Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roman Smolensky
dblp:10/722
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 17 · 6 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
8 papers |
Computational complexity · 86% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 6% Algorithms and data structures · 4% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
circuit complexity |
0.0 | 5 | 1993 | On Representations by Low-Degree Polynomials · FOCS 1993 Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral Norms · SIAM J. Comput. 1992 On Interpolation by Analytic Functions with Special Properties and Some Weak Lower Bounds on the Size of Circuits with Symmetric Gates · FOCS 1990 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | A Lower Bound for Randomized Algebraic Decision Trees · STOC 1996 Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral Norms · SIAM J. Comput. 1992 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit lower bounds |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | On Representations by Low-Degree Polynomials · FOCS 1993 On Interpolation by Analytic Functions with Special Properties and Some Weak Lower Bounds on the Size of Circuits with Symmetric Gates · FOCS 1990 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › constant-depth circuits
AC0 |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral Norms · SIAM J. Comput. 1992 Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions and Spectral Norms (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Computational complexity › boolean function analysis
polynomial threshold function |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral Norms · SIAM J. Comput. 1992 Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions and Spectral Norms (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity › algebraic computation tree
algebraic decision trees |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Lower Bound for Randomized Algebraic Decision Trees · STOC 1996 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
threshold circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral Norms · SIAM J. Comput. 1992 |
Computational complexity
algebraic complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Lower Bounds for Polynomial Evaluation and Interpolation Problems · FOCS 1991 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
arithmetic circuit lower bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Lower Bounds for Polynomial Evaluation and Interpolation Problems · FOCS 1991 |
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
polynomial evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Lower Bounds for Polynomial Evaluation and Interpolation Problems · FOCS 1991 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
random walk |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | The Electrical Resistance of a Graph Captures its Commute and Cover Times (Detailed Abstract) · STOC 1989 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › circuit lower bounds
boolean circuit lower bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Algebraic Methods in the Theory of Lower Bounds for Boolean Circuit Complexity · STOC 1987 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
randomness extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | The Bit Extraction Problem of t-Resilient Functions (Preliminary Version) · FOCS 1985 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
hilbert function |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On Representations by Low-Degree Polynomials · FOCS 1993 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › constant-depth circuits
modular circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | On Interpolation by Analytic Functions with Special Properties and Some Weak Lower Bounds on the Size of Circuits with Symmetric Gates · FOCS 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral norm · 0.0harmonic analysis · 0.0projective space embedding · 0.0polynomial approximation · 0.0depth-size tradeoff · 0.0algebraic program lower bound · 0.0dimension argument · 0.0analytic interpolation · 0.0spectral methods · 0.0electrical resistance analogy · 0.0lower and upper bounds · 0.0adversarial bit fixing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | The Electrical Resistance of a Graph Captures its Commute and Cover Times
Ashok K. Chandra, Prabhakar Raghavan, Walter L. Ruzzo, Roman Smolensky, Prasoon Tiwari |
Comput. Complex. | 4 |
| 1997 | A Lower Bound for Randomized Algebraic Decision Trees
Dima Grigoriev, Marek Karpinski, Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide, Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 4 |
| 1997 | Randomization and the Computational Power of Analytic and Algebraic Decision Trees
Dima Grigoriev, Marek Karpinski, Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 3 |
| 1997 | Lower Bounds for Polynomial Evaluation and Interpolation Problems
Victor Shoup, Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 2 |
| 1997 | Representations of Sets of Boolean Functions by Commutative Rings
Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 1 |
| 1997 | Easy Lower Bound for a Strange Computational Model
Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 1 |
| 1997 | Well-Known Bound for the VC-Dimension Made Easy
Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 1 |
| 1996 | A Lower Bound for Randomized Algebraic Decision TreesabstractArticle Free Access Share on A lower bound for randomized algebraic decision trees Authors: Dima Grigoriev Dept. of Computer Science and Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park Dept. of Computer Science and Mathematics, Penn State University, University ParkView Profile , Marek Karpinski Dept. of Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53117, Bonn Dept. of Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53117, BonnView Profile , Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide Heinz Nixdorf Institute and Computer Science Department, University of Paderborn, 33098 Paderborn Heinz Nixdorf Institute and Computer Science Department, University of Paderborn, 33098 PaderbornView Profile , Roman Smolensky Dept. of Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53117, Bonn Dept. of Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53117, BonnView Profile Authors Info & Claims STOC '96: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of ComputingJuly 1996 Pages 612–619https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.238011Published:01 July 1996Publication History 12citation385DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations12Total Downloads385Last 12 Months13Last 6 weeks3 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF Dima Grigoriev, Marek Karpinski, Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide, Roman Smolensky |
STOC | 4 |
| 1993 | On Representations by Low-Degree PolynomialsabstractIn the first part of the paper we show that a subset S of a boolean cube B/sub n/ embedded in the projective space P/sup n/ can be approximated by a subset of B/sub n/ defined by nonzeroes of a low-degree polynomial only if the values of the Hilbert function of S are sufficiently small relative to the size of S. The use of this property provides a simple and direct technique for proving lower bounds on the size of ACC[p/sup r/] circuits. In the second part we look at the problem of computing many-output function by ACC[p/sup r/] circuit and give an example when such a circuit can be correct only at exponentially small fraction of assignments.> Roman Smolensky |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1993 | On Lower Bounds for Read-K-Times Branching Programs
Allan Borodin, Alexander A. Razborov, Roman Smolensky |
Comput. Complex. | 3 |
| 1992 | Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions, and Spectral NormsabstractThis paper examines the class of polynomial threshold functions using harmonic analysis and applies the results to derive lower bounds related to $AC^0 $ functions. A Boolean function is polynomial threshold if it can be represented as the sign of a sparse polynomial (one that consists of a polynomial number of terms). The main result of this paper is that the class of polynomial threshold functions can be characterized using their spectral representation. In particular, it is proved that an n-variable Boolean function whose $L_1 $ spectral norm is bounded by a polynomial in n is a polynomial threshold function, while Boolean function whose $L_\infty ^{ - 1} $ spectral norm is not bounded by a polynomial in n is not a polynomial threshold function [J. Bruck, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 3 (1990), pp. 168–177]. The motivation is that the characterization of polynomial threshold functions can be applied to obtain upper and lower bounds on the complexity of computing with networks of linear threshold elements. In this paper results related to the complexity of computing $AC^0 $ functions are presented. More applications of the characterization theorem are presented in [J. Bruck, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 3 (1990), pp. 168–177] and [K. Y. Siu and J. Bruck, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 4 (1991), pp. 423–435]. Jehoshua Bruck, Roman Smolensky |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 1991 | Lower Bounds for Polynomial Evaluation and Interpolation ProblemsabstractIt is shown that there is a set of points p/sub 1/, p/sub 2/,. . .,p/sub n/ such that any algebraic program of depth d for polynomial evaluation (or interpolation) at these points has size Omega (n log n/log d). Moreover, if d is a constant, then a lower bound of Omega (n/sup 1+1/d/) is obtained.> Victor Shoup, Roman Smolensky |
FOCS | 2 |
| 1990 | Polynomial Threshold Functions, AC^0 Functions and Spectral Norms (Extended Abstract)abstractThe class of polynomial-threshold functions is studied using harmonic analysis, and the results are used to derive lower bounds related to AC/sup 0/ functions. A Boolean function is polynomial threshold if it can be represented as a sign function of a sparse polynomial (one that consists of a polynomial number of terms). The main result is that polynomial-threshold functions can be characterized by means of their spectral representation. In particular, it is proved that a Boolean function whose L/sub 1/ spectral norm is bounded by a polynomial in n is a polynomial-threshold function, and that a Boolean function whose L/sub infinity //sup -1/ spectral norm is not bounded by a polynomial in n is not a polynomial-threshold function. Some results for AC/sup 0/ functions are derived.> Jehoshua Bruck, Roman Smolensky |
FOCS | 2 |
| 1990 | On Interpolation by Analytic Functions with Special Properties and Some Weak Lower Bounds on the Size of Circuits with Symmetric GatesabstractThe author investigates the question of whether or not a specific Boolean function in n variables can be interpolated by an analytic function in the same variables whose partial derivatives of all orders span a subspace of low dimension in the space of analytic functions. The upper and lower bounds for this dimension yield some weak circuit lower bounds. For a particular function, an Omega (n/log n)-size lower bound is obtained for its computation by a circuit whose gates are symmetric. For the same function an Omega (n) lower bound is obtained for the circuit with mod/sub k/ gates.> Roman Smolensky |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1989 | The Electrical Resistance of a Graph Captures its Commute and Cover Times (Detailed Abstract)abstractView an n-vertex, m-edge undirected graph as an electrical network with unit resistors as edges. We extend known relations between random walks and electrical networks by showing that resistance in this network is intimately connected with the lengths of random walks on the graph. For example, the commute time between two vertices s and t (the expected length of a random walk from s to t and back) is precisely characterized by the effective resistance Rst between s and t: commute time = 2mRst. Additionally, the cover time (the expected length of a random walk visiting all vertices) is characterized by the maximum resistance R in the graph to within a factor of log n: mR ≤ cover time ≤ O (mR log n). For many graphs, the bounds on cover time obtained in this manner are better than those obtained from previous techniques such as the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix. In particular, using this approach, we improve known bounds on cover times for various classes of graphs, including high-degree graphs, expanders, and multi-dimensional meshes. Moreover, resistance seems to provide an intuitively appealing and tractable approach to these problems. Ashok K. Chandra, Prabhakar Raghavan, Walter L. Ruzzo, Roman Smolensky, Prasoon Tiwari |
STOC | 4 |
| 1987 | Algebraic Methods in the Theory of Lower Bounds for Boolean Circuit ComplexityabstractWe use algebraic methods to get lower bounds for complexity of different functions based on constant depth unbounded fan-in circuits with the given set of basic operations. In particular, we prove that depth k circuits with gates NOT, OR and MODp where p is a prime require Exp(Ο(n1/2k)) gates to calculate MODr functions for any r ≠ pm. This statement contains as special cases Yao's PARITY result [ Ya 85 ] and Razborov's new MAJORITY result [Ra 86] (MODm gate is an oracle which outputs zero, if the number of ones is divisible by m). Roman Smolensky |
STOC | 1 |
| 1985 | The Bit Extraction Problem of t-Resilient Functions (Preliminary Version)abstractWe consider the following adversarial situation. Let n, m and t be arbitrary integers, and let f : {0, 1}n → {0, 1}m be a function. An adversary, knowing the function f, sets t of the n input bits, while the rest (n-t input, bits) are chosen at random (independently and with uniform probability distribution) The adversary tries to prevent the outcome of f from being uniformly distributed in {0, 1}m. The question addressed is for what values of n, m and t does the adversary necessarily fail in biasing the outcome of f : {0,1}n → {0, 1}m, when being restricted to set t of the input bits of f. We present various lower and upper bounds on m's allowing an affirmative answer. These bounds are relatively close for t ≤ n/3 and for t ≥ 2n/3. Our results have applications in the fields of faulttolerance and cryptography. Benny Chor, Oded Goldreich 0001, Johan Håstad, Joel Friedman, Steven Rudich, Roman Smolensky |
FOCS | 6 |