VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
John Peyton
dblp:12/1647
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
interprocedural optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Scalable Cross-Module Optimization · PLDI 1998 |
Compilers and program optimization › dynamic optimization
profile-guided optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Scalable Cross-Module Optimization · PLDI 1998 |
Software maintenance and evolution
build systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Scalable Cross-Module Optimization · PLDI 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
profile data management · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Scalable Cross-Module OptimizationabstractLarge applications are typically partitioned into separately compiled modules. Large performance gains in these applications are available by optimizing across module boundaries. One barrier to applying crossmodule optimization (CMO) to large applications is the potentially enormous amount of time and space consumed by the optimization process.We describe a framework for scalable CMO that provides large gains in performance on applications that contain millions of lines of code. Two major techniques are described. First, careful management of in-memory data structures results in sub-linear memory occupancy when compared to the number of lines of code being optimized. Second, profile data is used to focus optimization effort on the performance-critical portions of applications. We also present practical issues that arise in deploying this framework in a production environment. These issues include debuggability and compatibility with existing development tools, such as make. Our framework is deployed in Hewlett-Packard's (HP) UNIX compiler products and speeds up shipped independent software vendors' applications by as much as 71%. Andrew Ayers, Stuart de Jong, John Peyton, Richard Schooler |
PLDI | 3 |