Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew D. Zeiler

dblp:09/8653 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% Trustworthy machine learning · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.432014
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks · ECCV (1) 2014
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011
Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212014
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks · ECCV (1) 2014
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.212013
Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.212013
Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
weight pruning
0.212013
Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
deconvolutional network
0.112011
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation › hierarchical representation learning
hierarchical feature learning
0.112011
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › boltzmann machine
restricted boltzmann machine
0.112011
Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Generative modeling › energy-based model
temporal restricted boltzmann machine
0.112011
Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011
Computer animation and physical simulation
facial animation
0.112011
Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011
Computer animation and physical simulation › facial animation
facial expression transfer
0.112011
Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning
0.112010
Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.122013
Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect · ICML (3) 2013
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation
image representation
0.012010
Deconvolutional networks · CVPR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deconvolution · 0.2model aggregation · 0.2generalization bounds · 0.2max pooling · 0.1convolutional sparse coding · 0.1sparse coding · 0.1convolutional decomposition · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
Matthew D. Zeiler, Rob Fergus
ECCV (1)1
2013 On rectified linear units for speech processing
abstract
Deep neural networks have recently become the gold standard for acoustic modeling in speech recognition systems. The key computational unit of a deep network is a linear projection followed by a point-wise non-linearity, which is typically a logistic function. In this work, we show that we can improve generalization and make training of deep networks faster and simpler by substituting the logistic units with rectified linear units. These units are linear when their input is positive and zero otherwise. In a supervised setting, we can successfully train very deep nets from random initialization on a large vocabulary speech recognition task achieving lower word error rates than using a logistic network with the same topology. Similarly in an unsupervised setting, we show how we can learn sparse features that can be useful for discriminative tasks. All our experiments are executed in a distributed environment using several hundred machines and several hundred hours of speech data.
Matthew D. Zeiler, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Rajat Monga, Mark Z. Mao, Quoc V. Le, Patrick Nguyen, Andrew W. Senior, Vincent Vanhoucke, Jeffrey Dean, Geoffrey E. Hinton
ICASSP1
2013 Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect
abstract
We introduce DropConnect, a generalization of DropOut, for regularizing large fully-connected layers within neural networks. When training with Dropout, a randomly selected subset of activations are set to zero within each layer. DropConnect instead sets a randomly selected subset of weights within the network to zero. Each unit thus receives input from a random subset of units in the previous layer. We derive a bound on the generalization performance of both Dropout and DropConnect. We then evaluate DropConnect on a range of datasets, comparing to Dropout, and show state-of-the-art results on several image recoginition benchmarks can be obtained by aggregating multiple DropConnect-trained models.
Li Wan 0002, Matthew D. Zeiler, Sixin Zhang, Yann LeCun, Rob Fergus
ICML (3)2
2011 Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning
abstract
We present a hierarchical model that learns image decompositions via alternating layers of convolutional sparse coding and max pooling. When trained on natural images, the layers of our model capture image information in a variety of forms: low-level edges, mid-level edge junctions, high-level object parts and complete objects. To build our model we rely on a novel inference scheme that ensures each layer reconstructs the input, rather than just the output of the layer directly beneath, as is common with existing hierarchical approaches. This makes it possible to learn multiple layers of representation and we show models with 4 layers, trained on images from the Caltech-101 and 256 datasets. When combined with a standard classifier, features extracted from these models outperform SIFT, as well as representations from other feature learning methods.
Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Rob Fergus
ICCV1
2011 Facial Expression Transfer with Input-Output Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines
abstract
We present a type of Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machine that defines a probability distribution over an output sequence conditional on an input sequence. It shares the desirable properties of RBMs: efficient exact inference, an exponentially more expressive latent state than HMMs, and the ability to model nonlinear structure and dynamics. We apply our model to a challenging real-world graphics problem: facial expression transfer. Our results demonstrate improved performance over several baselines modeling high-dimensional 2D and 3D data.
Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Leonid Sigal, Iain A. Matthews, Rob Fergus
NIPS1
2010 Deconvolutional networks
abstract
Building robust low and mid-level image representations, beyond edge primitives, is a long-standing goal in vision. Many existing feature detectors spatially pool edge information which destroys cues such as edge intersections, parallelism and symmetry. We present a learning framework where features that capture these mid-level cues spontaneously emerge from image data. Our approach is based on the convolutional decomposition of images under a spar-sity constraint and is totally unsupervised. By building a hierarchy of such decompositions we can learn rich feature sets that are a robust image representation for both the analysis and synthesis of images.
Matthew D. Zeiler, Dilip Krishnan, Graham W. Taylor, Rob Fergus
CVPR1
2009 Modeling pigeon behavior using a Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machine
Matthew D. Zeiler, Graham W. Taylor, Nikolaus F. Troje, Geoffrey E. Hinton
ESANN1