Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Serge Mankowskii

dblp:117/6026 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 62% Performance modeling and evaluation · 19% Distributed systems · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
key-value storage
0.112012
Solving Big Data Challenges for Enterprise Application Performance Management · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
Distributed systems › performance management
application performance monitoring
0.012012
Solving Big Data Challenges for Enterprise Application Performance Management · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.012012
Solving Big Data Challenges for Enterprise Application Performance Management · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Solving Big Data Challenges for Enterprise Application Performance Management
abstract
As the complexity of enterprise systems increases, the need for monitoring and analyzing such systems also grows. A number of companies have built sophisticated monitoring tools that go far beyond simple resource utilization reports. For example, based on instrumentation and specialized APIs, it is now possible to monitor single method invocations and trace individual transactions across geographically distributed systems. This high-level of detail enables more precise forms of analysis and prediction but comes at the price of high data rates (i.e., big data). To maximize the benefit of data monitoring, the data has to be stored for an extended period of time for ulterior analysis. This new wave of big data analytics imposes new challenges especially for the application performance monitoring systems. The monitoring data has to be stored in a system that can sustain the high data rates and at the same time enable an up-to-date view of the underlying infrastructure. With the advent of modern key-value stores, a variety of data storage systems have emerged that are built with a focus on scalability and high data rates as predominant in this monitoring use case. In this work, we present our experience and a comprehensive performance evaluation of six modern (open-source) data stores in the context of application performance monitoring as part of CA Technologies initiative. We evaluated these systems with data and workloads that can be found in application performance monitoring, as well as, on-line advertisement, power monitoring, and many other use cases. We present our insights not only as performance results but also as lessons learned and our experience relating to the setup and configuration complexity of these data stores in an industry setting.
Tilmann Rabl, Mohammad Sadoghi, Hans-Arno Jacobsen, Sergio Gómez-Villamor, Victor Muntés-Mulero, Serge Mankowskii
Proc. VLDB Endow.6