Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaeseok Jang
dblp:10/11024
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 76% Learning theory · 24% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | TAIL-MIL: Time-Aware and Instance-Learnable Multiple Instance Learning for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection · AAAI 2025 Are Multiple Instance Learning Algorithms Learnable for Instances? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TAIL-MIL: Time-Aware and Instance-Learnable Multiple Instance Learning for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection · AAAI 2025 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › time series anomaly detection
multivariate time series anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TAIL-MIL: Time-Aware and Instance-Learnable Multiple Instance Learning for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multiple instance learning
deep multiple instance learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Are Multiple Instance Learning Algorithms Learnable for Instances? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Are Multiple Instance Learning Algorithms Learnable for Instances? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conjunctive pooling · 1.7attention mechanism · 1.7PAC learning theory · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TAIL-MIL: Time-Aware and Instance-Learnable Multiple Instance Learning for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly DetectionabstractThis study addresses the challenge of detecting anomalies in multivariate time series data. Considering a bag (e.g., multi-sensor data) consisting of two-dimensional spaces of time points and multivariate instances (e.g., individual sensors), we aim to detect anomalies at both the bag and instance level with a unified model. To circumvent the practical difficulties of labeling at the instance level in such spaces, we adopt a multiple instance learning (MIL)-based approach, which enables learning at both the bag- and instance- levels using only the bag-level labels. In this study, we introduce time-aware and instance-learnable MIL (simply, TAIL-MIL). We propose two specialized attention mechanisms designed to effectively capture the relationships between different types of instances. We innovatively integrate these attention mechanisms with conjunctive pooling applied to the two-dimensional structure at different levels (i.e., bag- and instance-level), enabling TAIL-MIL to effectively pinpoint both the timing and causative multivariate factors of anomalies. We provide theoretical evidence demonstrating TAIL-MIL's efficacy in detecting instances with two-dimensional structures. Furthermore, we empirically validate the superior performance of TAIL-MIL over the state-of-the-art MIL methods and multivariate time-series anomaly detection methods. Jaeseok Jang, Hyukyoon Kwon |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Contour-based object forecasting for autonomous driving
Jaeseok Jang, Dahyun Kim 0003, Dongkwon Jin, Chang-Su Kim 0001 |
J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. | 1 |
| 2024 | Are Multiple Instance Learning Algorithms Learnable for Instances?abstractMultiple Instance Learning (MIL) has been increasingly adopted to mitigate the high costs and complexity associated with labeling individual instances, learning instead from bags of instances labeled at the bag level and enabling instance-level labeling. While existing research has primarily focused on the learnability of MIL at the bag level, there is an absence of theoretical exploration to check if a given MIL algorithm is learnable at the instance level. This paper proposes a theoretical framework based on probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory to assess the instance-level learnability of deep multiple instance learning (Deep MIL) algorithms. Our analysis exposes significant gaps between current Deep MIL algorithms, highlighting the theoretical conditions that must be satisfied by MIL algorithms to ensure instance-level learnability. With these conditions, we interpret the learnability of the representative Deep MIL algorithms and validate them through empirical studies. Jaeseok Jang, Hyukyoon Kwon |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Enhancing performance of transformer-based models in natural language understanding through word importance embedding
Seung-Kyu Hong, Jaeseok Jang, Hyukyoon Kwon |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |