Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arun Tejasvi Chaganty

dblp:118/3930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
8as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7122-1298ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Language models and text generation · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 61% Recommender systems · 39%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 57% Automated reasoning and model checking · 43%

Topics — the 28 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.922023
RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models · ACL (1) 2023
How Much is 131 Million Dollars? Putting Numbers in Perspective with Compositional Descriptions · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability › factuality
factual consistency
0.712023
RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models · ACL (1) 2023
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation
0.712023
Beyond Single Items: Exploring User Preferences in Item Sets with the Conversational Playlist Curation Dataset · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
evidence retrieval
0.712023
RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering
0.612022
Dialog Inpainting: Turning Documents into Dialogs · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
method of moments
0.432015
Estimating Latent-Variable Graphical Models using Moments and Likelihoods · ICML 2014
Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressions · ICML (3) 2013
Estimating Mixture Models via Mixtures of Polynomials · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition
0.422014
Estimating Latent-Variable Graphical Models using Moments and Likelihoods · ICML 2014
Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressions · ICML (3) 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
frame semantics
0.312018
Textual Analogy Parsing: What's Shared and What's Compared among Analogous Facts · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text evaluation
human evaluation
0.312018
The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evalaution · ACL (1) 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation
0.312018
Textual Analogy Parsing: What's Shared and What's Compared among Analogous Facts · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation
0.312018
The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evalaution · ACL (1) 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction
0.312017
Importance sampling for unbiased on-demand evaluation of knowledge base population · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › knowledge discovery from text
knowledge base population
0.312017
Importance sampling for unbiased on-demand evaluation of knowledge base population · EMNLP 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian decision theory
0.212015
On-the-Job Learning with Bayesian Decision Theory · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
markov games
0.212015
On-the-Job Learning with Bayesian Decision Theory · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.212015
Estimating Mixture Models via Mixtures of Polynomials · NIPS 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.212015
On-the-Job Learning with Bayesian Decision Theory · NIPS 2015
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.212015
Estimating Mixture Models via Mixtures of Polynomials · NIPS 2015
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212023
Beyond Single Items: Exploring User Preferences in Item Sets with the Conversational Playlist Curation Dataset · SIGIR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
latent variable graphical model
0.212014
Estimating Latent-Variable Graphical Models using Moments and Likelihoods · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation
0.212014
Estimating Latent-Variable Graphical Models using Moments and Likelihoods · ICML 2014
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › conversational information seeking
conversational search
0.212022
Dialog Inpainting: Turning Documents into Dialogs · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212013
Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressions · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
mixture of linear regressions
0.212013
Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressions · ICML (3) 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational learning
0.212013
Combining Relational Learning with SMT Solvers Using CEGAR · CAV 2013
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability modulo theories
0.212013
Combining Relational Learning with SMT Solvers Using CEGAR · CAV 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
knowledge base reasoning
0.112016
How Much is 131 Million Dollars? Putting Numbers in Perspective with Compositional Descriptions · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.112015
On-the-Job Learning with Bayesian Decision Theory · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.3language model revision · 1.3synthetic data generation · 1.1dialog inpainting · 1.1data collection methodology · 0.7conversational retrieval models · 0.7crowdsourcing · 0.5unbiased estimation · 0.3integer linear programming · 0.3control variates · 0.3importance sampling · 0.3formula construction · 0.2semidefinite relaxation · 0.2method of moments · 0.2computer algebra · 0.2SMT solving · 0.2CEGAR · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models
abstract
Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Anthony Chen, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Yicheng Fan, Vincent Zhao, Ni Lao, Hongrae Lee, Da-Cheng Juan, Kelvin Guu. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Anthony Chen, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Yicheng Fan, Vincent Y. Zhao, Ni Lao, Hongrae Lee, Da-Cheng Juan, Kelvin Guu
ACL (1)5
2023 Beyond Single Items: Exploring User Preferences in Item Sets with the Conversational Playlist Curation Dataset
abstract
Users in consumption domains, like music, are often able to more efficiently provide preferences over a set of items (e.g. a playlist or radio) than over single items (e.g. songs). Unfortunately, this is an underexplored area of research, with most existing recommendation systems limited to understanding preferences over single items. Curating an item set exponentiates the search space that recommender systems must consider (all subsets of items!): this motivates conversational approaches-where users explicitly state or refine their preferences and systems elicit preferences in natural language-as an efficient way to understand user needs. We call this task conversational item set curation and present a novel data collection methodology that efficiently collects realistic preferences about item sets in a conversational setting by observing both item-level and set-level feedback. We apply this methodology to music recommendation to build the Conversational Playlist Curation Dataset (CPCD), where we show that it leads raters to express preferences that would not be otherwise expressed. Finally, we propose a wide range of conversational retrieval models as baselines for this task and evaluate them on the dataset.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Megan Leszczynski, Ravi Ganti, Krisztian Balog, Filip Radlinski
SIGIR1
2022 Dialog Inpainting: Turning Documents into Dialogs
abstract
Many important questions (e.g. "How to eat healthier?") require conversation to establish context and explore in depth. However, conversational question answering (ConvQA) systems have long been stymied by scarce training data that is expensive to collect. To address this problem, we propose a new technique for synthetically generating diverse and high-quality dialog data: dialog inpainting. Our approach takes the text of any document and transforms it into a two-person dialog between the writer and an imagined reader: we treat sentences from the article as utterances spoken by the writer, and then use a dialog inpainter to predict what the imagined reader asked or said in between each of the writer’s utterances. By applying this approach to passages from Wikipedia and the web, we produce WikiDialog and WebDialog, two datasets totalling 19 million diverse information-seeking dialogs – 1,000x larger than the largest existing ConvQA dataset. Furthermore, human raters judge the answer adequacy and conversationality of WikiDialog to be as good or better than existing manually-collected datasets. Remarkably, our approach shows strong zero-shot capability, generating high quality synthetic data without using any in-domain ConvQA data. Using our inpainted data to pre-train ConvQA retrieval systems, we significantly advance state-of-the-art across three benchmarks (QReCC, OR-QuAC, TREC CAsT) yielding up to 40% relative gains on standard evaluation metrics.
Zhuyun Dai, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Vincent Y. Zhao, Aida Amini, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Green, Kelvin Guu
ICML2
2019 Mimic and Rephrase: Reflective Listening in Open-Ended Dialogue
abstract
Reflective listening–demonstrating that you have heard your conversational partner–is key to effective communication. Expert human communicators often mimic and rephrase their conversational partner, e.g., when responding to sentimental stories or to questions they don't know the answer to. We introduce a new task and an associated dataset wherein dialogue agents similarly mimic and rephrase a user's request to communicate sympathy (I'm sorry to hear that) or lack of knowledge (I do not know that). We study what makes a rephrasal response good against a set of qualitative metrics. We then evaluate three models for generating responses: a syntax-aware rule-based system, a seq2seq LSTM neural models with attention (S2SA), and the same neural model augmented with a copy mechanism (S2SA+C). In a human evaluation, we find that S2SA+C and the rule-based system are comparable and approach human-generated response quality. In addition, experiences with a live deployment of S2SA+C in a customer support setting suggest that this generation task is a practical contribution to real world conversational agents.
Justin Dieter, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Gabor Angeli, Angel X. Chang
CoNLL3
2018 The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evalaution
abstract
For evaluating generation systems, automatic metrics such as BLEU cost nothing to run but have been shown to correlate poorly with human judgment, leading to systematic bias against certain model improvements.On the other hand, averaging human judgments, the unbiased gold standard, is often too expensive.In this paper, we use control variates to combine automatic metrics with human evaluation to obtain an unbiased estimator with lower cost than human evaluation alone.In practice, however, we obtain only a 7-13% cost reduction on evaluating summarization and open-response question answering systems.We then prove that our estimator is optimal: there is no unbiased estimator with lower cost.Our theory further highlights the two fundamental bottlenecks-the automatic metric and the prompt shown to human evaluatorsboth of which need to be improved to obtain greater cost savings.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Stephen Mussmann, Percy Liang
ACL (1)1
2018 Textual Analogy Parsing: What's Shared and What's Compared among Analogous Facts
abstract
To understand a sentence like "whereas only 10% of White Americans live at or below the poverty line, 28% of African Americans do" it is important not only to identify individual facts, e.g., poverty rates of distinct demographic groups, but also the higher-order relations between them, e.g., the disparity between them.In this paper, we propose the task of Textual Analogy Parsing (TAP) to model this higher-order meaning.The output of TAP is a frame-style meaning representation which explicitly specifies what is shared (e.g., poverty rates) and what is compared (e.g., White Americans vs. African Americans, 10% vs. 28%) between its component facts.Such a meaning representation can enable new applications that rely on discourse understanding such as automated chart generation from quantitative text.We present a new dataset for TAP, baselines, and a model that successfully uses an ILP to enforce the structural constraints of the problem.
Matthew Lamm, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Christopher D. Manning, Daniel Jurafsky, Percy Liang
EMNLP2
2017 Importance sampling for unbiased on-demand evaluation of knowledge base population
abstract
Knowledge base population (KBP) systems take in a large document corpus and extract entities and their relations.Thus far, KBP evaluation has relied on judgements on the pooled predictions of existing systems.We show that this evaluation is problematic: when a new system predicts a previously unseen relation, it is penalized even if it is correct.This leads to significant bias against new systems, which counterproductively discourages innovation in the field.Our first contribution is a new importance-sampling based evaluation which corrects for this bias by annotating a new system's predictions ondemand via crowdsourcing.We show this eliminates bias and reduces variance using data from the 2015 TAC KBP task.Our second contribution is an implementation of our method made publicly available as an online KBP evaluation service.We pilot the service by testing diverse state-ofthe-art systems on the TAC KBP 2016 corpus and obtain accurate scores in a cost effective manner.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Ashwin Paranjape, Percy Liang, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP1
2016 How Much is 131 Million Dollars? Putting Numbers in Perspective with Compositional Descriptions
abstract
How much is 131 million US dollars?To help readers put such numbers in context, we propose a new task of automatically generating short descriptions known as perspectives, e.g."$131 million is about the cost to employ everyone in Texas over a lunch period".First, we collect a dataset of numeric mentions in news articles, where each mention is labeled with a set of rated perspectives.We then propose a system to generate these descriptions consisting of two steps: formula construction and description generation.In construction, we compose formulae from numeric facts in a knowledge base and rank the resulting formulas based on familiarity, numeric proximity and semantic compatibility.In generation, we convert a formula into natural language using a sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural network.Our system obtains a 15.2% F 1 improvement over a non-compositional baseline at formula construction and a 12.5 BLEU point improvement over a baseline description generation.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang
ACL (1)1
2015 Tensor Factorization via Matrix Factorization
abstract
Tensor factorization arises in many machine learning applications, such as knowledge base modeling and parameter estimation in latent variable models. However, numerical methods for tensor factorization have not reached the level of maturity of matrix factorization methods. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for CP tensor factorization that uses random projections to reduce the problem to simultaneous matrix diagonalization. Our method is conceptually simple and also applies to non-orthogonal and asymmetric tensors of arbitrary order. We prove that a small number random projections essentially preserves the spectral information in the tensor, allowing us to remove the dependence on the eigengap that plagued earlier tensor-to-matrix reductions. Experimentally, our method outperforms existing tensor factorization methods on both simulated data and two real datasets.
Volodymyr Kuleshov, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang
AISTATS2
2015 Estimating Mixture Models via Mixtures of Polynomials
abstract
Mixture modeling is a general technique for making any simple model more expressive through weighted combination. This generality and simplicity in part explains the success of the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm, in which updates are easy to derive for a wide class of mixture models. However, the likelihood of a mixture model is non-convex, so EM has no known global convergence guarantees. Recently, method of moments approaches offer global guarantees for some mixture models, but they do not extend easily to the range of mixture models that exist. In this work, we present Polymom, an unifying framework based on method of moments in which estimation procedures are easily derivable, just as in EM. Polymom is applicable when the moments of a single mixture component are polynomials of the parameters. Our key observation is that the moments of the mixture model are a mixture of these polynomials, which allows us to cast estimation as a Generalized Moment Problem. We solve its relaxations using semidefinite optimization, and then extract parameters using ideas from computer algebra. This framework allows us to draw insights and apply tools from convex optimization, computer algebra and the theory of moments to study problems in statistical estimation. Simulations show good empirical performance on several models.
Sida I. Wang, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang
NIPS2
2015 On-the-Job Learning with Bayesian Decision Theory
abstract
Our goal is to deploy a high-accuracy system starting with zero training examples. We consider an “on-the-job” setting, where as inputs arrive, we use real-time crowdsourcing to resolve uncertainty where needed and output our prediction when confident. As the model improves over time, the reliance on crowdsourcing queries decreases. We cast our setting as a stochastic game based on Bayesian decision theory, which allows us to balance latency, cost, and accuracy objectives in a principled way. Computing the optimal policy is intractable, so we develop an approximation based on Monte Carlo Tree Search. We tested our approach on three datasets-- named-entity recognition, sentiment classification, and image classification. On the NER task we obtained more than an order of magnitude reduction in cost compared to full human annotation, while boosting performance relative to the expert provided labels. We also achieve a 8% F1 improvement over having a single human label the whole set, and a 28% F1 improvement over online learning.
Keenon Werling, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang, Christopher D. Manning
NIPS2
2014 Estimating Latent-Variable Graphical Models using Moments and Likelihoods
abstract
Recent work in method of moments provide consistent estimates for latent-variable models, avoiding local optima issues, but these methods can only be applied to certain types of graphical models. In this work, we show that the method of moments in conjunction with a composite marginal likelihood objective yields consistent parameter estimates for a much broader class of directed and undirected graphical models, including loopy graphs with high treewidth. Specifically, we use tensor factorization to reveal partial information about the hidden variables, rendering the otherwise non-convex negative log-likelihood convex. Our approach gracefully extends to models outside our class by incorporating the partial information via posterior regulraization.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang
ICML1
2013 Efficiently Sampling Probabilistic Programs via Program Analysis
abstract
Probabilistic programs are intuitive and succinct representations of complex probability distributions. A natural approach to performing inference over these programs is to execute them and compute statistics over the resulting samples. Indeed, this approach has been taken before in a number of probabilistic programming tools. In this paper, we address two key challenges of this paradigm: (i) ensuring samples are well distributed in the combinatorial space of the program, and (ii) efficiently generating samples with minimal rejection. We present a new sampling algorithm Qi that addresses these challenges using concepts from the field of program analysis. To solve the first challenge (getting diverse samples), we use a technique called symbolic execution to systematically explore all the paths in a program. In the case of programs with loops, we systematically explore all paths up to a given depth, and present theorems on error bounds on the estimates as a function of the path bounds used. To solve the second challenge (efficient samples with minimal rejection), we propagate observations backward through the program using the notion of Dijkstra’s weakest preconditions and hoist these propagated conditions to condition elementary distributions during sampling. We present theorems explaining the mathematical properties of Qi, as well as empirical results from an implementation of the algorithm.
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Aditya V. Nori, Sriram K. Rajamani
AISTATS1
2013 Combining Relational Learning with SMT Solvers Using CEGAR
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Akash Lal, Aditya V. Nori, Sriram K. Rajamani
CAV1
2013 Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressions
abstract
Discriminative latent-variable models are typically learned using EM or gradient-based optimization, which suffer from local optima. In this paper, we develop a new computationally efficient and provably consistent estimator for the mixture of linear regressions, a simple instance of discriminative latent-variable models. Our approach relies on a low-rank linear regression to recover a symmetric tensor, which can be factorized into the parameters using the tensor power method. We prove rates of convergence for our estimator and provide an empirical evaluation illustrating its strengths relative to local optimization (EM).
Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Percy Liang
ICML (3)1