Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Li 0098
dblp:116/1011-98
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 48% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Generative modeling · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action segmentation |
1.8 | 4 | 2021 | Action Shuffle Alternating Learning for Unsupervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 Anchor-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 Set-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action segmentation
weakly supervised action segmentation |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Anchor-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 Set-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2020 Weakly Supervised Energy-Based Learning for Action Segmentation · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action segmentation
set-supervised action segmentation |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Anchor-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 Set-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Tale of Two Flows: Cooperative Learning of Langevin Flow and Normalizing Flow Toward Energy-Based Model · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constructing Orthogonal Convolutions in an Explicit Manner · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Tale of Two Flows: Cooperative Learning of Langevin Flow and Normalizing Flow Toward Energy-Based Model · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Tale of Two Flows: Cooperative Learning of Langevin Flow and Normalizing Flow Toward Energy-Based Model · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolution design
orthogonal convolution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constructing Orthogonal Convolutions in an Explicit Manner · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Action Shuffle Alternating Learning for Unsupervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action segmentation
unsupervised action segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Action Shuffle Alternating Learning for Unsupervised Action Segmentation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
riemannian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Riemannian Optimization on the Stiefel Manifold via the Cayley Transform · ICLR 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Riemannian Optimization on the Stiefel Manifold via the Cayley Transform · ICLR 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › riemannian optimization
stiefel manifold optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Riemannian Optimization on the Stiefel Manifold via the Cayley Transform · ICLR 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
biomedical image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dense Transformer Networks for Brain Electron Microscopy Image Segmentation · IJCAI 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
electron microscopy image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dense Transformer Networks for Brain Electron Microscopy Image Segmentation · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dense Transformer Networks for Brain Electron Microscopy Image Segmentation · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hidden markov model · 1.8viterbi algorithm · 1.4orthogonal convolution construction · 0.6normalizing flow · 0.6langevin dynamics · 0.6recurrent neural network · 0.5multi-layer perceptron · 0.5monte carlo sampling · 0.5generalized EM · 0.5riemannian gradient descent · 0.4multiple instance learning · 0.4cayley transform · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Generalized Pareto GAN: Generating Extremes of DistributionsabstractExtreme events are ubiquitous in various domains, including finance, meteorology, and network analysis. Nevertheless, modern deep learning techniques exhibit limitations in capturing extreme samples, treating them as outliers. In this paper, we propose Generalized Pareto Generative Adversarial Network (GPGAN), a novel generative model for tackling the generation of extreme values in distributions. Our methodology specifically entails the direct modeling of the multi-dimensional Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) using deep generative neural networks. Compared to prior work, GPGAN excels at faithfully representing the dependence structure exhibited by extreme values. To ensure effective generation, we employ an adaptive Generalized Pareto parameter strategy. This strategy dynamically selects appropriate GPD parameters for each generation step, enabling compatibility with user-defined extremeness functions within the multi-dimensional GPD framework. Extensive evaluations on a benchmark precipitation dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Jun Li 0098, Dingcheng Li, Ping Li 0001, Gennady Samorodnitsky |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2022 | A Tale of Two Flows: Cooperative Learning of Langevin Flow and Normalizing Flow Toward Energy-Based Model
Jianwen Xie, Yaxuan Zhu, Jun Li 0098, Ping Li 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Constructing Orthogonal Convolutions in an Explicit Manner
Jun Li 0098, Yunfeng Cai, Ping Li 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Anchor-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action SegmentationabstractThis paper is about action segmentation under weak supervision in training, where the ground truth provides only a set of actions present, but neither their temporal ordering nor when they occur in a training video. We use a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) grounded on a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to label video frames, and thus generate a pseudo-ground truth for the subsequent pseudo-supervised training. In testing, a Monte Carlo sampling of action sets seen in training is used to generate candidate temporal sequences of actions, and select the maximum posterior sequence. Our key contribution is a new anchor-constrained Viterbi algorithm (ACV) for generating the pseudo-ground truth, where anchors are salient action parts estimated for each action from a given ground-truth set. Our evaluation on the tasks of action segmentation and alignment on the benchmark Breakfast, MPII Cooking2, Hollywood Extended datasets demonstrates our superior performance relative to that of prior work. Jun Li 0098, Sinisa Todorovic |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Action Shuffle Alternating Learning for Unsupervised Action SegmentationabstractThis paper addresses unsupervised action segmentation. Prior work captures the frame-level temporal structure of videos by a feature embedding that encodes time locations of frames in the video. We advance prior work with a new self-supervised learning (SSL) of a feature embedding that accounts for both frame- and action-level structure of videos. Our SSL trains an RNN to recognize positive and negative action sequences, and the RNN’s hidden layer is taken as our new action-level feature embedding. The positive and negative sequences consist of action segments sampled from videos, where in the former the sampled action segments respect their time ordering in the video, and in the latter they are shuffled. As supervision of actions is not available and our SSL requires access to action segments, we specify an HMM that explicitly models action lengths, and infer a MAP action segmentation with the Viterbi algorithm. The resulting action segmentation is used as pseudo-ground truth for estimating our action-level feature embed-ding and updating the HMM. We alternate the above steps within the Generalized EM framework, which ensures convergence. Our evaluation on the Breakfast, YouTube Instructions, and 50Salads datasets gives superior results to those of the state of the art. Jun Li 0098, Sinisa Todorovic |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Set-Constrained Viterbi for Set-Supervised Action SegmentationabstractThis paper is about weakly supervised action segmentation, where the ground truth specifies only a set of actions present in a training video, but not their true temporal ordering. Prior work typically uses a classifier that independently labels video frames for generating the pseudo ground truth, and multiple instance learning for training the classifier. We extend this framework by specifying an HMM, which accounts for co-occurrences of action classes and their temporal lengths, and by explicitly training the HMM on a Viterbi-based loss. Our first contribution is the formulation of a new set-constrained Viterbi algorithm (SCV). Given a video, the SCV generates the MAP action segmentation that satisfies the ground truth. This prediction is used as a framewise pseudo ground truth in our HMM training. Our second contribution in training is a new regularization of feature affinities between training videos that share the same action classes. Evaluation on action segmentation and alignment on the Breakfast, MPII Cooking2, Hollywood Extended datasets demonstrates our significant performance improvement for the two tasks over prior work. Jun Li 0098, Sinisa Todorovic |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Efficient Riemannian Optimization on the Stiefel Manifold via the Cayley Transform
Jun Li 0098, Fuxin Li, Sinisa Todorovic |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Weakly Supervised Energy-Based Learning for Action SegmentationabstractThis paper is about labeling video frames with action classes under weak supervision in training, where we have access to a temporal ordering of actions, but their start and end frames in training videos are unknown. Following prior work, we use an HMM grounded on a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for frame labeling. Our key contribution is a new constrained discriminative forward loss (CDFL) that we use for training the HMM and GRU under weak supervision. While prior work typically estimates the loss on a single, inferred video segmentation, our CDFL discriminates between the energy of all valid and invalid frame labelings of a training video. A valid frame labeling satisfies the ground-truth temporal ordering of actions, whereas an invalid one violates the ground truth. We specify an efficient recursive algorithm for computing the CDFL in terms of the logadd function of the segmentation energy. Our evaluation on action segmentation and alignment gives superior results to those of the state of the art on the benchmark Breakfast Action, Hollywood Extended, and 50Salads datasets. Jun Li 0098, Sinisa Todorovic |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2019 | Dense Transformer Networks for Brain Electron Microscopy Image SegmentationabstractThe key idea of current deep learning methods for dense prediction is to apply a model on a regular patch centered on each pixel to make pixel-wise predictions. These methods are limited in the sense that the patches are determined by network architecture instead of learned from data. In this work, we propose the dense transformer networks, which can learn the shapes and sizes of patches from data. The dense transformer networks employ an encoder-decoder architecture, and a pair of dense transformer modules are inserted into each of the encoder and decoder paths. The novelty of this work is that we provide technical solutions for learning the shapes and sizes of patches from data and efficiently restoring the spatial correspondence required for dense prediction. The proposed dense transformer modules are differentiable, thus the entire network can be trained. We apply the proposed networks on biological image segmentation tasks and show superior performance is achieved in comparison to baseline methods. Jun Li 0098, Yongjun Chen, Ian Davidson, Shuiwang Ji |
IJCAI | 1 |