Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kurt Godden

dblp:11/4625 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 78% Information extraction and text analysis · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems
0.012004
The General Motors Variation-Reduction Adviser: Deployment Issues for an AI Application · AAAI 2004
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011990
Lazy Unification · ACL 1990
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
unification-based parsing
0.011990
Lazy Unification · ACL 1990
Data models and query languages
natural language interface
0.011985
Portability of Syntax and Semantics in Datalog · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unification algorithm · 0.0natural language processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 The General Motors Variation-Reduction Adviser: Deployment Issues for an AI Application
Alexander P. Morgan, John A. Cafeo, Kurt Godden, Ronald M. Lesperance, Andrea M. Simon, Deborah L. McGuinness, James L. Benedict
AAAI3
1991 Feature-based design evaluation through constraint structure unification
abstract
Constraint structures are presented as a new knowledge structure to encode both engineering part designs and constraints on those designs. Using a common representational form for both designs and constraints results in a number of practical advantages for a design evaluation system grounded on constraint structures. First, a graph unification algorithm generalized to operate on constraint structures is used as a mathematically elegant means of applying constraints to designs. As a side-effect of constraint structure unification, constraints are attached to design representations. Once the constraints become a part of the design representation, a part is able automatically to reevaluate relevant constraints following interactive changes to design parameters without re-invoking the unification algorithm.>
Kurt Godden
ICTAI1
1990 Lazy Unification
abstract
Unification-based NL parsers that copy argument graphs to prevent their destruction suffer from inefficiency. Copying is the most expensive operation in such parsers, and several methods to reduce copying have been devised with varying degrees of success. Lazy Unification is presented here as a new, conceptually elegant solution that reduces copying by nearly an order of magnitude. Lazy Unification requires no new slots in the structure of nodes, and only nominal revisions to the unification algorithm.
Kurt Godden
ACL1
1985 Portability of Syntax and Semantics in Datalog
abstract
This paper presents a discussion of the techniques developed and problems encountered during the design, implementation, and experimental use of a portable natural language processor. Datalog (for “database dialogue") is an experimental natural language query system, which was designed to achieve a maximum degree of portability and extendibility. Datalog uses a three-level architecture to provide both portability of syntax to new and extended tasks and portability of semantics to new database applications. The implementation of each of the three levels, the structures and conventions that control the interactions among them, and the way in which different aspects of the design contribute to portability are described. Finally, two specific, implemented examples are presented, showing how it was possible to transport or extend Datalog by changing only one “layer” of the system's knowledge and achieve correct processing of the extended input by the entire system.
Carole D. Hafner, Kurt Godden
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.2