Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omid Javidbakht

dblp:10/11068 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 48% Network security · 28% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 24%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy analysis › privacy models
central differential privacy
0.812024
Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data Analysis · CCS 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.812024
Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data Analysis · CCS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
adaptive gradient methods
0.512021
Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic convex optimization
differentially private optimization
0.512021
Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization
0.512021
Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization · ICML 2021
Network security
anonymity networks
0.312017
Delay Anonymity Tradeoff in Mix Networks: Optimal Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017
Network security › anonymity networks
latency-anonymity tradeoff
0.312017
Delay Anonymity Tradeoff in Mix Networks: Optimal Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017
Network security › anonymity networks
mix networks
0.312017
Delay Anonymity Tradeoff in Mix Networks: Optimal Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
routing optimization
0.112017
Delay Anonymity Tradeoff in Mix Networks: Optimal Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 1.0non-isotropic clipping · 1.0adaptive stepsizes · 1.0secure aggregation · 0.8cryptographic primitives · 0.8timing analysis · 0.6multipath routing optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data Analysis
abstract
We revisit the problem of designing scalable protocols for private statistics and private federated learning when each device holds its private data. Locally differentially private algorithms require little trust but are (provably) limited in their utility. Centrally differentially private algorithms can allow significantly better utility but require a trusted curator. This gap has led to significant interest in the design and implementation of simple cryptographic primitives, that can allow central-like utility guarantees without having to trust a central server.
Kunal Talwar, Shan Wang 0020, Audra McMillan, Vitaly Feldman, Pansy Bansal, Bailey Basile, Áine Cahill, Yi Sheng Chan, Mike Chatzidakis, Junye Chen, Oliver R. A. Chick, Mona Chitnis, Suman Ganta, Yusuf Goren, Filip Granqvist, Kristine Guo, Frederic Jacobs, Omid Javidbakht, Albert Liu, Richard Low, Dan Mascenik, Steve Myers, David Park, Wonhee Park, Gianni Parsa, Tommy Pauly, Christian Priebe, Rehan Rishi, Guy N. Rothblum, Congzheng Song, Linmao Song, Karl Tarbe, Sebastian Vogt 0003, Shundong Zhou, Vojta Jina, Michael Scaria, Luke Winstrom
CCS18
2021 Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization
abstract
We study adaptive methods for differentially private convex optimization, proposing and analyzing differentially private variants of a Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) algorithm with adaptive stepsizes, as well as the AdaGrad algorithm. We provide upper bounds on the regret of both algorithms and show that the bounds are (worst-case) optimal. As a consequence of our development, we show that our private versions of AdaGrad outperform adaptive SGD, which in turn outperforms traditional SGD in scenarios with non-isotropic gradients where (non-private) Adagrad provably outperforms SGD. The major challenge is that the isotropic noise typically added for privacy dominates the signal in gradient geometry for high-dimensional problems; approaches to this that effectively optimize over lower-dimensional subspaces simply ignore the actual problems that varying gradient geometries introduce. In contrast, we study non-isotropic clipping and noise addition, developing a principled theoretical approach; the consequent procedures also enjoy significantly stronger empirical performance than prior approaches.
Hilal Asi, John C. Duchi, Alireza Fallah 0001, Omid Javidbakht, Kunal Talwar
ICML4
2017 Delay Anonymity Tradeoff in Mix Networks: Optimal Routing
abstract
Anonymous systems on the Internet aim to protect users from revealing to an external unauthorized entity their identities and their network activities. Despite using layered encryption, these systems are still vulnerable to timing analysis, wherein an eavesdropper can use traffic correlation mechanisms to identify the source of packets arriving at a destination. Mixes are intelligent routers or proxy servers that aim to provide packet source anonymity from timing analysis by delaying and shuffling the order of received packets prior to transmission. Such shuffling strategies naturally increase latency and result in a tradeoff between anonymity and latency. This paper investigates this tradeoff in a network of mixes, by deriving the optimal routing for sources which maximizes weighted sum of anonymity and delay. The achievable anonymity is characterized analytically for a general multipath model, and it is shown that under light traffic conditions, there exists a unique single route strategy, which achieves the optimal delay anonymity tradeoff. A low complexity algorithm is presented that derives the optimal routes to achieve a desired tradeoff. The light traffic results are specialized for a graphical model of existing practical anonymous systems, and optimal scaling behavior with the size of such networks is characterized. In the heavy traffic regime, it is shown that optimal anonymity is achieved for any allocation of rates across the different routes. Simulations on example networks are presented where it is shown that the optimal routes derived under light traffic performs quite well in general traffic regime.
Omid Javidbakht, Parv Venkitasubramaniam
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1