Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

U. Cheng

dblp:119/4736 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › synchronization › timing recovery
data transition tracking loop
0.011995
The performance of the all-digital data transition tracking loop using nonlinear analysis · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
Physical-layer communications
synchronization
0.011995
The performance of the all-digital data transition tracking loop using nonlinear analysis · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
Physical-layer communications › synchronization
timing recovery
0.011995
The performance of the all-digital data transition tracking loop using nonlinear analysis · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
Physical-layer communications › synchronization
phase error analysis
0.011995
The performance of the all-digital data transition tracking loop using nonlinear analysis · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0nonlinear analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 The performance of the all-digital data transition tracking loop using nonlinear analysis
abstract
This paper describes the performance of the all digital data transition tracking loop (DTTL) with coherent and noncoherent sampling using nonlinear theory. The effects of few samples per symbol and of non-commensurate sampling and symbol rates are addressed and analyzed for perfectly square pulses as well as filtered pulses. Their impact on the probability density and variance of the phase error are quantified through computer simulations. It is shown that the performance of the all-digital DTTL approaches its analog counterpart when the sampling and symbol rates are noncommensurate (i.e., the number of samples per symbol is irrational). The phase error variance for an even number of samples per symbol is also shown to degrade compared to an odd number of samples per symbol.>
Alexander Mileant, Samson Million, Sami Hinedi, U. Cheng
IEEE Trans. Commun.4