Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jim Lim

dblp:09/9795 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 70% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › score matching
denoising score matching
0.912025
Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
distribution matching
0.912025
Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model
0.912025
Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
likelihood-based generative model
0.312025
Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score matching · 0.9geometry-preserving regularization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularization
abstract
Distribution matching (DM) is a versatile domain-invariant representation learning technique that has been applied to tasks such as fair classification, domain adaptation, and domain translation. Non-parametric DM methods struggle with scalability and adversarial DM approaches suffer from instability and mode collapse. While likelihood-based methods are a promising alternative, they often impose unnecessary biases through fixed priors or require explicit density models (e.g., flows) that can be challenging to train. We address this limitation by introducing a novel approach to training likelihood-based DM using expressive score-based prior distributions. Our key insight is that gradient-based DM training only requires the prior’s score function—not its density—allowing us to train the prior via denoising score matching. This approach eliminates biases from fixed priors (e.g., in VAEs), enabling more effective use of geometry-preserving regularization, while avoiding the challenge of learning an explicit prior density model (e.g., a flow-based prior). Our method also demonstrates better stability and computational efficiency compared to other diffusion-based priors (e.g., LSGM). Furthermore, experiments demonstrate superior performance across multiple tasks, establishing our score-based method as a stable and effective approach to distribution matching. Source code available at https://github.com/inouye-lab/SAUB.
Jim Lim, David I. Inouye
ICML2