Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Wollowski

dblp:11/4028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6596-8635ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Computing education · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 66% Language models and text generation · 34%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
AI education
1.952025
Towards an AI Course Based on Neural Networks · AAAI 2025
Model AI Assignments 2019 · AAAI 2019
A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › neuro-symbolic AI
knowledge representation in neural networks
0.312025
Towards an AI Course Based on Neural Networks · AAAI 2025
Computing education › curriculum design
course design
0.212014
Teaching With Watson · AAAI 2014
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
question answering systems
0.122016
Training Watson - A Cognitive Systems Course · AAAI 2016
Teaching With Watson · AAAI 2014
Computing education
computing education research
0.112016
A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pattern matching · 1.7feature learning · 1.7project-based learning · 0.5competition-based learning · 0.4survey methodology · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards an AI Course Based on Neural Networks
abstract
In a prior paper, we argued that Artificial Intelligence (AI) should be placed on a different foundation, one based on pattern recognition and feature learning rather than symbol manipulation and feature engineering. In this paper, we provide a proof of concept of an AI course that follows that proposed approach. Students study how these systems become so incredibly powerful through machine learning of features and through pattern matching. Students learn how those systems represent knowledge and they study their currently limited reasoning abilities. Students spend time discussing the accomplishments of current systems, positive as well as negative and they study the projected impact of anticipated systems. In this paper, we give a brief argument of why one would want to offer such a course. We present a detailed outline of the contents of such a course, together with learning materials and their proposed use. We summarize relevant anonymous student feedback and offer a subjective evaluation of the pilot course.
Michael Wollowski
AAAI1
2019 Model AI Assignments 2019
abstract
The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of ten AI assignments from the 2019 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http: //modelai.gettysburg.edu.
Todd W. Neller, Raja Sooriamurthi, Michael Guerzhoy, Lisa Zhang 0003, Paul G. Talaga, Christopher Archibald, Adam Summerville, Joseph C. Osborn, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Nate Derbinsky, Elena Strange, Marion Neumann, Jonathan Chen, Zac Christensen, Michael Wollowski, Oscar Youngquist
AAAI18
2016 Training Watson - A Cognitive Systems Course
abstract
We developed a course in which students train an instance of Watson and develop an application that interacts with the trained instance. Additionally, students learn technical in-formation about the Jeopardy! version of Watson and they discuss a future infused with cognitive assistants. In this poster, we justify this course, characterize major assessment items and provide advice on choosing a domain.
Michael Wollowski
AAAI1
2016 A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI
abstract
The field of AI has changed significantly in the past couple of years and will likely continue to do so. Driven by a desire to expose our students to relevant and modern materials, we conducted two surveys, one of AI instructors and one of AI practitioners. The surveys were aimed at gathering infor-mation about the current state of the art of introducing AI as well as gathering input from practitioners in the field on techniques used in practice. In this paper, we present and briefly discuss the responses to those two surveys.
Michael Wollowski, Robert Selkowitz, Laura E. Brown, Ashok K. Goel 0001, George Luger, Jim Marshall, Andrew Neel, Todd W. Neller, Peter Norvig
AAAI1
2014 Teaching With Watson
abstract
In this paper, we describe how we integrated the materials from the 2013 IBM The Great Minds Challenge (TGMC) - Watson Technical Edition into our Introductory Artificial Intelligence course. We describe the variety of materials made available by IBM, as well as the nature of the competition and the datasets that are at the heart of it. We detail how, where and in what form we integrated the materials into our course. We describe assignments that are based on the materials from the competition as well as additional materials we incorporated into our course. We finish by evaluating our experience in teaching with the materials as well as summarize relevant student feedback. We make recommendations for those who wish to adopt the materials.
Michael Wollowski
AAAI1
2011 Knowledge servers for the classroom
abstract
We describe a knowledge-server we developed for our data structures course. This server holds information traditionally contained in textbooks. Additionally, it houses information that is not easily contained in textbooks, such as animations and presentation slides of important concepts. It furthermore references materials from diverse sources available on the World Wide Web. In addition to course materials, the server makes available a variety of ways in which to navigate the information. In addition to searching concepts and a directory listing of concepts, it makes available a navigable graph, representing the ontology of the course materials. This enables students to more quickly find information and to better see relationships between materials introduced in the course. We see knowledge servers as taking the role of textbooks in the not so distant future.
Michael Wollowski, Kevin Risden
FIE1
2000 Introducing computer science using a breadth-first approach and functional programming
abstract
We present a breadth-first, lecture-and lab-based approach to introducing Computer Science that uses functional programming.Functional programming provides a lowoverhead introduction to programming (no types, few constructs, and little syntax), enabling students to write, in their first semester, programs sophisticated enough to exemplify important concepts of Computer Science.It also encourages good programming style (modular design and testing, e.g.) and serves as an introduction to an important problem-solving paradigm.The course gives the students a broad overview of Computer Science and helps them gauge their interest in the field.
Scott L. Vandenberg, Michael Wollowski
SIGCSE2
1989 A Schema for an Integrated Learning System
Michael Wollowski
ML1