Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. Pooja
dblp:118/3876
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › registration
3d registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | On Averaging Multiview Relations for 3D Scan Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014 |
Geometric modeling and processing › registration › 3d registration
multi-view registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | On Averaging Multiview Relations for 3D Scan Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point set registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | On Averaging Multiview Relations for 3D Scan Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
motion averaging · 0.2lie group averaging · 0.2iterative closest point · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | On Averaging Multiview Relations for 3D Scan RegistrationabstractIn this paper, we present an extension of the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm that simultaneously registers multiple 3D scans. While ICP fails to utilize the multiview constraints available, our method exploits the information redundancy in a set of 3D scans by using the averaging of relative motions. This averaging method utilizes the Lie group structure of motions, resulting in a 3D registration method that is both efficient and accurate. In addition, we present two variants of our approach, i.e., a method that solves for multiview 3D registration while obeying causality and a transitive correspondence variant that efficiently solves the correspondence problem across multiple scans. We present experimental results to characterize our method and explain its behavior as well as those of some other multiview registration methods in the literature. We establish the superior accuracy of our method in comparison to these multiview methods with registration results on a set of well-known real datasets of 3D scans. Venu Madhav Govindu, A. Pooja |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 2 |