Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.

dblp:10/6166 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-5714-991XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
9 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 92% Computational science and engineering · 8%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology
biomedical ontology
0.212014
Ontodog: a web-based ontology community view generation tool · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment › alignment quality assessment
alignment benchmark
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › read mapping
spliced alignment
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Computational science and engineering › scientific data management
data standards
0.122006
The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2006
An object model and database for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.122005
A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › ontology
ontology development
0.112006
The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112014
Ontodog: a web-based ontology community view generation tool · Bioinform. 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology-based annotation
0.112014
Ontodog: a web-based ontology community view generation tool · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112005
A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
data integration
0.012004
RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics
0.012004
An object model and database for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
gene expression data management
0.012004
RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.012004
RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › RNA splicing analysis
splice junction detection
0.012011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
gene expression database
0.012001
A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
gene expression pattern discovery
0.012000
Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.012000
Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012005
A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Data models and query languages › relational model
relational schema
0.012001
A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments · Bioinform. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology subsetting · 0.4community view generation · 0.4simulation · 0.1sanger sequencing · 0.1RT-PCR · 0.1ontology engineering · 0.1permutation testing · 0.1SAM · 0.1PaGE · 0.1object modeling · 0.0ontology-based sample description · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Ontodog: a web-based ontology community view generation tool
abstract
Biomedical ontologies are often very large and complex. Only a subset of the ontology may be needed for a specified application or community. For ontology end users, it is desirable to have community-based labels rather than the labels generated by ontology developers. Ontodog is a web-based system that can generate an ontology subset based on Excel input, and support generation of an ontology community view, which is defined as the whole or a subset of the source ontology with user-specified annotations including user-preferred labels. Ontodog allows users to easily generate community views with minimal ontology knowledge and no programming skills or installation required. Currently >100 ontologies including all OBO Foundry ontologies are available to generate the views based on user needs. We demonstrate the application of Ontodog for the generation of community views using the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations as the source ontology.
Jie Zheng 0001, Zuoshuang Xiang, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Yongqun He
Bioinform.3
2012 Suggestions for Galaxy Workflow Design Using Semantically Annotated Services
abstract
The wide-scale development of ontologies in the bioinformatics domain facilitates their use in the creation of scientific workflows. To speed up the design of workflows, a Service Suggestion Engine is interfaced to the Galaxy Tool Integration and Workflow Platform. This enables users to ask for suggestions (e.g., what operation should go next) while designing workflows with the Galaxy user interface. The Service Suggest Engine utilizes semantic annotations to suggest appropriate Web service operations to plug into the workflow under design. The enriched Ontology for Biomedical Investigation (OBI) is used as a target for the annotations. The effectiveness of the suggestions provided is evaluated against a consensus of domain experts.
Alok Dhamanaskar, Michael E. Cotterell, Jie Zheng 0001, Jessica C. Kissinger, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., John A. Miller 0001
FOIS5
2011 Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM)
abstract
MOTIVATION: A critical task in high-throughput sequencing is aligning millions of short reads to a reference genome. Alignment is especially complicated for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) because of RNA splicing. A number of RNA-Seq algorithms are available, and claim to align reads with high accuracy and efficiency while detecting splice junctions. RNA-Seq data are discrete in nature; therefore, with reasonable gene models and comparative metrics RNA-Seq data can be simulated to sufficient accuracy to enable meaningful benchmarking of alignment algorithms. The exercise to rigorously compare all viable published RNA-Seq algorithms has not been performed previously. RESULTS: We developed an RNA-Seq simulator that models the main impediments to RNA alignment, including alternative splicing, insertions, deletions, substitutions, sequencing errors and intron signal. We used this simulator to measure the accuracy and robustness of available algorithms at the base and junction levels. Additionally, we used reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing to validate the ability of the algorithms to detect novel transcript features such as novel exons and alternative splicing in RNA-Seq data from mouse retina. A pipeline based on BLAT was developed to explore the performance of established tools for this problem, and to compare it to the recently developed methods. This pipeline, the RNA-Seq Unified Mapper (RUM), performs comparably to the best current aligners and provides an advantageous combination of accuracy, speed and usability. AVAILABILITY: The RUM pipeline is distributed via the Amazon Cloud and for computing clusters using the Sun Grid Engine (http://cbil.upenn.edu/RUM). CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RNA-Seq sequence reads described in the article are deposited at GEO, accession GSE26248.
Gregory R. Grant, Michael H. Farkas, Angel D. Pizarro, Nicholas F. Lahens, Jonathan Schug, Brian P. Brunk, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., John B. Hogenesch, Eric A. Pierce
Bioinform.7
2010 Annotare - a tool for annotating high-throughput biomedical investigations and resulting data
abstract
UNLABELLED: Computational methods in molecular biology will increasingly depend on standards-based annotations that describe biological experiments in an unambiguous manner. Annotare is a software tool that enables biologists to easily annotate their high-throughput experiments, biomaterials and data in a standards-compliant way that facilitates meaningful search and analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Annotare is available from http://code.google.com/p/annotare/ under the terms of the open-source MIT License (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php). It has been tested on both Mac and Windows.
Helen E. Parkinson, Tony Burdett, Emma Hastings, Junmin Liu, Michael Miller 0001, Rashmi Srinivasa, Joseph White, Alvis Brazma, Gavin Sherlock, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Catherine A. Ball
Bioinform.11
2006 The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: The generation of large amounts of microarray data and the need to share these data bring challenges for both data management and annotation and highlights the need for standards. MIAME specifies the minimum information needed to describe a microarray experiment and the Microarray Gene Expression Object Model (MAGE-OM) and resulting MAGE-ML provide a mechanism to standardize data representation for data exchange, however a common terminology for data annotation is needed to support these standards. RESULTS: Here we describe the MGED Ontology (MO) developed by the Ontology Working Group of the Microarray Gene Expression Data (MGED) Society. The MO provides terms for annotating all aspects of a microarray experiment from the design of the experiment and array layout, through to the preparation of the biological sample and the protocols used to hybridize the RNA and analyze the data. The MO was developed to provide terms for annotating experiments in line with the MIAME guidelines, i.e. to provide the semantics to describe a microarray experiment according to the concepts specified in MIAME. The MO does not attempt to incorporate terms from existing ontologies, e.g. those that deal with anatomical parts or developmental stages terms, but provides a framework to reference terms in other ontologies and therefore facilitates the use of ontologies in microarray data annotation. AVAILABILITY: The MGED Ontology version.1.2.0 is available as a file in both DAML and OWL formats at http://mged.sourceforge.net/ontologies/index.php. Release notes and annotation examples are provided. The MO is also provided via the NCICB's Enterprise Vocabulary System (http://nciterms.nci.nih.gov/NCIBrowser/Dictionary.do). CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Patricia L. Whetzel, Helen E. Parkinson, Helen C. Causton, Liju Fan, Jennifer Fostel, Gilberto Fragoso, Laurence Game, Mervi Heiskanen, Norman Morrison, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Chris F. Taylor, Joseph White, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.
Bioinform.14
2006 A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TAB
abstract
BACKGROUND: Sharing of microarray data within the research community has been greatly facilitated by the development of the disclosure and communication standards MIAME and MAGE-ML by the MGED Society. However, the complexity of the MAGE-ML format has made its use impractical for laboratories lacking dedicated bioinformatics support. RESULTS: We propose a simple tab-delimited, spreadsheet-based format, MAGE-TAB, which will become a part of the MAGE microarray data standard and can be used for annotating and communicating microarray data in a MIAME compliant fashion. CONCLUSION: MAGE-TAB will enable laboratories without bioinformatics experience or support to manage, exchange and submit well-annotated microarray data in a standard format using a spreadsheet. The MAGE-TAB format is self-contained, and does not require an understanding of MAGE-ML or XML.
Tim F. Rayner, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Paul T. Spellman, Helen C. Causton, Anna Farne, Ele Holloway, Rafael A. Irizarry, Junmin Liu, Donald Maier, Michael Miller 0001, Kjell Petersen, John Quackenbush, Gavin Sherlock, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Joseph White, Patricia L. Whetzel, Farrell Wymore, Helen E. Parkinson, Ugis Sarkans, Catherine A. Ball, Alvis Brazma
BMC Bioinform.14
2005 A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data
abstract
SUMMARY: Searching for differentially expressed genes is one of the most common applications for microarrays, yet statistically there are difficult hurdles to achieving adequate rigor and practicality. False discovery rate (FDR) approaches have become relatively standard; however, how to define and control the FDR has been hotly debated. Permutation estimation approaches such as SAM and PaGE can be effective; however, they leave much room for improvement. We pursue the permutation estimation method and describe a convenient definition for the FDR that can be estimated in a straightforward manner. We then discuss issues regarding the choice of statistic and data transformation. It is impossible to optimize the power of any statistic for thousands of genes simultaneously, and we look at the practical consequences of this. For example, the log transform can both help and hurt at the same time, depending on the gene. We examine issues surrounding the SAM 'fudge factor' parameter, and how to handle these issues by optimizing with respect to power.
Gregory R. Grant, Junmin Liu, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.
Bioinform.3
2004 An object model and database for functional genomics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Large-scale functional genomics analysis is now feasible and presents significant challenges in data analysis, storage and querying. Data standards are required to enable the development of public data repositories and to improve data sharing. There is an established data format for microarrays (microarray gene expression markup language, MAGE-ML) and a draft standard for proteomics (PEDRo). We believe that all types of functional genomics experiments should be annotated in a consistent manner, and we hope to open up new ways of comparing multiple datasets used in functional genomics. RESULTS: We have created a functional genomics experiment object model (FGE-OM), developed from the microarray model, MAGE-OM and two models for proteomics, PEDRo and our own model (Gla-PSI-Glasgow Proposal for the Proteomics Standards Initiative). FGE-OM comprises three namespaces representing (i) the parts of the model common to all functional genomics experiments; (ii) microarray-specific components; and (iii) proteomics-specific components. We believe that FGE-OM should initiate discussion about the contents and structure of the next version of MAGE and the future of proteomics standards. A prototype database called RNA And Protein Abundance Database (RAPAD), based on FGE-OM, has been implemented and populated with data from microbial pathogenesis. AVAILABILITY: FGE-OM and the RAPAD schema are available from http://www.gusdb.org/fge.html, along with a set of more detailed diagrams. RAPAD can be accessed by registration at the site.
Andrew R. Jones, Elzbieta Pustulka, Jonathan M. Wastling, Angel D. Pizarro, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.
Bioinform.5
2004 RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies
abstract
MOTIVATION: Gene expression array technology has become increasingly widespread among researchers who recognize its numerous promises. At the same time, bench biologists and bioinformaticians have come to appreciate increasingly the importance of establishing a collaborative dialog from the onset of a study and of collecting and exchanging detailed information on the many experimental and computational procedures using a structured mechanism. This is crucial for adequate analyses of this kind of data. RESULTS: The RNA Abundance Database (RAD; http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/RAD) provides a comprehensive MIAME-supportive infrastructure for gene expression data management and makes extensive use of ontologies. Specific details on protocols, biomaterials, study designs, etc. are collected through a user-friendly suite of web annotation forms. Software has been developed to generate MAGE-ML documents to enable easy export of studies stored in RAD to any other database accepting data in this format (e.g. ArrayExpress). RAD is part of a more general Genomics Unified Schema (http://www.gusdb.org), which includes a richly annotated gene index (http://www.allgenes.org), thus providing a platform that integrates genomic and transcriptomic data from multiple organisms. This infrastructure enables a large variety of queries that incorporate visualization and analysis tools and have been tailored to serve the specific needs of projects focusing on particular organisms or biological systems.
Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Junmin Liu, Matthew D. Mailman, Angel D. Pizarro, Patricia L. Whetzel, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.
Bioinform.8
2002 An open letter to the scientific journals
abstract
Catherine A. Ball, Gavin Sherlock, Helen Parkinson, Philippe Rocca-Sera, Catherine Brooksbank, Helen C. Causton, Duccio Cavalieri, Terry Gaasterland, Pascal Hin
Catherine A. Ball, Gavin Sherlock, Helen E. Parkinson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Catherine Brooksbank, Helen C. Causton, Duccio Cavalieri, Terry Gaasterland, Pascal Hingamp, Frank C. P. Holstege, Martin Ringwald, Paul T. Spellman, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Jason E. Stewart, Ronald C. Taylor, Alvis Brazma, John Quackenbush
Bioinform.13
2001 A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments
abstract
Abstract Motivation and Results: A relational schema is described for capturing highly parallel gene expression experiments using different technologies. This schema grew out of efforts to build a database for collaborators working on different biological systems and using different types of platforms in their gene expression experiments as well as different types of image quantification software. The tables are conceptually organized into three categories of information: Platform, Experiment (which includes image scanning and quantification), and Data. The strengths of the schema are: (i) integrating information on array elements using a gene index; (ii) describing samples using ontologies; (iii) reducing an experiment to a single RNA source for precise descriptions yet not losing the relationships between experiments done at the same time or for the same project; and (iv) maintaining both raw and processed (e.g. cleansed and normalized) data and recording how the data is processed. The result is a novel schema, which can hold both array and non-array data, is extensible for detailed experimental descriptions that are precise and consistent, and allows for meaningful comparisons of genes between experiments. Availability: The schema is available at http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/cgi-bin/RAD2/schemaBrowserRAD.pl. Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 2 Present address: Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Angel D. Pizarro, Elisabetta Manduchi, M. Gibson, Brian P. Brunk, Jonathan Crabtree, Jonathan Schug, Shai Shen-Orr, G. Christian Overton
Bioinform.1
2000 Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes
abstract
MOTIVATION: A protocol is described to attach expression patterns to genes represented in a collection of hybridization array experiments. Discrete values are used to provide an easily interpretable description of differential expression. Binning cutoffs for each sample type are chosen automatically, depending on the desired false-positive rate for the predictions of differential expression. Confidence levels are derived for the statement that changes in observed levels represent true changes in expression. We have a novel method for calculating this confidence, which gives better results than the standard methods. Our method reflects the broader change of focus in the field from studying a few genes with many replicates to studying many (possibly thousands) of genes simultaneously, but with relatively few replicates. Our approach differs from standard methods in that it exploits the fact that there are many genes on the arrays. These are used to estimate for each sample type an appropriate distribution that is employed to control the false-positive rate of the predictions made. Satisfactory results can be obtained using this method with as few as two replicates. RESULTS: The method is illustrated through applications to macroarray and microarray datasets. The first is an erythroid development dataset that we have generated using nylon filter arrays. Clones for genes whose expression is known in these cells were assigned expression patterns which are in accordance with what was expected and which are not picked up by the standards methods. Moreover, genes differentially expressed between normal and leukemic cells were identified. These included genes whose expression was altered upon induction of the leukemic cells to differentiate. The second application is to the microarray data by Alizadeh et al. (2000). Our results are in accordance with their major findings and offer confidence measures for the predictions made. They also provide new insights for further analysis.
Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Steven E. McKenzie, G. Christian Overton, Saul Surrey, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr.
Bioinform.6