Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandre Sarafianos
dblp:119/8421
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack › electromagnetic side channel
electromagnetic side-channel analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022 |
Hardware security and side channels
leakage analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022 |
Hardware security and side channels › hardware attacks
side-channel and fault attacks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022 |
Electronic design automation › power integrity
voltage drop analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
noise-to-add · 1.1magnetic field simulation · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Checking Robustness Against EM Side-Channel Attacks Prior to ManufacturingabstractElectromagnetic attacks, which in fact exploit essentially the magnetic field generated by ICs, are commonly used by adversaries to retrieve secret information manipulated by integrated circuits. Due to the increasing resolution and effectiveness of EM equipment used to perform these attacks, it is becoming increasingly difficult to design secure circuits robust enough to resist these attacks. The contribution of this article is threefold. First, it describes a simulation flow of the magnetic field radiated by ICs. The introduced flow is based on an industrial voltage drop tool: ANSYS RedHawk. Second, it introduces a methodology to localize the root cause of leakages in ICs as well as EM hotspots, i.e., positions above the IC surface, where an adversary can place its probe to capture secrets. The latter contribution is based on the concept of noise to add, which is introduced in this article in order to overcome the absence of noise in simulations (noise which is omnipresent in practice) that limits their interpretability. Finally, the article demonstrates the soundness of the proposed solution by confronting simulation results with measurements. Davide Poggi, Thomas Ordas, Alexandre Sarafianos, Philippe Maurine |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 3 |
| 2015 | Experimental validation of a Bulk Built-In Current Sensor for detecting laser-induced currentsabstractBulk Built-In Current Sensors (BBICS) were developed to detect the transient bulk currents induced in the bulk of integrated circuits when hit by ionizing particles or pulsed laser. This paper reports the experimental evaluation of a complete BBICS architecture, designed to simultaneously monitor PMOS and NMOS transistors, under Photoelectric Laser Stimulation (PLS). The obtained results are the first experimental proof of the efficiency of BBICS in laser fault injection detection attempts. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of BBICS tapping in a sensitive area (logical gates) for improved laser detection. It studies the performances of this BBICS architecture and suggests modifications for its future implementation. Clement Champeix, Nicolas Borrel, Jean-Max Dutertre, Bruno Robisson, Mathieu Lisart, Alexandre Sarafianos |
IOLTS | 6 |
| 2015 | Laser fault injection into SRAM cells: Picosecond versus nanosecond pulsesabstractLaser fault injection into SRAM cells is a widely used technique to perform fault attacks. In previous works, Roscian and Sarafianos studied the relations between the layout of the cell, its different laser-sensitive areas and their associated fault model using 50 ns duration laser pulses. In this paper, we report similar experiments carried out using shorter laser pulses (30 ps duration instead of 50 ns). Laser-sensitive areas that did not appear at 50 ns were observed. Additionally, these experiments confirmed the validity of the bit-set/bit-reset fault model over the bit-flip one. We also propose an upgrade of the simulation model they used to take into account laser pulses in the picosecond range. Finally, we performed additional laser fault injection experiments on the RAM memory of a microcontroller to validate the previous results. Marc Lacruche, Nicolas Borrel, Clement Champeix, Cyril Roscian, Alexandre Sarafianos, Jean-Baptiste Rigaud, Jean-Max Dutertre, Edith Kussener |
IOLTS | 5 |
| 2014 | Laser-induced fault effects in security-dedicated circuitsabstractLasers have become one of the most efficient means to attack secure integrated systems. Actual faults or errors induced in the system depend on many parameters, including the circuit technology and the laser characteristics. Understanding the physical effects is mandatory to correctly evaluate during the design flow the potential consequences of a laser-based attack and implement efficient counter-measures. This paper presents results obtained within the LIESSE project, aiming at defining a comprehensive approach for designers. Outcomes include the definition of fault/error models at several levels of abstraction, specific CAD tools using these models and new counter-measures well-suited to thwart laser-based attacks. Actual measures on components manufactured in the new 28 nm FDSOI technology are also presented. Régis Leveugle, Paolo Maistri, Pierre Vanhauwaert, Giorgio Di Natale, Marie-Lise Flottes, Bruno Rouzeyre, Athanasios Papadimitriou, David Hély, Vincent Beroulle, Guillaume Hubert, Stephan De Castro, Jean-Max Dutertre, Alexandre Sarafianos, Noemie Beringuier-Boher, Mathieu Lisart, Joel Damiens, Philippe Candelier, Clément Tavernier |
VLSI-SoC | 14 |
| 2013 | Fault Model Analysis of Laser-Induced Faults in SRAM Memory CellsabstractThe use of a laser to inject faults into SRAM memory cells is well known. However, the corresponding fault model is often unknown or misunderstood: the induced faults may be described as bit-flip or bit-set/reset faults. We have investigated in this paper whether the bit-set/reset fault model or bit-flip fault model may be encountered in SRAMs. First, the fault model of a standalone SRAM was considered. Experiments revealed that the relevant fault model was the bit-set/reset. This result was further investigated through electrical simulations based on the use of an electrical model of MOS transistors under laser illumination. Then, fault injections have been performed on the RAM memory of a micro-controller to check the validity of the previous results based on experiments and simulations. Cyril Roscian, Alexandre Sarafianos, Jean-Max Dutertre, Assia Tria |
FDTC | 2 |