Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jane-Ling Wang
dblp:116/9099
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3731-5391ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
functional data analysis |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis Layers · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › survival analysis
deep survival analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Extended Hazard Models for Survival Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis Layers · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Extended Hazard Models for Survival Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial example detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attribution · AAAI 2020 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Greedy Attack and Gumbel Attack: Generating Adversarial Examples for Discrete Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attribution · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.8self-attention on derivatives · 0.8kernel smoothing · 0.8PACE · 0.8micro neural network · 0.5extended hazard model · 0.5cox proportional hazards · 0.5basis layer · 0.5accelerated failure time · 0.5probabilistic framework · 0.4gumbel-softmax learning-based attack · 0.4greedy perturbation · 0.4feature attribution thresholding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networksabstractAlthough the transformer architecture has come to dominate other models for text and image data, its application to irregularly-spaced longitudinal data has been limited. We introduce a variant of the transformer that enables it to more smoothly impute such functional data. We augment the vanilla transformer with a simple module we call SAND (self-attention on derivatives), which naturally encourages smoothness by modeling the sub-derivative of the imputed curve. On the theoretical front, we prove the number of hidden nodes required by a network with SAND to achieve an $\epsilon$ prediction error bound for functional imputation. Extensive experiments over various types of functional data demonstrate that transformers with SAND produce better imputations than both their standard counterparts as well as transformers augmented with alternative approaches to encode the inductive bias of smoothness. SAND also outperforms standard statistical methods for functional imputation like kernel smoothing and PACE. Ju-Sheng Hong, Junwen Yao, Jonas Mueller 0001, Jane-Ling Wang |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis LayersabstractDespite their widespread success, the application of deep neural networks to functional data remains scarce today. The infinite dimensionality of functional data means standard learning algorithms can be applied only after appropriate dimension reduction, typically achieved via basis expansions. Currently, these bases are chosen a priori without the information for the task at hand and thus may not be effective for the designated task. We instead propose to adaptively learn these bases in an end-to-end fashion. We introduce neural networks that employ a new Basis Layer whose hidden units are each basis functions themselves implemented as a micro neural network. Our architecture learns to apply parsimonious dimension reduction to functional inputs that focuses only on information relevant to the target rather than irrelevant variation in the input function. Across numerous classification/regression tasks with functional data, our method empirically outperforms other types of neural networks, and we prove that our approach is statistically consistent with low generalization error. Junwen Yao, Jonas Mueller 0001, Jane-Ling Wang |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Deep Extended Hazard Models for Survival AnalysisabstractUnlike standard prediction tasks, survival analysis requires modeling right censored data, which must be treated with care. While deep neural networks excel in traditional supervised learning, it remains unclear how to best utilize these models in survival analysis. A key question asks which data-generating assumptions of traditional survival models should be retained and which should be made more flexible via the function-approximating capabilities of neural networks. Rather than estimating the survival function targeted by most existing methods, we introduce a Deep Extended Hazard (DeepEH) model to provide a flexible and general framework for deep survival analysis. The extended hazard model includes the conventional Cox proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models as special cases, so DeepEH subsumes the popular Deep Cox proportional hazard (DeepSurv) and Deep Accelerated Failure Time (DeepAFT) models. We additionally provide theoretical support for the proposed DeepEH model by establishing consistency and convergence rate of the survival function estimator, which underscore the attractive feature that deep learning is able to detect low-dimensional structure of data in high-dimensional space. Numerical experiments also provide evidence that the proposed methods outperform existing statistical and deep learning approaches to survival analysis. Qixian Zhong, Jonas Mueller 0001, Jane-Ling Wang |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature AttributionabstractDeep neural networks obtain state-of-the-art performance on a series of tasks. However, they are easily fooled by adding a small adversarial perturbation to the input. The perturbation is often imperceptible to humans on image data. We observe a significant difference in feature attributions between adversarially crafted examples and original examples. Based on this observation, we introduce a new framework to detect adversarial examples through thresholding a scale estimate of feature attribution scores. Furthermore, we extend our method to include multi-layer feature attributions in order to tackle attacks that have mixed confidence levels. As demonstrated in extensive experiments, our method achieves superior performances in distinguishing adversarial examples from popular attack methods on a variety of real data sets compared to state-of-the-art detection methods. In particular, our method is able to detect adversarial examples of mixed confidence levels, and transfer between different attacking methods. We also show that our method achieves competitive performance even when the attacker has complete access to the detector. Puyudi Yang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Jane-Ling Wang, Michael I. Jordan |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2020 | Greedy Attack and Gumbel Attack: Generating Adversarial Examples for Discrete DataabstractWe present a probabilistic framework for studying adversarial attacks on discrete data. Based on this framework, we derive a perturbation-based method, Greedy Attack, and a scalable learning-based method, Gumbel Attack, that illustrate various tradeoffs in the design of attacks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods using both quantitative metrics and human evaluation on various state-of-the-art models for text classification, including a word-based CNN, a character-based CNN and an LSTM. As an example of our results, we show that the accuracy of character-based convolutional networks drops to the level of random selection by modifying only five characters through Greedy Attack. Puyudi Yang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Jane-Ling Wang, Michael I. Jordan |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2020 | Emotional EEG classification using connectivity features and convolutional neural networks
Seong-Eun Moon, Chun-Jui Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Jane-Ling Wang, Jong-Seok Lee |
Neural Networks | 4 |