Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Schwencker

dblp:11/2930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 56% Integrated circuit design · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits
analog circuit design
0.012001
Mismatch Analysis and Direct Yield Optimization by Spec-Wise Linearization and Feasibility-Guided Search · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation › design for manufacturability › design for yield
yield enhancement
0.012001
Mismatch Analysis and Direct Yield Optimization by Spec-Wise Linearization and Feasibility-Guided Search · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation › design for manufacturability
design for yield
0.012001
Mismatch Analysis and Direct Yield Optimization by Spec-Wise Linearization and Feasibility-Guided Search · DAC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spec-wise linearization · 0.0feasibility-guided search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 TLM+ modeling of embedded HW/SW systems
abstract
Virtual Prototypes (VPs) based on Transaction Level Modeling (TLM) have become a de-facto standard in today's SoC design, enabling early SW development. However, due to the growing complexity of SoC architectures full system simulations (HW+SW) become a bottleneck reducing this benefit. Hence, it is necessary to develop modeling styles which allow for further abstraction beyond the currently applied TLM methodology. This paper introduces such a modeling style, referred to as TLM+. It enables a higher modeling abstraction through merging hardware dependent driver software at the lowest level with the HW interface. Thus, sequences of HW transactions can be merged to single HW/SW transactions while preserving both the HW architecture and the low-level to high-level SW interfaces. In order to maintain the ability to validate timing-critical paths, a new resource model concept is introduced which compensates the loss of timing information, induced by merging HW transactions. Experimental results show a speed-up of up to 1000x at a timing error of approximately 10%.
Wolfgang Ecker, Volkan Esen, Robert Schwencker, Thomas Steininger, Michael Velten
DATE3
2002 Analog Circuit Sizing Using Adaptive Worst-Case Parameter Sets
abstract
In this paper a method for nominal design of analog integrated circuits is presented that includes process variations and operating ranges by worst-case parameter sets. These sets are calculated adaptively during the sizing process based on sensitivity analyses. The method leads to robust designs with high parametric yield, while being much more efficient than design centering methods.
Robert Schwencker, Frank Schenkel, Michael Pronath, Helmut E. Graeb
DATE1
2001 Mismatch Analysis and Direct Yield Optimization by Spec-Wise Linearization and Feasibility-Guided Search
abstract
We present a new method for mismatch analysis and automatic yield optimization of analog integrated circuits with respect to global, local and operational tolerances. Effectiveness and efficiency of yield estimation and optimization are guaranteed by consideration of feasibility regions and by performance linearization at worst-case points. The proposed methods were successfully applied to two example circuits for an industrial fabrication process. 1.
Frank Schenkel, Michael Pronath, Stephan Zizala, Robert Schwencker, Helmut E. Graeb, Kurt Antreich
DAC4
2000 The Generalized Boundary Curve-A Common Method for Automatic Nominal Design and Design Centering of Analog Circuits
abstract
In this paper a new method for analog circuit sizing with respect to manufacturing and operating tolerances is presented. Two types of robustness objectives are presented, i.e. parameter distances for the nominal design and worst case distances for the design centering. Moreover, the generalized boundary curve is presented as a method to determine a parameter correction within an iterative trust region algorithm. Results show that a significant reduction in computational costs is achieved using the presented robustness objectives and generalized boundary curve.
Robert Schwencker, Frank Schenkel, Helmut E. Graeb, Kurt Antreich
DATE1
1999 Automating the Sizing of Analog CMOS Circuits by Consideration of Structural Constraints
abstract
In this paper a method for the automatic sizing of analog integrated circuits is presented. Basic sizing rules, representing circuit knowledge, are set up before the sizing and are introduced as structural constraints into the sizing process. Systematic consideration of these structural constraints during the automatic sizing prevents pathologically sized circuits and speeds up the automatic sizing. The sizing is done with a sensitivity-based, iterative trust region method.
Robert Schwencker, Josef Eckmüller, Helmut E. Graeb, Kurt Antreich
DATE1