Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ben Westover

dblp:09/4325 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
background subtraction
0.012003
Evaluation of Local Models of Dynamic Backgrounds · CVPR (2) 2003
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video surveillance
0.012003
Evaluation of Local Models of Dynamic Backgrounds · CVPR (2) 2003
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.012003
Evaluation of Local Models of Dynamic Backgrounds · CVPR (2) 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optical flow · 0.1local spatio-temporal models · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Evaluation of Local Models of Dynamic Backgrounds
abstract
Background subtraction is the first step of many video surveillance applications. What is considered background varies by application, and may include regular, systematic, or complex motions. The paper explores the use of several different local spatio-temporal models of a background, defined at each pixel in the image. We present experiments with real image data and conclude that appropriate local representations are sufficient to make background models of complicated real world motions. Empirical studies illustrate, for example, that an optical flow-based model is able to detect emergency vehicles whose motion is different from those typically observed in traffic scenes. We conclude that "different models are appropriate for different scenes", but give criteria by which one can choose which model will be best.
Robert Pless, John Larson, Scott Siebers, Ben Westover
CVPR (2)4