Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinsong Xia

dblp:10/313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 77% Data mining · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models
discriminative model
0.112005
Linear discriminant model for information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Information retrieval › retrieval models
language model
0.112005
Linear discriminant model for information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
latent dirichlet allocation
0.112005
Linear discriminant model for information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112005
Linear discriminant model for information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation
0.012004
Adaptive Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL 2004
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
feature-based ranking
0.012005
Linear discriminant model for information retrieval · SIGIR 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perceptron · 0.1linguistic features · 0.1average precision optimization · 0.1HMM features · 0.1transformation-based learning · 0.0sampling · 0.0linear model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Linear discriminant model for information retrieval
abstract
This paper presents a new discriminative model for information retrieval (IR), referred to as linear discriminant model (LDM), which provides a flexible framework to incorporate arbitrary features. LDM is different from most existing models in that it takes into account a variety of linguistic features that are derived from the component models of HMM that is widely used in language modeling approaches to IR. Therefore, LDM is a means of melding discriminative and generative models for IR. We present two algorithms of parameter learning for LDM. One is to optimize the average precision (AP) directly using an iterative procedure. The other is a perceptron-based algorithm that minimizes the number of discordant document-pairs in a rank list. The effectiveness of our approach has been evaluated on the task of ad hoc retrieval using six English and Chinese TREC test sets. Results show that (1) in most test sets, LDM significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art language modeling approaches and the classical probabilistic retrieval model; (2) it is more appropriate to train LDM using a measure of AP rather than likelihood if the IR system is graded on AP; and (3) linguistic features (e.g. phrases and dependences) are effective for IR if they are incorporated properly.
Jianfeng Gao 0001, Haoliang Qi, Xinsong Xia, Jian-Yun Nie
SIGIR3
2004 Adaptive Chinese Word Segmentation
abstract
This paper presents a Chinese word segmentation system which can adapt to different domains and standards. We first present a statistical framework where domain-specific words are identified in a unified approach to word segmentation based on linear models. We explore several features and describe how to create training data by sampling. We then describe a transformation-based learning method used to adapt our system to different word segmentation standards. Evaluation of the proposed system on five test sets with different standards shows that the system achieves state- of-the-art performance on all of them.
Jianfeng Gao 0001, Andi Wu, Cheng-Ning Huang, Hongqiao Li, Xinsong Xia, Hauwei Qin
ACL5