The aggressive scaling of CMOS technology toward nanometer lengths contributed to the surfacing of many effects that were not appreciable at the micrometer regime. Among them, Inverted Temperature Dependence (ITD) is certainly the most unusual. It manifests itself as a speed up of CMOS gates when the temperature increases, resulting in a reversal of the worst-case condition, i.e., CMOS gates show the largest delay at low temperatures. On the other hand, for metal interconnects an high temperature still holds as worst case condition. The two contrasting behaviors may invalidate the results obtained through standard design flow which do not consider temperature as an explicit variable in their optimizations. In this paper we focus on the impact of ITD on clock distribution networks (CDN), whose function is vital to guarantee the synchronization among physically spaced sequential components of digital circuits. Using our simulation framework, we characterized the thermal behavior of a clock tree mapped onto an industrial 65nm CMOS technology and obtained using a standard synthesis tool. Results demonstrate the presence of ITD at low operating voltages and open new potential research scenarios into the EDA field.

Process variations - which affect critical electrical parameters and lead to both random and systematic changes in circuit performance - have always posed significant challenges to semiconductor design. In the past, within-die process variation was relatively small, and methods such as corner-based analysis were sufficient. This allowed timing analysis tools to calculate delays, slew times, coupling and power in a straightforward way. Today, the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors suggests that the semiconductor industry's historical ability to control process variations is under siege, for both devices and interconnects. As statistical variation increases, will corner-casing lead to too much conservatism, and hence a requirement for new statistical timing and noise analysis tools? In other words, is the design flow inevitably moving to "delay is no longer a number; it's a distribution"? Or are the urgency and the advantages of statistical timing analysis overstated.

No abstract available.