Standard image caption generation systems produce generic descriptions of images and do not utilize any contextual information or world knowledge. In particular, they are unable to generate captions that contain references to the geographic context of an image, for example, the location where a photograph is taken or relevant geographic objects around an image location. In this paper, we develop a geo-aware image caption generation system, which incorporates geographic contextual information into a standard image captioning pipeline. We propose a way to build an image-specific representation of the geographic context and adapt the caption generation network to produce appropriate geographic names in the image descriptions. We evaluate our system on a novel captioning dataset that contains contextualized captions and geographic metadata and achieve substantial improvements in BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR and CIDEr scores. We also introduce a new metric to assess generated geographic references directly and empirically demonstrate our system's ability to produce captions with relevant and factually accurate geographic referencing.

Assaf Toledo, Stavroula Alexandropoulou, Sophie Chesney, Robert Grimm, Pepijn Kokke, Benno Kruit, Kyriaki Neophytou, Antony Nguyen, Yoad Winter. Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2014.

Abstract Words in Semitic texts often consist of a concatenation of word segments , each corresponding to a part-of-speech (POS) category. Semitic words may be ambiguous with regard to their segmentation as well as to the POS tags assigned to each segment. When designing POS taggers for Semitic languages, a major architectural decision concerns the choice of the atomic input tokens (terminal symbols). If the tokenization is at the word level, the output tags must be complex, and represent both the segmentation of the word and the POS tag assigned to each word segment. If the tokenization is at the segment level, the input itself must encode the different alternative segmentations of the words, while the output consists of standard POS tags. Comparing these two alternatives is not trivial, as the choice between them may have global effects on the grammatical model. Moreover, intermediate levels of tokenization between these two extremes are conceivable, and, as we aim to show, beneficial. To the best of our knowledge, the problem of tokenization for POS tagging of Semitic languages has not been addressed before in full generality. In this paper, we study this problem for the purpose of POS tagging of Modern Hebrew texts. After extensive error analysis of the two simple tokenization models, we propose a novel, linguistically motivated, intermediate tokenization model that gives better performance for Hebrew over the two initial architectures. Our study is based on the well-known hidden Markov models (HMMs). We start out from a manually devised morphological analyzer and a very small annotated corpus, and describe how to adapt an HMM-based POS tagger for both tokenization architectures. We present an effective technique for smoothing the lexical probabilities using an untagged corpus, and a novel transformation for casting the segment-level tagger in terms of a standard, word-level HMM implementation. The results obtained using our model are on par with the best published results on Modern Standard Arabic, despite the much smaller annotated corpus available for Modern Hebrew.

We describe a text categorization approach that is based on a combination of feature distributional clusters with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Our feature selection approach employs distributional clustering of words via the recently introducedinformation bottleneck method, which generates a more efficientword-clusterrepresentation of documents. Combined with the classification power of an SVM, this method yields high performance text categorization that can outperform other recent methods in terms of categorization accuracy and representation efficiency. Comparing the accuracy of our method with other techniques, we observe significant dependency of the results on the data set. We discuss the potential reasons for this dependency.