Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Natalia O. Amelina

dblp:119/2006 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8792-2144ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 70% Parallel and multicore computing · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › consensus › relaxed consensus
approximate consensus
0.212015
Approximate Consensus in Stochastic Networks With Application to Load Balancing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Distributed systems
consensus
0.212015
Approximate Consensus in Stochastic Networks With Application to Load Balancing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.212015
Approximate Consensus in Stochastic Networks With Application to Load Balancing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112015
Approximate Consensus in Stochastic Networks With Application to Load Balancing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local voting protocol · 0.2averaged models · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Balancing Requests for Multi-Agent Distributed Servers in Augmented Reality Services
abstract
Multi-agent management strategies rely either on the classic client-server architecture or complex inter-agent communications. Distributed control algorithms allow you to balance the load. In this paper, an innovative technology for organizing a distributed structure of servers is considered in such a way as to reduce the computational load on the nearest servers while maintaining an adequate response time to client requests, regardless of the geographical location of both clients and servers in the network. The proposed model allows to reduce the impact of random interference on short-term tasks in the system and decrease the summary duration of all long-term tasks, improving the quality of the augmented reality service provided in general.
Ekaterina Moseiko, Yury Ivanskiy, Natalia O. Amelina
CoDIT3
2018 Toward Optimal Distributed Node Scheduling in a Multihop Wireless Network Through Local Voting
abstract
In a multihop wireless network, it is crucial but challenging to schedule transmissions in an efficient and fair manner. In this paper, a novel distributed node scheduling algorithm, called Local Voting, is proposed. This algorithm tries to semi-equalize the load (defined as the ratio of the queue length over the number of allocated slots) through slot reallocation based on local information exchange. The algorithm stems from the finding that the shortest delivery time or delay is obtained when the load is semi-equalized throughout the network. In addition, we prove that, with Local Voting, the network system converges asymptotically toward the optimal scheduling. Moreover, through extensive simulations, the performance of Local Voting is further investigated in comparison with several representative scheduling algorithms from the literature. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm achieves better performance than the other distributed algorithms in terms of average delay, maximum delay, and fairness. Despite being distributed, the performance of Local Voting is also found to be very close to a centralized algorithm that is deemed to have the optimal performance.
Dimitrios J. Vergados, Natalia O. Amelina, Yuming Jiang 0001, Katina Kralevska, Oleg N. Granichin
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.2
2016 Choice of step-size for consensus protocol in changing conditions via stochastic approximation type algorithm
abstract
In the paper a multi-agent network system of different computing nodes is considered. A problem of load balancing in the network is addressed. The problem is formulated as consensus achievement problem and solved via local voting protocol. Agents exchange information about their states in presence of noise in communication channels. At certain moment network system topology changes and new step size of control protocol is chosen to meet new conditions. Step size adjustment is done by stochastic approximation type algorithm. Analytically obtained optimal step size values are given. Simulation example demonstrating step size adjustment is provided.
Konstantin S. Amelin, Natalia O. Amelina, Yury Ivanskiy, Yuming Jiang 0001
CoDIT2
2016 Real-time task scheduling for multi-agent control system of UAV's group based on network-centric technology
abstract
The multi-agent approach and technology for distributed scheduling, coordination and control of several UAV in group in order to perform joint tasks in real time was considered. The network-centric multi-agent system for real-time task scheduling for UAV's group was proposed. Two part of sheduling initial scheduling and dynamic rescheduling (task redistributed) were considered. For real-time task redistributed the randomized local voting protocol was used. The architecture of system consists of three basic subsystem. The approach to the organization of subsystems and agents within each subsystem interaction was described).
Denis Budaev, Konstantin S. Amelin, Georgy Voschuk, Petr Skobelev, Natalia O. Amelina
CoDIT5
2015 Approximate Consensus in Stochastic Networks With Application to Load Balancing
abstract
This paper is devoted to the approximate consensus problem for stochastic networks of nonlinear agents with switching topology, noisy, and delayed information about agent states. A local voting protocol with nonvanishing (e.g., constant) step size is examined under time-varying environments of agents. To analyze dynamics of the closed-loop system, the so-called method of averaged models is used. It allows us to reduce analysis complexity of the closed-loop stochastic system. We derive the upper bounds for mean square distance between states of the initial stochastic system and its approximate averaged model. These upper bounds are used to obtain conditions for approximate consensus achievement. An application of general theoretical results to the load balancing problem in stochastic dynamic networks with incomplete information about the current states of agents and with changing set of communication links is considered. The conditions to achieve the optimal level of load balancing are established. The performance of the system is evaluated both analytically and by simulation.
Natalia O. Amelina, Alexander L. Fradkov, Yuming Jiang 0001, Dimitrios J. Vergados
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2012 Multi-agent Stochastic Systems with Switched Topology and Noise
abstract
In this paper the multi-agent stochastic systems are considered under randomly switched agents communications topology and noisy information about the current states of neighbouring agents. We study the consensus problem for such systems when controls actions are formed by the local voting protocol (stochastic approximation type algorithm). This protocol is applied to the load balancing distributed computer system and to the system of Unnamed Aerial Vehicles (the UAVs system). Obtained results are important for the control properties analysis of production or logistic networks, multiprocessor or multicomputer networks, etc.
Konstantin S. Amelin, Natalia O. Amelina, Oleg N. Granichin, Olga Granichina
SNPD2