Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel B. Russakoff
dblp:11/5573
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-5713-1242ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 70% Rendering · 30% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image similarity |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Image Similarity Using Mutual Information of Regions · ECCV (3) 2004 |
Image and video processing › image registration
mutual information |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Image Similarity Using Mutual Information of Regions · ECCV (3) 2004 |
Medical and health informatics › medical image registration
2d/3d registration |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Fast Intensity-based 2D-3D Image Registration of Clinical Data Using Light Fields · ICCV 2003 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Fast Intensity-based 2D-3D Image Registration of Clinical Data Using Light Fields · ICCV 2003 |
Rendering › image-based rendering
light field rendering |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Fast Intensity-based 2D-3D Image Registration of Clinical Data Using Light Fields · ICCV 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ray casting · 0.1light field rendering · 0.1intensity-based registration · 0.1mutual information · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | A Unified Graphical Models Framework for Automated Mitosis Detection in Human EmbryosabstractTime lapse microscopy has emerged as an important modality for studying human embryo development, as mitosis events can provide insight into embryo health and fate. Mitosis detection can happen through tracking of embryonic cells (tracking based), or from low level image features and classifiers (tracking free). Tracking based approaches are challenged by high dimensional search space, weak features, outliers, missing data, multiple deformable targets, and weak motion model. Tracking free approaches are data driven and complement tracking based approaches. We pose mitosis detection as augmented simultaneous segmentation and classification in a conditional random field (CRF) framework that combines both approaches. It uses a rich set of discriminative features and their spatiotemporal context. It performs a dual pass approximate inference that addresses the high dimensionality of tracking and combines results from both components. For 312 clinical sequences we measured division events to within 30 min and observed an improvement of 25.6% and a 32.9% improvement over purely tracking based and tracking free approach respectively, and close to an order of magnitude over a traditional particle filter. While our work was motivated by human embryo development, it can be extended to other detection problems in image sequences of evolving cell populations. Farshid Moussavi, Yu Wang 0032, Peter Lorenzen, Jonathan Oakley 0002, Daniel B. Russakoff, Stephen Gould |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 5 |
| 2006 | Generation and Application of a Probabilistic Breast Cancer Atlas
Daniel B. Russakoff, Akira Hasegawa |
MICCAI (2) | 1 |
| 2005 | Markerless real-time 3-D target region tracking by motion backprojection from projection imagesabstractAccurate and fast localization of a predefined target region inside the patient is an important component of many image-guided therapy procedures. This problem is commonly solved by registration of intraoperative 2-D projection images to 3-D preoperative images. If the patient is not fixed during the intervention, the 2-D image acquisition is repeated several times during the procedure, and the registration problem can be cast instead as a 3-D tracking problem. To solve the 3-D problem, we propose in this paper to apply 2-D region tracking to first recover the components of the transformation that are in-plane to the projections. The 2-D motion estimates of all projections are backprojected into 3-D space, where they are then combined into a consistent estimate of the 3-D motion. We compare this method to intensity-based 2-D to 3-D registration and a combination of 2-D motion backprojection followed by a 2-D to 3-D registration stage. Using clinical data with a fiducial marker-based gold-standard transformation, we show that our method is capable of accurately tracking vertebral targets in 3-D from 2-D motion measured in X-ray projection images. Using a standard tracking algorithm (hyperplane tracking), tracking is achieved at video frame rates but fails relatively often (32% of all frames tracked with target registration error (TRE) better than 1.2 mm, 82% of all frames tracked with TRE better than 2.4 mm). With intensity-based 2-D to 2-D image registration using normalized mutual information (NMI) and pattern intensity (PI), accuracy and robustness are substantially improved. NMI tracked 82% of all frames in our data with TRE better than 1.2 mm and 96% of all frames with TRE better than 2.4 mm. This comes at the cost of a reduced frame rate, 1.7 s average processing time per frame and projection device. Results using PI were slightly more accurate, but required on average 5.4 s time per frame. These results are still substantially faster than 2-D to 3-D registration. We conclude that motion backprojection from 2-D motion tracking is an accurate and efficient method for tracking 3-D target motion, but tracking 2-D motion accurately and robustly remains a challenge. Torsten Rohlfing, Joachim Denzler, Christoph Gräßl, Daniel B. Russakoff, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 4 |
| 2005 | Fast generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs using attenuation fields with application to 2D-3D image registrationabstractGeneration of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) is computationally expensive and is typically the rate-limiting step in the execution time of intensity-based two-dimensional to three-dimensional (2D-3D) registration algorithms. We address this computational issue by extending the technique of light field rendering from the computer graphics community. The extension of light fields, which we call attenuation fields (AFs), allows most of the DRR computation to be performed in a preprocessing step; after this precomputation step, DRRs can be generated substantially faster than with conventional ray casting. We derive expressions for the physical sizes of the two planes of an AF necessary to generate DRRs for a given X-ray camera geometry and all possible object motion within a specified range. Because an AF is a ray-based data structure, it is substantially more memory efficient than a huge table of precomputed DRRs because it eliminates the redundancy of replicated rays. Nonetheless, an AF can require substantial memory, which we address by compressing it using vector quantization. We compare DRRs generated using AFs (AF-DRRs) to those generated using ray casting (RC-DRRs) for a typical C-arm geometry and computed tomography images of several anatomic regions. They are quantitatively very similar: the median peak signal-to-noise ratio of AF-DRRs versus RC-DRRs is greater than 43 dB in all cases. We perform intensity-based 2D-3D registration using AF-DRRs and RC-DRRs and evaluate registration accuracy using gold-standard clinical spine image data from four patients. The registration accuracy and robustness of the two methods is virtually identical whereas the execution speed using AF-DRRs is an order of magnitude faster. Daniel B. Russakoff, Torsten Rohlfing, Kensaku Mori, Daniel Rueckert, Anthony Ho, John R. Adler Jr., Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 1 |
| 2004 | Image Similarity Using Mutual Information of Regions
Daniel B. Russakoff, Carlo Tomasi, Torsten Rohlfing, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
ECCV (3) | 1 |
| 2004 | Progressive Attenuation Fields: Fast 2D-3D Image Registration Without Precomputation
Torsten Rohlfing, Daniel B. Russakoff, Joachim Denzler, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
MICCAI (1) | 2 |
| 2004 | Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimationabstractIt is well known in the pattern recognition community that the accuracy of classifications obtained by combining decisions made by independent classifiers can be substantially higher than the accuracy of the individual classifiers. We have previously shown this to be true for atlas-based segmentation of biomedical images. The conventional method for combining individual classifiers weights each classifier equally (vote or sum rule fusion). In this paper, we propose two methods that estimate the performances of the individual classifiers and combine the individual classifiers by weighting them according to their estimated performance. The two methods are multiclass extensions of an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for ground truth estimation of binary classification based on decisions of multiple experts (Warfield et al., 2004). The first method performs parameter estimation independently for each class with a subsequent integration step. The second method considers all classes simultaneously. We demonstrate the efficacy of these performance-based fusion methods by applying them to atlas-based segmentations of three-dimensional confocal microscopy images of bee brains. In atlas-based image segmentation, multiple classifiers arise naturally by applying different registration methods to the same atlas, or the same registration method to different atlases, or both. We perform a validation study designed to quantify the success of classifier combination methods in atlas-based segmentation. By applying random deformations, a given ground truth atlas is transformed into multiple segmentations that could result from imperfect registrations of an image to multiple atlas images. In a second evaluation study, multiple actual atlas-based segmentations are combined and their accuracies computed by comparing them to a manual segmentation. We demonstrate in both evaluation studies that segmentations produced by combining multiple individual registration-based segmentations are more accurate for the two classifier fusion methods we propose, which weight the individual classifiers according to their EM-based performance estimates, than for simple sum rule fusion, which weights each classifier equally. Torsten Rohlfing, Daniel B. Russakoff, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 2 |
| 2003 | Fast Intensity-based 2D-3D Image Registration of Clinical Data Using Light FieldsabstractRegistration of a preoperative CT (3D) image to one or more X-ray projection (2D) images, a special case of the pose estimation problem, has been attempted in a variety of ways with varying degrees of success. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in intensity-based methods. One of the drawbacks to such methods is the need to create digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) at each step of the optimization process. DRRs are typically generated by ray casting, an operation that requires O(n/sup 3/) time, where we assume that n is approximately the size (in voxels) of one side of the DRR as well as one side of the CT volume. We address this issue by extending light field rendering techniques from the computer graphics community to generate DRRs instead of conventional rendered images. Using light fields allows most of the computation to be performed in a preprocessing step; after this precomputation, very accurate DRRs can be generated in O(n/sup 2/) time. Another important issue for 2D-3D registration algorithms is validation. Previously reported 2D-3D registration algorithms were validated using synthetic data or phantoms but not clinical data. We present an intensity-based 2D-3D registration system that generates DRRs using light fields; we validate its performance using clinical data with a known gold standard transformation. Daniel B. Russakoff, Torsten Rohlfing, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2003 | Extraction and Application of Expert Priors to Combine Multiple Segmentations of Human Brain Tissue
Torsten Rohlfing, Daniel B. Russakoff, Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
MICCAI (2) | 2 |
| 2003 | Intensity-Based 2D-3D Spine Image Registration Incorporating One Fiducial Marker
Daniel B. Russakoff, Torsten Rohlfing, Ramin Shahidi, Daniel H. Kim, John R. Adler Jr., Calvin R. Maurer Jr. |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2002 | Head tracking using stereo
Daniel B. Russakoff, Martin Herman |
Mach. Vis. Appl. | 1 |
| 2000 | Head tracking using stereoabstractHead tracking is an important primitive for smart environments and perceptual user interfaces where the poses and movements of body parts need to be determined. Most previous solutions to this problem are based on intensity images and, as a result, suffer from a host of problems including sensitivity to background clutter and lighting variations. Our approach avoids these pitfalls by using stereo depth data together with a simple human torso model to create a head tracking system that is both fast and robust. We use stereo data to derive a depth model of the background which is then employed to provide accurate foreground segmentation. We then use directed local edge detectors on the foreground to find occluding edges which are used as features to fit to a torso model. Once we have the model parameters, the location and orientation of the head can be easily estimated. A useful side effect from using stereo data is the ability to track head movement through a room in three dimensions. Experimental results on real image sequences are given. Daniel B. Russakoff, Martin Herman |
WACV | 1 |