In this paper we consider the problem of repairing missing is-a relations in ontologies. We formalize the problem as a generalized TBox abduction problem (GTAP). Based on this abduction framework, we present complexity results for the existence, relevance and necessity decision problems for the GTAP with and without some specific preference relations for ontologies that can be represented using a member of the EL family of description logics. Further, we present algorithms for finding solutions, a system as well as experiments.

Both semantic and type-based query optimization rely on the idea that queries often exhibit non-trivial rewritings if the state space of the database is restricted. Despite their close connection, these two problems to date have always been studied separately. We present a unifying, logic-based framework for query optimization in the presence of data dependencies and type information. It builds upon the classical chase algorithm and extends existing query minimization techniques to considerably larger classes of queries and dependencies. In particular, our setting requires chasing conjunctive queries (possibly with union and negation) in the presence of dependencies containing negation and disjunction. We study the applicability of the chase in this setting, develop novel conditions that guarantee its termination, identify fragments for which minimal query computation is always possible (w.r.t. a generic cost function), and investigate the complexity of related decision problems.

Efficient shortest path query answering in large graphs is enjoying a growing number of applications, such as ranked keyword search in databases, social networks, ontology reasoning and bioinformatics. A shortest path query on a graph finds the shortest path for the given source and target vertices in the graph.

Bounded treewidth and monadic second-order (MSO) logic have proved to be key concepts in establishing fixed-parameter tractability results. Indeed, by Courcelle's Theorem we know that any property of finite structures, which is expressible by an MSO sentence, can be decided in linear time (data complexity) if the structures have bounded treewidth. In principle, Courcelle's Theorem can be applied directly to construct concrete algorithms by transforming the MSO evaluation problem into a tree language recognition problem. The latter can then be solved via a finite tree automaton (FTA). However, this approach has turned out to be problematical, since even relatively simple MSO formulae may lead to a “state explosion” of the FTA. In this work we propose monadic datalog (i.e., datalog where all intentional predicate symbols are unary) as an alternative method to tackle this class of fixed-parameter tractable problems. We show that if some property of finite structures is expressible in MSO then this property can also be expressed by means of a monadic datalog program over the decomposed structure : we mean by this that the original structure is augmented with new elements and new relations that encode one of its tree decompositions. In the first place, we thus compare the expressive power of two query languages. However, we also show that the resulting fragment of datalog can be evaluated in linear time (both with respect to the program size and with respect to the data size). Hence, our transformation of an MSO query into a monadic datalog program yields an alternative proof of Courcelle's Theorem. In order to actually construct efficient algorithms for problems whose tractability is due to Courcelle's Theorem, we propose to use a fragment of full (i.e., not necessarily monadic) datalog which allows for a succinct representation of the corresponding monadic datalog programs and for an efficient execution. This new approach is put to work by devising datalog programs for the 3-Colorability problem of graphs and for the PRIMALITY problem of relational schemas (i.e., testing if some attribute in a relational schema is part of a key). We also report on experimental results with a prototype implementation.

In this paper, we present our work on evaluating the skyline algorithms BNL, SFS, and a variant of LESS in PostgreSQL. It is well known that the performance of skyline queries is sensitive to a number of parameters. From extensive experiments on skyline implementations we have discovered several rules, which are remarkably simple and useful, but hard to obtain from theoretical investigation. Our findings are beneficial for developing heuristics for the skyline query optimization, and in the meantime, provide some insight for a deeper understanding of the skyline query characteristics.

The design of containment checking algorithms for conjunctive queries with arithmetic comparisons and safe negations (CQ­s) is fundamental to many database applications. However, it is a challenging task due to the intractability of the problem. Existing algorithms are either computationally too expensive, or capable to deal with only a fragment of these extensions.

Bounded treewidth and Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic have proved to be key concepts in establishing fixed-para-meter tractability results. Indeed, by Courcelle's Theorem we know: Any property of finite structures, which is expressible by an MSO sentence, can be decided in linear time (data complexity) if the structures have bounded treewidth.

Given that most elementary problems in database design are NP-hard, the currently used database design algorithms produce suboptimal results. For example, the current 3NF decomposition algorithms may continue further decomposing a relation even though it is already in 3NF. In this paper we study database design problems whose sets of functional dependencies have bounded treewidth. For such sets, which frequently occur in practice, we develop polynomial-time and highly parallelizable algorithms for a number of central database design problems such as: • primality of an attribute • 3NF-test for a relational schema or subschema • BCNF-test for a subschema.For establishing these results, we propose a new characterization for keys and for the primality of a single attribute.In order to define the treewidth of a relational schema, we shall associate a hypergraph with it. Note that there are two main possibilities of defining the treewidth of a hypergraph H: One is via the primal graph of H and one is via the incidence graph of H. Our algorithms apply to the case where the primal graph is considered. However, we also show that the tractability results still hold when the incidence graph is considered instead.