Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karen L. Mungall
dblp:116/9510
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic variant analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variants · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variants · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
transcriptome sequencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reference alignment · 0.1read-pair analysis · 0.1de novo assembly · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Enhancing clinical genomic accuracy with panelGC: a novel metric and tool for quantifying and monitoring GC biases in hybridization capture panel sequencingabstractAccurate assessment of fragment abundance within a genome is crucial in clinical genomics applications such as the analysis of copy number variation (CNV). However, this task is often hindered by biased coverage in regions with varying guanine-cytosine (GC) content. These biases are particularly exacerbated in hybridization capture sequencing due to GC effects on probe hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification efficiency. Such GC content-associated variations can exert a negative impact on the fidelity of CNV calling within hybridization capture panels. In this report, we present panelGC, a novel metric, to quantify and monitor GC biases in hybridization capture sequencing data. We establish the efficacy of panelGC, demonstrating its proficiency in identifying and flagging potential procedural anomalies, even in situations where instrument and experimental monitoring data may not be readily accessible. Validation using real-world datasets demonstrates that panelGC enhances the quality control and reliability of hybridization capture panel sequencing. Xuanjin Cheng, Murathan T. Goktas, Laura M. Williamson, Martin Krzywinski, David T. Mulder, Lucas Swanson, Jill Slind, Jelena Sihvonen, Cynthia R. Chow, Amy Carr, Ian Bosdet, Tracy Tucker, Sean Young, Richard A. Moore, Karen L. Mungall, Stephen Yip, Steven J. M. Jones |
Briefings Bioinform. | 15 |
| 2019 | MAVIS: merging, annotation, validation, and illustration of structural variantsabstractSummary: Reliably identifying genomic rearrangements and interpreting their impact is a key step in understanding their role in human cancers and inherited genetic diseases. Many short read algorithmic approaches exist but all have appreciable false negative rates. A common approach is to evaluate the union of multiple tools increasing sensitivity, followed by filtering to retain specificity. Here we describe an application framework for the rapid generation of structural variant consensus, unique in its ability to visualize the genetic impact and context as well as process both genome and transcriptome data. Availability and implementation: http://mavis.bcgsc.ca. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Caralyn Reisle, Karen L. Mungall, Caleb Choo, Daniel Paulino, Dustin W. Bleile, Amir Muhammadzadeh, Andrew J. Mungall, Richard A. Moore, Inna Shlafman, Robin Coope, Stephen Pleasance, Yussanne Ma, Steven J. M. Jones |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2012 | BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing dataabstractAbstract Summary: Despite recent progress, computational tools that identify gene fusions from next-generation whole transcriptome sequencing data are often limited in accuracy and scalability. Here, we present a software package, BreakFusion that combines the strength of reference alignment followed by read-pair analysis and de novo assembly to achieve a good balance in sensitivity, specificity and computational efficiency. Availability: http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/BreakFusion Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online Ken Chen 0001, John W. Wallis, Cyriac Kandoth, Joelle M. Kalicki-Veizer, Karen L. Mungall, Andrew J. Mungall, Steven J. M. Jones, Marco A. Marra, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, John N. Weinstein |
Bioinform. | 5 |