Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sander van Dijk
dblp:12/1241
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Evaluating semantic indexing techniques through cross-language fingerprinting · SIGIR 2005 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Evaluating semantic indexing techniques through cross-language fingerprinting · SIGIR 2005 |
Information retrieval › indexing
semantic indexing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Evaluating semantic indexing techniques through cross-language fingerprinting · SIGIR 2005 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › latent semantic models
latent semantic indexing |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Evaluating semantic indexing techniques through cross-language fingerprinting · SIGIR 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fingerprinting · 0.1cross-language evaluation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A Fingerprinting Technique for Evaluating Semantics Based Indexing
Eduard Hoenkamp, Sander van Dijk |
ECIR | 2 |
| 2005 | Evaluating semantic indexing techniques through cross-language fingerprintingabstractUsers in search of on-line document sources are usually looking for content, not words. Hence, IR researchers generally agree that search techniques should be geared toward the meaning underlying documents rather than toward the text itself. The most visible examples of such techniques are Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), and the Hyperspace Analog to Language (HAL). If these techniques really uncover semantic dependencies, then they should be applicable across languages. We investigated this using electronic versions of three kinds of translated material: a novel, a popular treatise about cosmology, and a data base of technical specifications. We used the analogy of fingerprinting used in forensics to establish if individuals are related. Genetic fingerprinting uses enzymes to split the DNA and then compare the resulting band patterns. Likewise, in our research we use queries to split a document into fragments. If a search technique really isolates fragments related to the query, then a document and its translation should have similar band patterns. In this paper we (1) present the fingerprinting technique, (2) introduce the material used, and (3) report preliminary results of an evaluation for two semantic indexing techniques. Eduard Hoenkamp, Sander van Dijk |
SIGIR | 2 |