Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liangliang Ye

dblp:116/5195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 55% Recommender systems · 21% Spatial and temporal data management · 18%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › user recommendation
reviewer assignment
0.212013
On Good and Fair Paper-Reviewer Assignment · ICDM 2013
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.212013
On Good and Fair Paper-Reviewer Assignment · ICDM 2013
Data mining › pattern mining › sequential pattern mining
frequent sequence mining
0.112012
Attribute-Based Subsequence Matching and Mining · ICDE 2012
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112012
Attribute-Based Subsequence Matching and Mining · ICDE 2012
Data mining › pattern mining
sequential pattern mining
0.112012
Attribute-Based Subsequence Matching and Mining · ICDE 2012
Spatial and temporal data management › time series data management
subsequence matching
0.112012
Attribute-Based Subsequence Matching and Mining · ICDE 2012
Information retrieval › retrieval evaluation
topic coverage
0.012013
On Good and Fair Paper-Reviewer Assignment · ICDM 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation algorithm · 0.3sequence compression · 0.1sampling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 On Good and Fair Paper-Reviewer Assignment
abstract
Peer review has become the most common practice for judging papers submitted to a conference for decades. An extremely important task involved in peer review is to assign submitted papers to reviewers with appropriate expertise which is referred to as paper-reviewer assignment. In this paper, we study the paper-reviewer assignment problem from both the goodness aspect and the fairness aspect. For the goodness aspect, we propose to maximize the topic coverage of the paper-reviewer assignment. This objective is new and the problem based on this objective is shown to be NP-hard. To solve this problem efficiently, we design an approximate algorithm which gives a 1/3-approximation. For the fairness aspect, we perform a detailed study on conflict-of-interest (COI) types and discuss several issues related to using COI, which, we hope, can raise some open discussions among researchers on the COI study. Finally, we conducted experiments on real datasets which verified the effectiveness of our algorithm and also revealed some interesting results of COI.
Cheng Long 0001, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Liangliang Ye
ICDM4
2012 Attribute-Based Subsequence Matching and Mining
abstract
Sequence analysis is very important in our daily life. Typically, each sequence is associated with an ordered list of elements. For example, in a movie rental application, a customer's movie rental record containing an ordered list of movies is a sequence example. Most studies about sequence analysis focus on subsequence matching which finds all sequences stored in the database such that a given query sequence is a subsequence of each of these sequences. In many applications, elements are associated with properties or attributes. For example, each movie is associated with some attributes like "Director" and "Actors". Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, all existing studies about sequence analysis do not consider the attributes of elements. In this paper, we propose two problems. The first problem is: given a query sequence and a set of sequences, considering the attributes of elements, we want to find all sequences which are matched by this query sequence. This problem is called attribute-based subsequence matching (ASM). All existing applications for the traditional subsequence matching problem can also be applied to our new problem provided that we are given the attributes of elements. We propose an efficient algorithm for problem ASM. The key idea to the efficiency of this algorithm is to compress each whole sequence with potentially many associated attributes into just a triplet of numbers. By dealing with these very compressed representations, we greatly speed up the attribute-based subsequence matching. The second problem is to find all frequent attribute-based subsequence. We also adapt an existing efficient algorithm for this second problem to show we can use the algorithm developed for the first problem. Empirical studies show that our algorithms are scalable in large datasets. In particular, our algorithms run at least an order of magnitude faster than a straightforward method in most cases. This work can stimulate a number of existing data mining problems which are fundamentally based on subsequence matching such as sequence classification, frequent sequence mining, motif detection and sequence matching in bioinformatics.
Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Liangliang Ye, Philip S. Yu
ICDE3