Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nabil Schear
dblp:09/1658
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 57% Distributed systems · 43% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 59% Systems and software security · 23% Network security · 18% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud platform
bare-metal cloud |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Supporting Security Sensitive Tenants in a Bare-Metal Cloud · USENIX ATC 2019 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
forensic analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance Functions · WWW 2017 |
Systems and software security
isolation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Supporting Security Sensitive Tenants in a Bare-Metal Cloud · USENIX ATC 2019 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance Functions · WWW 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
protocol mediation · 0.6network provenance functions · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Supporting Security Sensitive Tenants in a Bare-Metal Cloud
Amin Mosayyebzadeh, Apoorve Mohan, Sahil Tikale, Mania Abdi, Nabil Schear, Trammell Hudson, Charles Munson, Larry Rudolph, Gene Cooperman, Peter Desnoyers, Orran Krieger |
USENIX ATC | 5 |
| 2017 | Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance FunctionsabstractDetecting and explaining the nature of attacks in distributed web services is often difficult -- determining the nature of suspicious activity requires following the trail of an attacker through a chain of heterogeneous software components including load balancers, proxies, worker nodes, and storage services. Unfortunately, existing forensic solutions cannot provide the necessary context to link events across complex workflows, particularly in instances where application layer semantics (e.g., SQL queries, RPCs) are needed to understand the attack. In this work, we present a transparent provenance-based approach for auditing web services through the introduction of Network Provenance Functions (NPFs). NPFs are a distributed architecture for capturing detailed data provenance for web service components, leveraging the key insight that mediation of an application's protocols can be used to infer its activities without requiring invasive instrumentation or developer cooperation. We design and implement NPF with consideration for the complexity of modern cloud-based web services, and evaluate our architecture against a variety of applications including DVDStore, RUBiS, and WikiBench to show that our system imposes as little as 9.3% average end-to-end overhead on connections for realistic workloads. Finally, we consider several scenarios in which our system can be used to concisely explain attacks. NPF thus enables the hassle-free deployment of semantically rich provenance-based auditing for complex applications workflows in the Cloud. Adam Bates 0001, Wajih Ul Hassan, Kevin R. B. Butler, Alin Dobra, Bradley Reaves, Patrick T. Cable II, Thomas Moyer, Nabil Schear |
WWW | 8 |
| 2016 | Bootstrapping and maintaining trust in the cloud
Nabil Schear, Patrick T. Cable II, Thomas Moyer, Bryan Richard, Robert Rudd |
ACSAC | 1 |
| 2015 | Spyglass: Demand-Provisioned Linux Containers for Private Network Access
Patrick T. Cable II, Nabil Schear |
LISA | 2 |
| 2012 | Website Detection Using Remote Traffic Analysis
Xun Gong 0001, Nikita Borisov, Negar Kiyavash, Nabil Schear |
Privacy Enhancing Technologies | 4 |
| 2010 | Neon: system support for derived data managementabstractModern organizations face increasingly complex information management requirements. A combination of commercial needs, legal liability and regulatory imperatives has created a patchwork of mandated policies. Among these, personally identifying customer records must be carefully access-controlled, sensitive files must be encrypted on mobile computers to guard against physical theft, and intellectual property must be protected from both exposure and "poisoning." However, enforcing such policies can be quite difficult in practice since users routinely share data over networks and derive new files from these inputs--incidentally laundering any policy restrictions. In this paper, we describe a virtual machine monitor system called Neon that transparently labels derived data using byte-level "tints" and tracks these labels end to end across commodity applications, operating systems and networks. Our goal with Neon is to explore the viability and utility of transparent information flow tracking within conventional networked systems when used in the manner in which they were intended. We demonstrate that this mechanism allows the enforcement of a variety of data management policies, including data-dependent confinement, mandatory I/O encryption, and intellectual property management. Qing Zhang 0012, John McCullough, Justin Ma, Nabil Schear, Michael Vrable, Amin Vahdat, Alex C. Snoeren, Geoffrey M. Voelker, Stefan Savage |
VEE | 4 |
| 2009 | MAVMM: Lightweight and Purpose Built VMM for Malware AnalysisabstractMalicious software is rampant on the Internet and costs billions of dollars each year. Safe and thorough analysis of malware is key to protecting vulnerable systems and cleaning those that have already been infected. Most current state-of-the-art analysis platforms run alongside the malware, increasing their detectability. This reduces the value of analysis because some malware is known to behave differently when being analyzed. Virtualization offers a compelling platform for malware analysis, with strong isolation and the ability to save and restore guest state. Current virtual machine monitors (VMMs), however, are not designed for malware analysis. Due to their complexity, they often fail to provide transparency and even expose vulnerabilities which could be exploited by the malware running inside guest system. We propose a lightweight VMM (namely MAVMM) that is designed specially for a single job: malware analysis. MAVMM does not implement unnecessary virtualization features commonly found in general purpose hypervisors, including virtual device emulation. We take advantage of hardware virtualization support to make MAVMM more simple, secure and transparent. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of MAVMM, and the features that we can extract from programs running inside the guest OS. We evaluate our platform in three aspects: functionality, detectability and performance. We show that our system can extract useful information from malicious software, and that it is not susceptible to known virtualization detection techniques. Anh M. Nguyen, Nabil Schear, HeeDong Jung, Apeksha Godiyal, Samuel T. King, Hai D. Nguyen |
ACSAC | 2 |
| 2008 | High-Speed Matching of Vulnerability Signatures
Nabil Schear, David R. Albrecht, Nikita Borisov |
RAID | 1 |
| 2006 | Glavlit: Preventing Exfiltration at Wire Speed
Nabil Schear, Carmelo Kintana, Qing Zhang 0012, Amin Vahdat |
HotNets | 1 |