Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karen L. Mungall

dblp:116/9510 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic variant analysis
0.412019
MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variants · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection
0.412019
MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variants · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.112012
BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
transcriptome sequencing
0.112012
BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reference alignment · 0.1read-pair analysis · 0.1de novo assembly · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Enhancing clinical genomic accuracy with panelGC: a novel metric and tool for quantifying and monitoring GC biases in hybridization capture panel sequencing
abstract
Accurate assessment of fragment abundance within a genome is crucial in clinical genomics applications such as the analysis of copy number variation (CNV). However, this task is often hindered by biased coverage in regions with varying guanine-cytosine (GC) content. These biases are particularly exacerbated in hybridization capture sequencing due to GC effects on probe hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification efficiency. Such GC content-associated variations can exert a negative impact on the fidelity of CNV calling within hybridization capture panels. In this report, we present panelGC, a novel metric, to quantify and monitor GC biases in hybridization capture sequencing data. We establish the efficacy of panelGC, demonstrating its proficiency in identifying and flagging potential procedural anomalies, even in situations where instrument and experimental monitoring data may not be readily accessible. Validation using real-world datasets demonstrates that panelGC enhances the quality control and reliability of hybridization capture panel sequencing.
Xuanjin Cheng, Murathan T. Goktas, Laura M. Williamson, Martin Krzywinski, David T. Mulder, Lucas Swanson, Jill Slind, Jelena Sihvonen, Cynthia R. Chow, Amy Carr, Ian Bosdet, Tracy Tucker, Sean Young, Richard A. Moore, Karen L. Mungall, Stephen Yip, Steven J. M. Jones
Briefings Bioinform.15
2019 MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variants
abstract
Summary: Reliably identifying genomic rearrangements and interpreting their impact is a key step in understanding their role in human cancers and inherited genetic diseases. Many short read algorithmic approaches exist but all have appreciable false negative rates. A common approach is to evaluate the union of multiple tools increasing sensitivity, followed by filtering to retain specificity. Here we describe an application framework for the rapid generation of structural variant consensus, unique in its ability to visualize the genetic impact and context as well as process both genome and transcriptome data. Availability and implementation: http://mavis.bcgsc.ca. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Caralyn Reisle, Karen L. Mungall, Caleb Choo, Daniel Paulino, Dustin W. Bleile, Amir Muhammadzadeh, Andrew J. Mungall, Richard A. Moore, Inna Shlafman, Robin Coope, Stephen Pleasance, Yussanne Ma, Steven J. M. Jones
Bioinform.2
2012 BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data
abstract
Abstract Summary: Despite recent progress, computational tools that identify gene fusions from next-generation whole transcriptome sequencing data are often limited in accuracy and scalability. Here, we present a software package, BreakFusion that combines the strength of reference alignment followed by read-pair analysis and de novo assembly to achieve a good balance in sensitivity, specificity and computational efficiency. Availability: http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/BreakFusion Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online
Ken Chen 0001, John W. Wallis, Cyriac Kandoth, Joelle M. Kalicki-Veizer, Karen L. Mungall, Andrew J. Mungall, Steven J. M. Jones, Marco A. Marra, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, John N. Weinstein
Bioinform.5