Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lau Ying Kit

dblp:09/4029 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling
dynamic scheduling
0.012000
Dynamic Task Scheduling Using Online Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.012000
Dynamic Task Scheduling Using Online Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
task scheduling
0.012000
Dynamic Task Scheduling Using Online Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing › multiprocessor system
distributed-memory multiprocessor
0.012000
Dynamic Task Scheduling Using Online Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online optimization · 0.0cost model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Dynamic Task Scheduling Using Online Optimization
abstract
Algorithms for scheduling independent tasks on to the processors of a multiprocessor system must trade-off processor load balance, memory locality, and scheduling overhead. Most existing algorithms, however, do not adequately balance these conflicting factors. This paper introduces the self-adjusting dynamic scheduling (SADS) class of algorithms that use a unified cost model to explicitly account for these factors at runtime. A dedicated processor performs scheduling in phases by maintaining a tree of partial schedules and incrementally assigning tasks to the least-cost schedule. A scheduling phase terminates whenever any processor becomes idle, at which time partial schedules are distributed to the processors. An extension of the basic SADS algorithm, called DBSADS, controls the scheduling overhead by giving higher priority to partial schedules with more task-to-processor assignments. These algorithms are compared to two distributed scheduling algorithms within a database application on an Intel Paragon distributed memory multiprocessor system.
Babak Hamidzadeh, Lau Ying Kit, David J. Lilja
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2