Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark Saroufim
dblp:118/5750
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 50% Compilers and program optimization · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 83% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
neural network training acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competition · ICLR 2025 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › dynamic compilation
just-in-time compilation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph Compilation · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
preconditioning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competition · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
deep learning framework |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph Compilation · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
just-in-time compilation · 1.5graph compilation · 1.5schedule-free adamw · 0.9hyperparameter tuning · 0.9distributed shampoo · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competitionabstractThe goal of the AlgoPerf: Training Algorithms competition is to evaluate practical speed-ups in neural network training achieved solely by improving the underlying training algorithms. In the external tuning ruleset, submissions must provide workload-agnostic hyperparameter search spaces, while in the self-tuning ruleset they must be completely hyperparameter-free. In both rulesets, submissions are compared on time-to-result across multiple deep learning workloads, training on fixed hardware. This paper presents the inaugural AlgoPerf competition's results, which drew 18 diverse submissions from 10 teams. Our investigation reveals several key findings: (1) The winning submission in the external tuning ruleset, using Distributed Shampoo, demonstrates the effectiveness of non-diagonal preconditioning over popular methods like Adam, even when compared on wall-clock runtime. (2) The winning submission in the self-tuning ruleset, based on the Schedule Free AdamW algorithm, demonstrates a new level of effectiveness for completely hyperparameter-free training algorithms. (3) The top-scoring submissions were surprisingly robust to workload changes. We also discuss the engineering challenges encountered in ensuring a fair comparison between different training algorithms. These results highlight both the significant progress so far, and the considerable room for further improvements. Priya Kasimbeg, Frank Schneider 0001, Runa Eschenhagen, Juhan Bae, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Mark Saroufim, Boyuan Feng, Less Wright, Edward Z. Yang, Zachary Nado, Sourabh Medapati, Philipp Hennig, Michael G. Rabbat, George E. Dahl |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph CompilationabstractThis paper introduces two extensions to the popular PyTorch machine learning framework, TorchDynamo and TorchInductor, which implement the torch.compile feature released in PyTorch 2. TorchDynamo is a Python-level just-in-time (JIT) compiler that enables graph compilation in PyTorch programs without sacrificing the flexibility of Python. It achieves this by dynamically modifying Python bytecode before execution and extracting sequences of PyTorch operations into an FX graph, which is then JIT compiled using one of many extensible backends. TorchInductor is the default compiler backend for TorchDynamo, which translates PyTorch programs into OpenAI's Triton for GPUs and C++ for CPUs. Results show that TorchDynamo is able to capture graphs more robustly than prior approaches while adding minimal overhead, and TorchInductor is able to provide a 2.27× inference and 1.41× training geometric mean speedup on an NVIDIA A100 GPU across 180+ real-world models, which outperforms six other compilers. These extensions provide a new way to apply optimizations through compilers in eager mode frameworks like PyTorch. Jason Ansel, Edward Z. Yang, Horace He, Natalia Gimelshein, Animesh Jain, Michael Voznesensky, Bin Bao, Peter Bell 0008, David Berard, Evgeni Burovski, Geeta Chauhan, Anjali Chourdia, Will Constable, Alban Desmaison, Zach DeVito, Elias Ellison, Will Feng, Jiong Gong, Michael Gschwind, Brian Hirsh, Sherlock Huang, Kshiteej Kalambarkar, Laurent Kirsch, Michael Lazos, Mario Lezcano Casado, Yanbo Liang, Jason Liang, Yinghai Lu, C. K. Luk, Bert Maher, Yunjie Pan, Christian Puhrsch, Matthias Reso, Mark Saroufim, Marcos Yukio Siraichi, Helen Suk, Shunting Zhang, Michael Suo, Phil Tillet, Xu Zhao 0004, Eikan Wang, Keren Zhou 0001, Richard Zou, Ajit Mathews, Xiaoquan Wen, Gregory Chanan, Peng Wu 0001, Soumith Chintala |
ASPLOS (2) | 34 |