Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wenquan Wu

dblp:10/10021 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7565-9569ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Language models and text generation · 23% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety › safety alignment
overrefusal
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › interpretable deep learning
residual stream analysis
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model safety
safety fine-tuning
0.912025
Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › textual entailment
contradiction detection
0.612022
CDConv: A Benchmark for Contradiction Detection in Chinese Conversations · EMNLP 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
0.412019
Proactive Human-Machine Conversation with Explicit Conversation Goal · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
proactive dialogue
0.412019
Proactive Human-Machine Conversation with Explicit Conversation Goal · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularizer · 0.9PCA · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.6sequence-to-sequence modeling · 0.4knowledge graph planning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Residual Stream Analysis of Overfitting And Structural Disruptions
abstract
Ensuring that large language models (LLMs) remain both helpful and harmless poses a significant challenge: fine-tuning on repetitive safety datasets—where unsafe prompts are paired with standard refusal templates—often leads to \emph{false refusals}, in which benign queries are declined. We first quantify this effect, showing that safety data exhibits substantially lower token entropy ($H_{1}\approx9.18$) and 2-gram diversity ($\approx$ 0.048) compared to general instruction data ($H_{1}\approx12.05$, 2-gram$\approx$0.205). To uncover the root cause, we introduce \emph{FlowLens}, a stable PCA-based tool for residual-stream geometry analysis, and reveal that higher proportions of safety examples concentrate variance along a few components, reducing representational smoothness and driving false refusals (false refusal rate rises from 63\% to 84\% as safety data increases from 0\% to 40\%). Guided by these insights, we propose \emph{Variance Concentration Loss} (VCL), an auxiliary regularizer that penalizes excessive variance concentration in mid-layer residuals. Empirical results demonstrate that VCL reduces false refusals by over 35 percentage points while maintaining or improving performance on general benchmarks such as MMLU and GSM8K.
Wenquan Wu, Hua Wu 0003, Sen Su
NeurIPS3
2022 CDConv: A Benchmark for Contradiction Detection in Chinese Conversations
abstract
Chujie Zheng, Jinfeng Zhou, Yinhe Zheng, Libiao Peng, Zhen Guo, Wenquan Wu, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Chujie Zheng, Jinfeng Zhou, Yinhe Zheng, Libiao Peng, Wenquan Wu, Zhengyu Niu, Hua Wu 0003, Minlie Huang
EMNLP6
2019 Proactive Human-Machine Conversation with Explicit Conversation Goal
abstract
Though great progress has been made for human-machine conversation, current dialogue system is still in its infancy: it usually converses passively and utters words more as a matter of response, rather than on its own initiatives. In this paper, we take a radical step towards building a human-like conversational agent: endowing it with the ability of proactively leading the conversation (introducing a new topic or maintaining the current topic). To facilitate the development of such conversation systems, we create a new dataset named Konv where one acts as a conversation leader and the other acts as the follower. The leader is provided with a knowledge graph and asked to sequentially change the discussion topics, following the given conversation goal, and meanwhile keep the dialogue as natural and engaging as possible. Konv enables a very challenging task as the model needs to both understand dialogue and plan over the given knowledge graph. We establish baseline results on this dataset (about 270K utterances and 30k dialogues) using several state-of-the-art models. Experimental results show that dialogue models that plan over the knowledge graph can make full use of related knowledge to generate more diverse multi-turn conversations. The baseline systems along with the dataset are publicly available.
Wenquan Wu, Xiangyang Zhou, Hua Wu 0003, Xiyuan Zhang 0002, Rongzhong Lian, Haifeng Wang 0001
ACL (1)1
2019 An Overview of the 2019 Language and Intelligence Challenge
Quan Wang 0002, Wenquan Wu, Yabing Shi, Wei He 0014, Ying Chen 0011, Yajuan Lyu, Hua Wu 0003
NLPCC (2)2