Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Susan E. Conry

dblp:09/210 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 54% Distributed systems · 38% Performance modeling and evaluation · 8%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed coordination › multi-agent systems
distributed reasoning
0.011990
DARES: A Distributed Automated REasoning System · AAAI 1990
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel computation models
0.011979
On Functional Equivalences in a Model for Parallel Computation · Inf. Control. 1979
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Computer science accreditation (panel): current status and future directions
abstract
No abstract available.
Lawrence G. Jones, Keith Barker, Susan E. Conry, Doris K. Lidtke
SIGCSE3
1991 Multistage negotiation for distributed constraint satisfaction
abstract
A cooperation paradigm and coordination protocol for a distributed planning system consisting of a network of semi-autonomous agents with limited internode communication and no centralized control is presented. A multistage negotiation paradigm for solving distributed constraint satisfaction problems in this kind of system has been developed. The strategies presented enable an agent in a distributed planning system to become aware of the extent to which its own local decisions may have adverse nonlocal impact in planning. An example problem is presented in the context of transmission path restoration for dedicated circuits in a communications network. Multistage negotiation provides an agent with sufficient information about the impact of local decisions on a nonlocal state so that the agent may make local decisions that are correct from a global perspective, without attempting to provide a complete global state to all agents. Through multistage negotiation, an agent is able to recognize when a set of global goals cannot be satisfied, and is able to solve a related problem by finding a way of satisfying a reduced set of goals.>
Susan E. Conry, Kazuhiro Kuwabara, Victor R. Lesser, Robert A. Meyer
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.1
1991 Distributed automated reasoning: issues in coordination, cooperation, and performance
abstract
The authors present a distributed automated reasoning system (DARES) that can perform automated reasoning in, and about, a distributed domain. The technique developed for performing automated reasoning is discussed, with emphasis on issues dealing with task coordination and agent cooperation. Experimental results are presented to illustrate the performance of the system, and its ability to perform distributed automated reasoning. The experimental results demonstrate that agents in a loosely coupled network of problem solvers can work semi-independently, yet focus their attention with the aid of relatively simple heuristics when cooperation is appropriate.>
Douglas J. MacIntosh, Susan E. Conry, Robert A. Meyer
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.2
1990 DARES: A Distributed Automated REasoning System
Susan E. Conry, Douglas J. MacIntosh, Robert A. Meyer
AAAI1
1979 Models for specification and anaysis of parallel computing systems
abstract
The problem of designing a properly functioning parallel hardware or software system is considerably more difficult than that of designing a similar sequential system. In this paper we formulate criteria which a design methodology for parallel systems should satisfy and explore the use of various models as the basis for such a design tool.
Robert M. Mattheyses, Susan E. Conry
SIGMETRICS2
1979 On Functional Equivalences in a Model for Parallel Computation
Susan E. Conry, J. Robert Jump
Inf. Control.1