VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Fifield
dblp:116/4822
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 8 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Wallbleed: A Memory Disclosure Vulnerability in the Great Firewall of China
Shencha Fan, Jackson Sippe, Sakamoto San, Jade Sheffey, David Fifield, Amir Houmansadr, Elson Wedwards, Eric Wustrow |
NDSS | 5 |
| 2024 | Snowflake, a censorship circumvention system using temporary WebRTC proxies
Cecylia Bocovich, Arlo Breault, David Fifield, Serene |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2023 | Network Responses to Russia's Invasion of Ukraine in 2022: A Cautionary Tale for Internet Freedom
Reethika Ramesh, Ram Sundara Raman, Apurva Virkud, Alexandra Dirksen, Armin Huremagic, David Fifield, Dirk Rodenburg, Rod Hynes, Douglas Madory, Roya Ensafi |
USENIX Security Symposium | 6 |
| 2017 | A Usability Evaluation of Tor LauncherabstractAbstract Although Tor has state-of-the art anticensorship measures, users in heavily censored environments will not be able to connect to Tor if they cannot configure their connections. We perform the first usability evaluation of Tor Launcher, the graphical user interface (GUI) that Tor Browser uses to configure connections to Tor. Our study shows that 79% (363 of 458) of user attempts to connect to Tor in simulated censored environments failed. We found that users were often frustrated during the process and tried options at random. In this paper, we measure potential usability issues, discuss design constraints unique to Tor, and provide recommendations based on what we learned to help more users connect to Tor while reducing the time they take to do so. Tor Browser incorporated the changes proposed by this study. Linda Naeun Lee, David Fifield, Nathan Malkin, Ganesh Iyer, Serge Egelman, David A. Wagner 0001 |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 2 |
| 2016 | Do You See What I See? Differential Treatment of Anonymous Users
Sheharbano Khattak, David Fifield, Sadia Afroz 0001, Mobin Javed, Srikanth Sundaresan, Damon McCoy, Vern Paxson, Steven J. Murdoch |
NDSS | 2 |
| 2015 | Examining How the Great Firewall Discovers Hidden Circumvention ServersabstractRecently, the operators of the national censorship infrastructure of China began to employ "active probing" to detect and block the use of privacy tools. This probing works by passively monitoring the network for suspicious traffic, then actively probing the corresponding servers, and blocking any that are determined to run circumvention servers such as Tor. Roya Ensafi, David Fifield, Philipp Winter, Nick Feamster, Nicholas Weaver, Vern Paxson |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |
| 2015 | Blocking-resistant communication through domain frontingabstractAbstract We describe “domain fronting,” a versatile censorship circumvention technique that hides the remote endpoint of a communication. Domain fronting works at the application layer, using HTTPS, to communicate with a forbidden host while appearing to communicate with some other host, permitted by the censor. The key idea is the use of different domain names at different layers of communication. One domain appears on the “outside” of an HTTPS request—in the DNS request and TLS Server Name Indication—while another domain appears on the “inside”—in the HTTP Host header, invisible to the censor under HTTPS encryption. A censor, unable to distinguish fronted and nonfronted traffic to a domain, must choose between allowing circumvention traffic and blocking the domain entirely, which results in expensive collateral damage. Domain fronting is easy to deploy and use and does not require special cooperation by network intermediaries. We identify a number of hard-to-block web services, such as content delivery networks, that support domain-fronted connections and are useful for censorship circumvention. Domain fronting, in various forms, is now a circumvention workhorse. We describe several months of deployment experience in the Tor, Lantern, and Psiphon circumvention systems, whose domain-fronting transports now connect thousands of users daily and transfer many terabytes per month. David Fifield, Chang Lan, Rod Hynes, Percy Wegmann, Vern Paxson |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 1 |
| 2013 | OSS: Using Online Scanning Services for Censorship Circumvention
David Fifield, Gabi Nakibly, Dan Boneh |
Privacy Enhancing Technologies | 1 |
| 2012 | Evading Censorship with Browser-Based Proxies
David Fifield, Nate Hardison, Jonathan D. Ellithorpe, Emily Stark 0001, Dan Boneh, Roger Dingledine, Phillip A. Porras |
Privacy Enhancing Technologies | 1 |