Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryan Connaughton

dblp:09/6291 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › iris recognition
cross-sensor matching
0.112012
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012
Biometric security
iris recognition
0.112012
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012
Biometric security › iris recognition
iris matching
0.012012
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multialgorithm comparison · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors
abstract
The issue of interoperability between iris sensors is an important topic in large-scale and long-term applications of iris biometric systems. This work compares three commercially available iris sensors and three iris matching systems and investigates the impact of cross-sensor matching on system performance in comparison to single-sensor performance. Several factors which may impact single-sensor and cross-sensor performance are analyzed, including changes in the acquisition environment and differences in dilation ratio between iris images. The sensors are evaluated using three different iris matching algorithms, and conclusions are drawn regarding the interaction between the sensors and the matching algorithm in both the cross-sensor and single-sensor scenarios. Finally, the relative performances of the three sensors are compared.
Ryan Connaughton, Amanda Sgroi, Kevin W. Bowyer, Patrick J. Flynn
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1