Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yu-Shen Chen

dblp:117/2710 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 77% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives › physical unclonable function
modeling attack resistance
0.412019
Adversarial Attack against Modeling Attack on PUFs · DAC 2019
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives
physical unclonable function
0.412019
Adversarial Attack against Modeling Attack on PUFs · DAC 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
key generation
0.112019
Adversarial Attack against Modeling Attack on PUFs · DAC 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › key generation
PUF-based key generation
0.112019
Adversarial Attack against Modeling Attack on PUFs · DAC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.4GPU acceleration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Adversarial Attack against Modeling Attack on PUFs
abstract
The Physical Unclonable Function (PUF) has been proposed for the identification and authentication of devices and cryptographic key generation. A strong PUF provides an extremely large number of device-specific challenge-response pairs (CRP) which can be used for identification. Unfortunately, the CRP mechanism is vulnerable to modeling attack, which uses machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict PUF responses with high accuracy. Many methods have been developed to strengthen strong PUFs with complicated hardware; however, recent studies show that they are still vulnerable by leveraging GPU-accelerated ML algorithms.
Sying-Jyan Wang, Yu-Shen Chen, Katherine Shu-Min Li
DAC2