Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew D. Zeiler
dblp:09/8653
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.4 | 3 | 2014 | Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks · ECCV (1) 2014 Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011 Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks · ECCV (1) 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
weight pruning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
deconvolutional network |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation › hierarchical representation learning
hierarchical feature learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › boltzmann machine
restricted boltzmann machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › energy-based model
temporal restricted boltzmann machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
facial animation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › facial animation
facial expression transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 2 | 2013 | Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013 Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation
image representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deconvolution · 0.2model aggregation · 0.2generalization bounds · 0.2max pooling · 0.1convolutional sparse coding · 0.1sparse coding · 0.1convolutional decomposition · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
Matthew D. Zeiler, Rob Fergus |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2013 | On rectified linear units for speech processingabstractDeep neural networks have recently become the gold standard for acoustic modeling in speech recognition systems. The key computational unit of a deep network is a linear projection followed by a point-wise non-linearity, which is typically a logistic function. In this work, we show that we can improve generalization and make training of deep networks faster and simpler by substituting the logistic units with rectified linear units. These units are linear when their input is positive and zero otherwise. In a supervised setting, we can successfully train very deep nets from random initialization on a large vocabulary speech recognition task achieving lower word error rates than using a logistic network with the same topology. Similarly in an unsupervised setting, we show how we can learn sparse features that can be useful for discriminative tasks. All our experiments are executed in a distributed environment using several hundred machines and several hundred hours of speech data. Matthew D. Zeiler, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Rajat Monga, Mark Z. Mao, Quoc V. Le, Patrick Nguyen, Andrew W. Senior, Vincent Vanhoucke, Jeffrey Dean, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2013 | Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnectabstractWe introduce DropConnect, a generalization of DropOut, for regularizing large fully-connected layers within neural networks. When training with Dropout, a randomly selected subset of activations are set to zero within each layer. DropConnect instead sets a randomly selected subset of weights within the network to zero. Each unit thus receives input from a random subset of units in the previous layer. We derive a bound on the generalization performance of both Dropout and DropConnect. We then evaluate DropConnect on a range of datasets, comparing to Dropout, and show state-of-the-art results on several image recoginition benchmarks can be obtained by aggregating multiple DropConnect-trained models. Li Wan 0002, Matthew D. Zeiler, Sixin Zhang, Yann LeCun, Rob Fergus |
ICML (3) | 2 |
| 2011 | Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learningabstractWe present a hierarchical model that learns image decompositions via alternating layers of convolutional sparse coding and max pooling. When trained on natural images, the layers of our model capture image information in a variety of forms: low-level edges, mid-level edge junctions, high-level object parts and complete objects. To build our model we rely on a novel inference scheme that ensures each layer reconstructs the input, rather than just the output of the layer directly beneath, as is common with existing hierarchical approaches. This makes it possible to learn multiple layers of representation and we show models with 4 layers, trained on images from the Caltech-101 and 256 datasets. When combined with a standard classifier, features extracted from these models outperform SIFT, as well as representations from other feature learning methods. Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Rob Fergus |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2011 | Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann MachinesabstractWe present a type of Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machine that defines a probability distribution over an output sequence conditional on an input sequence. It shares the desirable properties of RBMs: efficient exact inference, an exponentially more expressive latent state than HMMs, and the ability to model nonlinear structure and dynamics. We apply our model to a challenging real-world graphics problem: facial expression transfer. Our results demonstrate improved performance over several baselines modeling high-dimensional 2D and 3D data. Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Leonid Sigal, Iain A. Matthews, Rob Fergus |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2010 | Deconvolutional networksabstractBuilding robust low and mid-level image representations, beyond edge primitives, is a long-standing goal in vision. Many existing feature detectors spatially pool edge information which destroys cues such as edge intersections, parallelism and symmetry. We present a learning framework where features that capture these mid-level cues spontaneously emerge from image data. Our approach is based on the convolutional decomposition of images under a spar-sity constraint and is totally unsupervised. By building a hierarchy of such decompositions we can learn rich feature sets that are a robust image representation for both the analysis and synthesis of images. Matthew D. Zeiler, Dilip Krishnan, Graham W. Taylor, Rob Fergus |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2009 | Modeling pigeon behavior using a Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machine
Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Nikolaus F. Troje, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ESANN | 1 |