Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Grzegorz Soza

dblp:10/2896 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 62% Geometric modeling and processing · 38%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
medical visualization
0.212014
ADR - Anatomy-Driven Reformation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › template matching
deformable template matching
0.112012
A learning based deformable template matching method for automatic rib centerline extraction and labeling in CT images · CVPR 2012
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.112012
A learning based deformable template matching method for automatic rib centerline extraction and labeling in CT images · CVPR 2012
Geometric modeling and processing › deformation
as-rigid-as-possible deformation
0.112014
ADR - Anatomy-Driven Reformation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014
Geometric modeling and processing › shape deformation
volume deformation
0.112014
ADR - Anatomy-Driven Reformation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov random field · 0.3learning-based detection · 0.3active contour model · 0.3non-linear deformation · 0.2importance map · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Estimating a Patient Surface Model for Optimizing the Medical Scanning Workflow
Yao-Jen Chang, Michael Wels, Grzegorz Soza, Terrence Chen
MICCAI (1)5
2014 ADR - Anatomy-Driven Reformation
abstract
Dedicated visualization methods are among the most important tools of modern computer-aided medical applications. Reformation methods such as Multiplanar Reformation or Curved Planar Reformation have evolved as useful tools that facilitate diagnostic and therapeutic work. In this paper, we present a novel approach that can be seen as a generalization of Multiplanar Reformation to curved surfaces. The main concept is to generate reformatted medical volumes driven by the individual anatomical geometry of a specific patient. This process generates flat views of anatomical structures that facilitate many tasks such as diagnosis, navigation and annotation. Our reformation framework is based on a non-linear as-rigid-as-possible volumetric deformation scheme that uses generic triangular surface meshes as input. To manage inevitable distortions during reformation, we introduce importance maps which allow controlling the error distribution and improving the overall visual quality in areas of elevated interest. Our method seamlessly integrates with well-established concepts such as the slice-based inspection of medical datasets and we believe it can improve the overall efficiency of many medical workflows. To demonstrate this, we additionally present an integrated visualization system and discuss several use cases that substantiate its benefits.
Jan Kretschmer, Grzegorz Soza, Christian Tietjen, Michael Sühling, Bernhard Preim, Marc Stamminger
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2
2012 A learning based deformable template matching method for automatic rib centerline extraction and labeling in CT images
abstract
The automatic extraction and labeling of the rib centerlines is a useful yet challenging task in many clinical applications. In this paper, we propose a new approach integrating rib seed point detection and template matching to detect and identify each rib in chest CT scans. The bottom-up learning based detection exploits local image cues and top-down deformable template matching imposes global shape constraints. To adapt to the shape deformation of different rib cages whereas maintain high computational efficiency, we employ a Markov Random Field (MRF) based articulated rigid transformation method followed by Active Contour Model (ACM) deformation. Compared with traditional methods that each rib is individually detected, traced and labeled, the new approach is not only much more robust due to prior shape constraints of the whole rib cage, but removes tedious post-processing such as rib pairing and ordering steps because each rib is automatically labeled during the template matching. For experimental validation, we create an annotated database of 112 challenging volumes with ribs of various sizes, shapes, and pathologies such as metastases and fractures. The proposed approach shows orders of magnitude higher detection and labeling accuracy than state-of-the-art solutions and runs about 40 seconds for a complete rib cage on the average.
Dijia Wu, David Liu 0001, Zoltan Puskas, Chao Lu 0011, Andreas Wimmer, Christian Tietjen, Grzegorz Soza, Shaohua Kevin Zhou
CVPR7
2011 Automatic Contrast Phase Estimation in CT Volumes
Michal Sofka, Dijia Wu, Michael Sühling, David Liu 0001, Christian Tietjen, Grzegorz Soza, Shaohua Kevin Zhou
MICCAI (3)6
2009 A Generic Probabilistic Active Shape Model for Organ Segmentation
Andreas Wimmer, Grzegorz Soza, Joachim Hornegger
MICCAI (1)2
2009 Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets
abstract
This paper presents a comparison study between 10 automatic and six interactive methods for liver segmentation from contrast-enhanced CT images. It is based on results from the "MICCAI 2007 Grand Challenge" workshop, where 16 teams evaluated their algorithms on a common database. A collection of 20 clinical images with reference segmentations was provided to train and tune algorithms in advance. Participants were also allowed to use additional proprietary training data for that purpose. All teams then had to apply their methods to 10 test datasets and submit the obtained results. Employed algorithms include statistical shape models, atlas registration, level-sets, graph-cuts and rule-based systems. All results were compared to reference segmentations five error measures that highlight different aspects of segmentation accuracy. All measures were combined according to a specific scoring system relating the obtained values to human expert variability. In general, interactive methods reached higher average scores than automatic approaches and featured a better consistency of segmentation quality. However, the best automatic methods (mainly based on statistical shape models with some additional free deformation) could compete well on the majority of test images. The study provides an insight in performance of different segmentation approaches under real-world conditions and highlights achievements and limitations of current image analysis techniques.
Tobias Heimann, Bram van Ginneken, Martin Styner, Yulia Arzhaeva, Volker Aurich, Christian Bauer 0001, Andreas Beck 0001, Christoph Becker 0002, Reinhard Beichel, György Bekes, Fernando Bello, Gerd Karl Binnig, Horst Bischof, Alexander Bornik, Peter Cashman, Ying Chi, Andrés Cordova, Benoit M. Dawant, Márta Fidrich, Jacob D. Furst, Daisuke Furukawa, Lars Grenacher, Joachim Hornegger, Dagmar Kainmüller, Richard Kitney, Hidefumi Kobatake, Hans Lamecker, Thomas Lange, Brian Lennon, Rui Li 0012, Senhu Li, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Gábor Németh, Daniela Raicu, Anne-Mareike Rau, Eva M. van Rikxoort, Mikaël Rousson, László Ruskó, Kinda Anna Saddi, Günter Schmidt 0001, Dieter Seghers, Akinobu Shimizu, Pieter Slagmolen, Erich Sorantin, Grzegorz Soza, Ruchaneewan Susomboon, Jonathan M. Waite, Andreas Wimmer, Ivo Wolf
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging46
2008 Implicit active shape model employing boundary classifier
abstract
We present an algorithm for the segmentation of the liver in 2-D computed tomography slice images. The basis for our algorithm is an implicit active shape model. In order to detect the liver boundary and guide the shape model deformation, a boundary classifier has been integrated into the implicit framework in a novel manner. The accuracy of the algorithm has been evaluated for 20 test cases including both normal and abnormal livers.
Andreas Wimmer, Joachim Hornegger, Grzegorz Soza
ICPR3
2007 Correction of susceptibility artifacts in diffusion tensor data using non-linear registration
Dorit Merhof, Grzegorz Soza, Andreas Stadlbauer, Günther Greiner, Christopher Nimsky
Medical Image Anal.2
2004 Estimating Mechanical Brain Tissue Properties with Simulation and Registration
Grzegorz Soza, Roberto Grosso, Christopher Nimsky, Günther Greiner, Peter Hastreiter
MICCAI (2)1
2004 Strategies for brain shift evaluation
Peter Hastreiter, Christof Rezk-Salama, Grzegorz Soza, Michael Bauer 0002, Günther Greiner, Rudolf Fahlbusch, Oliver Ganslandt, Christopher Nimsky
Medical Image Anal.3
2002 Non-rigid Registration with Use of Hardware-Based 3D Bézier Functions
Grzegorz Soza, Michael Bauer 0002, Peter Hastreiter, Christopher Nimsky, Günther Greiner
MICCAI (2)1
2001 Remote Analysis for Brain Shift Compensation
Peter Hastreiter, Klaus Engel, Grzegorz Soza, Michael Bauer 0002, Matthias Wolf 0001, Oliver Ganslandt, Rudolf Fahlbusch, Günther Greiner, Thomas Ertl, Christopher Nimsky
MICCAI3