Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fernando Krell
dblp:119/7736
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-4968-5106ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 6 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 88% Authentication and access control · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Query processing and optimization · 54% Information retrieval · 46% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure distributed computation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | VeriZexe: Decentralized Private Computation with Universal Setup · USENIX Security Symposium 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | VeriZexe: Decentralized Private Computation with Universal Setup · USENIX Security Symposium 2023 |
Authentication and access control
access control |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Malicious-Client Security in Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
private query |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
secure two-party computation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Secure two-party computation in sublinear (amortized) time · CCS 2012 |
Query processing and optimization › secure query processing
privacy-preserving query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Malicious-Client Security in Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Information retrieval › query processing
boolean query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
universal setup · 0.7decentralized private computation · 0.7semi-private function secure function evaluation · 0.4SPF-SFE · 0.4search pattern leakage · 0.4access control integration · 0.4oblivious data structure · 0.1circuit representation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | VeriZexe: Decentralized Private Computation with Universal Setup
Alex Luoyuan Xiong, Binyi Chen, Zhenfei Zhang, Benedikt Bünz, Ben Fisch, Fernando Krell, Philippe Camacho |
USENIX Security Symposium | 6 |
| 2018 | Asynchronous Provably-Secure Hidden Services
Philippe Camacho, Fernando Krell |
CT-RSA | 2 |
| 2017 | Low-Leakage Secure Search for Boolean Expressions
Fernando Krell, Gabriela F. Ciocarlie, Ashish Gehani, Mariana Raykova 0001 |
CT-RSA | 1 |
| 2015 | Malicious-Client Security in Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMSabstractThe Blind Seer system (Oakland 2014) is an efficient and scalable DBMS that affords both client query privacy and server data protection. It also provides the ability to enforce authorization policies on the system, restricting client's queries while maintaining the privacy of both query and policy. Blind Seer supports a rich query set, including arbitrary boolean formulas, and is provably secure with respect to a controlled amount of search pattern leakage. No other system to date achieves this tradeoff of performance, generality, and provable privacy. A major shortcoming of Blind Seer is its reliance on semi-honest security, particularly for access control and data protection. A malicious client could easily cheat the query authorization policy and obtain any database records satisfying any query of its choice, thus violating basic security features of any standard DBMS. In sum, Blind Seer offers additional privacy to a client, but sacrifices a basic security tenet of DBMS. In the present work, we completely resolve the issue of a malicious client. We show how to achieve robust access control and data protection in Blind Seer with virtually no added cost to performance or privacy. Our approach also involves a novel technique for a semi-private function secure function evaluation (SPF-SFE) that may have independent applications. We fully implement our solution and report on its performance. Ben Fisch, Binh Vo, Fernando Krell, Abishek Kumarasubramanian, Vladimir Kolesnikov, Tal Malkin, Steven M. Bellovin |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 3 |
| 2014 | Blind Seer: A Scalable Private DBMSabstractQuery privacy in secure DBMS is an important feature, although rarely formally considered outside the theoretical community. Because of the high overheads of guaranteeing privacy in complex queries, almost all previous works addressing practical applications consider limited queries (e.g., just keyword search), or provide a weak guarantee of privacy. In this work, we address a major open problem in private DB: efficient sub linear search for arbitrary Boolean queries. We consider scalable DBMS with provable security for all parties, including protection of the data from both server (who stores encrypted data) and client (who searches it), as well as protection of the query, and access control for the query. We design, build, and evaluate the performance of a rich DBMS system, suitable for real-world deployment on today medium-to large-scale DBs. On a modern server, we are able to query a formula over 10TB, 100M-record DB, with 70 searchable index terms per DB row, in time comparable to (insecure) MySQL (many practical queries can be privately executed with work 1.2-3 times slower than MySQL, although some queries are costlier). We support a rich query set, including searching on arbitrary boolean formulas on keywords and ranges, support for stemming, and free keyword searches over text fields. We identify and permit a reasonable and controlled amount of leakage, proving that no further leakage is possible. In particular, we allow leakage of some search pattern information, but protect the query and data, provide a high level of privacy for individual terms in the executed search formula, and hide the difference between a query that returned no results and a query that returned a very small result set. We also support private and complex access policies, integrated in the search process so that a query with empty result set and a query that fails the policy are hard to tell apart. Vasilis Pappas, Fernando Krell, Binh Vo, Vladimir Kolesnikov, Tal Malkin, Seung Geol Choi, Wesley George, Angelos D. Keromytis, Steven M. Bellovin |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 2 |
| 2012 | Secure two-party computation in sublinear (amortized) timeabstractTraditional approaches to generic secure computation begin by representing the function f being computed as a circuit. If f depends on each of its input bits, this implies a protocol with complexity at least linear in the input size. In fact, linear running time is inherent for non-trivial functions since each party must "touch" every bit of their input lest information about the other party's input be leaked. This seems to rule out many applications of secure computation (e.g., database search) in scenarios where inputs are huge. S. Dov Gordon, Jonathan Katz, Vladimir Kolesnikov, Fernando Krell, Tal Malkin, Mariana Raykova 0001, Yevgeniy Vahlis |
CCS | 4 |