeuffer, Oliver Serang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2013 | Concerning the accuracy of Fido and parameter choiceabstractAbstract Contact: [email protected] Oliver Serang |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2012 | Faster Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Inference: Junction Trees Are More Efficient than Sampling and Marginalization by EnumerationabstractThe problem of identifying the proteins in a complex mixture using tandem mass spectrometry can be framed as an inference problem on a graph that connects peptides to proteins. Several existing protein identification methods make use of statistical inference methods for graphical models, including expectation maximization, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and full marginalization coupled with approximation heuristics. We show that, for this problem, the majority of the cost of inference usually comes from a few highly connected subgraphs. Furthermore, we evaluate three different statistical inference methods using a common graphical model, and we demonstrate that junction tree inference substantially improves rates of convergence compared to existing methods. The python code used for this paper is available at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/fido. Oliver Serang, William Stafford Noble |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 1 |