Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Spencer Pearson

dblp:117/6021 · also Spencer S. Pearson · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Debugging and program repair · 82% Empirical software engineering · 14% Software testing · 4%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 76% Database system architecture and tuning · 24%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.522017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017
Evaluation of fault localization techniques · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
fault localization evaluation
0.522017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017
Evaluation of fault localization techniques · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
mutation-based fault localization
0.312017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017
Empirical software engineering › reproducibility
replication study
0.312017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
spectrum-based fault localization
0.312017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017
Query processing and optimization
similarity query processing
0.212013
Similarity queries: their conceptual evaluation, transformations, and processing · VLDB J. 2013
Query processing and optimization › similarity join
metric similarity join
0.112012
Exploiting Database Similarity Joins for Metric Spaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
Query processing and optimization
similarity join
0.112012
Exploiting Database Similarity Joins for Metric Spaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
Software testing
mutation testing
0.112017
Evaluating and improving fault localization · ICSE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

replication study · 0.3effect size analysis · 0.3empirical evaluation · 0.2non-blocking operator · 0.1distance function · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Evaluating and improving fault localization
abstract
Most fault localization techniques take as input a faulty program, and produce as output a ranked list of suspicious code locations at which the program may be defective. When researchers propose a new fault localization technique, they typically evaluate it on programs with known faults. The technique is scored based on where in its output list the defective code appears. This enables the comparison of multiple fault localization techniques to determine which one is better. Previous research has evaluated fault localization techniques using artificial faults, generated either by mutation tools or manually. In other words, previous research has determined which fault localization techniques are best at finding artificial faults. However, it is not known which fault localization techniques are best at finding real faults. It is not obvious that the answer is the same, given previous work showing that artificial faults have both similarities to and differences from real faults. We performed a replication study to evaluate 10 claims in the literature that compared fault localization techniques (from the spectrum-based and mutation-based families). We used 2995 artificial faults in 6 real-world programs. Our results support 7 of the previous claims as statistically significant, but only 3 as having non-negligible effect sizes. Then, we evaluated the same 10 claims, using 310 real faults from the 6 programs. Every previous result was refuted or was statistically and practically insignificant. Our experiments show that artificial faults are not useful for predicting which fault localization techniques perform best on real faults. In light of these results, we identified a design space that includes many previously-studied fault localization techniques as well as hundreds of new techniques. We experimentally determined which factors in the design space are most important, using an overall set of 395 real faults. Then, we extended this design space with new techniques. Several of our novel techniques outperform all existing techniques, notably in terms of ranking defective code in the top-5 or top-10 reports.
Spencer Pearson, José Campos 0001, René Just, Gordon Fraser 0001, Rui Abreu 0001, Michael D. Ernst, Deric Pang, Benjamin Keller
ICSE1
2016 Evaluation of fault localization techniques
abstract
Fault localization (FL) takes as input a faulty program and produces as output a list of code locations ranked by probability of being defective. A programmer doing debugging, or a program repair tool, could save time by focusing on the most suspicious locations.
Spencer Pearson
SIGSOFT FSE1
2015 Similarity Joins: Their implementation and interactions with other database operators
Yasin N. Silva, Spencer Pearson, Jaime Chon, Ryan Roberts
Inf. Syst.2
2015 Towards a hybrid relational and XML benchmark for loosely-coupled distributed data sources
abstract
There are known benchmarks for the performance evaluation of relational and XML databases. However, there is an increasing demand for database applications that require access to heterogeneous loosely-coupled distributed data sources . This paper presents a hybrid benchmark based on TPC-H where the data sources are heterogeneous. Specifically, the paper describes the design of the relational and XML data sources as well as the query redesign in the LINQ query language , which supports queries over heterogeneous data sources. The results of a performance evaluation of the hybrid benchmark over various database products is included for untyped and typed XML with and without clearing the database cache .
Mahesh B. Chaudhari, Suzanne W. Dietrich, Jennifer Ortiz, Spencer Pearson
J. Syst. Softw.4
2014 Index-Based R-S Similarity Joins
Spencer Pearson, Yasin N. Silva
SISAP1
2013 Database Similarity Join for Metric Spaces
Yasin N. Silva, Spencer Pearson, Jason A. Cheney
SISAP2
2013 Similarity queries: their conceptual evaluation, transformations, and processing
Yasin N. Silva, Walid G. Aref, Per-Åke Larson, Spencer Pearson, Mohamed H. Ali
VLDB J.4
2012 Exploiting Database Similarity Joins for Metric Spaces
abstract
Similarity Joins are recognized among the most useful data processing and analysis operations and are extensively used in multiple application domains. They retrieve all data pairs whose distances are smaller than a predefined threshold ε. Multiple Similarity Join algorithms and implementation techniques have been proposed. They range from out-of-database approaches for only in-memory and external memory data to techniques that make use of standard database operators to answer similarity joins. Recent work has shown that this operation can be efficiently implemented as a physical database operator. However, the proposed operator only support 1D numeric data. This paper presents DBSimJoin , a physical Similarity Join database operator for datasets that lie in any metric space. DBSimJoin is a non-blocking operator that prioritizes the early generation of results. We implemented the proposed operator in PostgreSQL, an open source database system. We show how this operator can be used in multiple real-world data analysis scenarios with multiple data types and distance functions. Particularly, we show the use of DBSimJoin to identify similar images represented as feature vectors, and similar publications in a bibliographic database. We also show that DBSimJoin scales very well when important parameters, e.g., e, data size, increase.
Yasin N. Silva, Spencer Pearson
Proc. VLDB Endow.2