Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lior Libis

dblp:10/7450 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 91% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification
0.112009
Shortening the verification cycle with synthesizable abstract models · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112009
Shortening the verification cycle with synthesizable abstract models · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
simulation-based verification
0.112009
Shortening the verification cycle with synthesizable abstract models · DAC 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprocessor design
0.012009
Shortening the verification cycle with synthesizable abstract models · DAC 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systemverilog · 0.1synthesizable abstract models · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Shortening the verification cycle with synthesizable abstract models
abstract
Abstract modeling has been widely used, albeit independently, for both formal verification and high-level modeling of SoC designs. In this paper we show that proper selection of modeling language and abstraction level can make the same code useful for both formal and simulation-based techniques. The abstract model enables architecture exploration and the development of verification collateral pre-RTL, and can be used as a behavioral checker in simulation against the RTL and in hardware emulation. In parallel, it enables applying formal verification techniques to verify the specification and implementation of the design. We provide examples of the successful application of abstract models developed in SystemVerilog in the course of the verification of the newest Intel® Core™ microprocessor.
Alon Gluska, Lior Libis
DAC2