Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chandrashekhar Nagarajan
dblp:10/6983
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Approximation and online algorithms · 73% Algorithms and data structures · 22% Mathematical optimization · 4% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
online allocation |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Ad serving using a compact allocation plan · EC 2012 SHALE: an efficient algorithm for allocation of guaranteed display advertising · KDD 2012 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › dynamic approximation
incremental approximation |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | A General Approach for Incremental Approximation and Hierarchical Clustering · SIAM J. Comput. 2010 A general approach for incremental approximation and hierarchical clustering · SODA 2006 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ad serving using a compact allocation plan · EC 2012 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A General Approach for Incremental Approximation and Hierarchical Clustering · SIAM J. Comput. 2010 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-median |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A General Approach for Incremental Approximation and Hierarchical Clustering · SIAM J. Comput. 2010 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › network design
k-MST |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A General Approach for Incremental Approximation and Hierarchical Clustering · SIAM J. Comput. 2010 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A general approach for incremental approximation and hierarchical clustering · SODA 2006 |
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A general approach for incremental approximation and hierarchical clustering · SODA 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Ad serving using a compact allocation plan · EC 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear programming · 0.3incremental approximation · 0.2randomized rounding · 0.1primal-dual · 0.1forecasting · 0.1approximation algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | SHALE: an efficient algorithm for allocation of guaranteed display advertisingabstractMotivated by the problem of optimizing allocation in guaranteed display advertising, we develop an efficient, lightweight method of generating a compact allocation plan that can be used to guide ad server decisions. The plan itself uses just O(1) state per guaranteed contract, is robust to noise, and allows us to serve (provably) nearly optimally. Vijay Bharadwaj, Peiji Chen, Wenjing Ma, Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, John A. Tomlin, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Erik Vee, Jian Yang 0002 |
KDD | 4 |
| 2012 | Ad serving using a compact allocation planabstractA large fraction of online display advertising is sold via guaranteed contracts: a publisher guarantees to the advertiser a certain number of user visits satisfying the targeting predicates of the contract. The publisher is then tasked with solving the ad serving problem ---given a user visit, which of the thousands of matching contracts should be displayed, so that by the expiration time every contract has obtained the requisite number of user visits. The challenges of the problem come from (1) the sheer size of the problem being solved, with tens of thousands of contracts and billions of user visits, (2) the unpredictability of user behavior, since these contracts are sold months ahead of time, when only a forecast of user visits is available and (3) the minute amount of resources available online, as an ad server must respond with a matching contract in a fraction of a second. Peiji Chen, Wenjing Ma, Srinath Mandalapu, Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, Jayavel Shanmugasundaram, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Erik Vee, Manfai Yu, Jason Y. Zien |
EC | 4 |
| 2011 | An Experimental Evaluation of Incremental and Hierarchical k-Median Algorithms
Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, David P. Williamson |
SEA | 1 |
| 2010 | A General Approach for Incremental Approximation and Hierarchical ClusteringabstractWe present a general framework and algorithmic approach for incremental approximation algorithms. The framework handles cardinality constrained minimization problems, such as the k-median and k-MST problems. Given some notion of ordering on solutions of different cardinalities k, we give solutions for all values of k such that the solutions respect the ordering and such that for any k, our solution is close in value to the value of an optimal solution of cardinality k. For instance, for the k-median problem, the notion of ordering is set inclusion, and our incremental algorithm produces solutions such that for any k and $k'$, $k Guolong Lin, Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, Rajmohan Rajaraman, David P. Williamson |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2008 | Offline and Online Facility Leasing
Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, David P. Williamson |
IPCO | 1 |
| 2008 | Approximation Algorithms for Prize-Collecting Network Design Problems with General Connectivity Requirements
Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, Yogeshwer Sharma, David P. Williamson |
WAOA | 1 |
| 2007 | Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower's perspectiveabstractWe consider the problem faced by a company that wants to use viral marketing to introduce a new product into a market where a competing product is already being introduced. We assume that consumers will use only one of the two products and will influence their friends in their decision of which product to use. We propose two models for the spread of influence of competing technologies through a social network and consider the influence maximization problem from the follower's perspective. In particular we assume the follower has a fixed budget available that can be used to target a subset of consumers and show that, although it is NP-hard to select the most influential subset to target, it is possible to give an efficient algorithm that is within 63% of optimal. Our computational experiments show that by using knowledge of the social network and the set of consumers targeted by the competitor, the follower may in fact capture a majority of the market by targeting a relatively small set of the right consumers. Tim Carnes, Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, Stefan M. Wild, Anke van Zuylen |
ICEC | 2 |
| 2006 | A general approach for incremental approximation and hierarchical clustering
Guolong Lin, Chandrashekhar Nagarajan, Rajmohan Rajaraman, David P. Williamson |
SODA | 2 |