We initiate a systematic study of pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms. These are quantum algorithms that, for any input, output a canonical solution with high probability. Focusing on the query complexity model, our main contributions include the following complexity separations, which require new lower bound techniques specifically tailored to pseudo-determinism: - We exhibit a problem, Avoid One Encrypted String (AOES), whose classical randomized query complexity is O(1) but is maximally hard for pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms (Ω(N) query complexity). - We exhibit a problem, Quantum-Locked Estimation (QL-Estimation), for which pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit an exponential speed-up over classical pseudo-deterministic algorithms (O(log(N)) vs. Θ(√N)), while the randomized query complexity is O(1). Complementing these separations, we show that for any total problem R, pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit at most a quintic advantage over deterministic algorithms, i.e., 𝖣(R) = Õ(psQ(R)⁵). On the algorithmic side, we identify a class of quantum search problems that can be made pseudo-deterministic with small overhead, including Grover search, element distinctness, triangle finding, k-sum, and graph collision.

We initiate a systematic study of TFZPP, the class of total NP search problems solvable by polynomial time randomized algorithms. TFZPP contains a variety of important search problems such as Bertrand-Chebyshev (finding a prime between N and 2N), refuter problems for many circuit lower bounds, and Lossy-Code. The Lossy-Code problem has found prominence due to its fundamental connections to derandomization, catalytic computing, and the metamathematics of complexity theory, among other areas. While TFZPP collapses to FP under standard derandomization assumptions in the white-box setting, we are able to separate TFZPP from the major TFNP subclasses in the black-box setting. In fact, we are able to separate it from every uniform TFNP class assuming that NP is not in quasi-polynomial time. To do so, we extend the connection between proof complexity and black-box TFNP to randomized proof systems and randomized reductions. Next, we turn to developing a taxonomy of TFZPP problems. We highlight a problem called Nephew, originating from an infinity axiom in set theory. We show that Nephew is in PWPP∩ TFZPP and conjecture that it is not reducible to Lossy-Code. Intriguingly, except for some artificial examples, most other black-box TFZPP problems that we are aware of reduce to Lossy-Code: - We define a problem called Empty-Child capturing finding a leaf in a rooted (binary) tree, and show that this problem is equivalent to Lossy-Code. We also show that a variant of Empty-Child with "heights" is complete for the intersection of SOPL and Lossy-Code. - We strengthen Lossy-Code with several combinatorial inequalities such as the AM-GM inequality. Somewhat surprisingly, we show the resulting new problems are still reducible to Lossy-Code. A technical highlight of this result is that they are proved by formalizations in bounded arithmetic, specifically in Jeřábek’s theory APC₁ (JSL 2007). - Finally, we show that the Dense-Linear-Ordering problem reduces to Lossy-Code.

We study the *refuter* problems for proof complexity lower bounds. Suppose ϕ is a hard tautology that does not admit any length-s proof in some proof system P. In the corresponding refuter problem, we are given (query access to) a purported length-s proof π in P that claims to have proved ϕ, and our goal is to find an invalid derivation step within π. As suggested by witnessing theorems in bounded arithmetic, the *computational complexity* of these refuter problems is closely tied to the *metamathematics* of the underlying lower bounds.

We exhibit a total search problem with classically verifiable solutions whose communication complexity in the quantum SMP model is exponentially smaller than in the classical two-way randomized model. Our problem is a bipartite version of a query complexity problem recently introduced by Yamakawa and Zhandry (JACM 2024). We prove the classical lower bound using the structure-vs-randomness paradigm for analyzing communication protocols.

We show that the TFNP problem Ramsey is not black-box reducible to Pigeon, refuting a conjecture of Goldberg and Papadimitriou in the black-box setting. We prove this by giving reductions to Ramsey from a new family of TFNP problems that correspond to generalized versions of the pigeonhole principle, and then proving that these generalized versions cannot be reduced to Pigeon. Formally, we define$t$-PPP as the class of total NP-search problems reducible to finding a$t$-collision in a mapping from$(t-1) N + 1$pigeons to$N$holes. These classes are closely related to multi-collision resistant hash functions in cryptography. We show that the generalized pigeonhole classes form a hierarchy as$t$increases, and also give a natural condition on the parameters$t_{1}, t_{2}$that captures exactly when$t_{1}$-PPP and$t_2$-PPP collapse in the black-box setting. Finally, we prove other inclusion and separation results between these generalized Pigeon problems and other previously studied TFNP subclasses, such as PLS, PPA, and PLC. Our separation results rely on new lower bounds in propositional proof complexity based on pseudoexpectation operators, which may be of independent interest.

Weitzman (1979) introduced the Pandora Box problem as a model for sequential search with inspection costs, and gave an elegant index-based policy that attains provably optimal expected payoff. In various scenarios, the searching agent may select an option without making a costly inspection. The variant of the Pandora box problem with non-obligatory inspection has attracted interest from both economics and algorithms researchers. Various simple algorithms have proved suboptimal, with the best known 0.8-approximation algorithm due to Guha et al. (2008). No hardness result for the problem was known.

We consider the query complexity of finding a local minimum of a function defined on a graph, where at most $k$ rounds of interaction (aka adaptivity) with the oracle are allowed. Adaptivity is a fundamental concept studied due to the need to parallelize computation and understand the speedups attainable. The query complexity of local search is tightly related to the complexity of computing stationary points of a function, thus bounds for local search can give insights into the performance of algorithms such as gradient descent. We focus on the $d$-dimensional grid $\{1, 2, \ldots, n \}^d$, where the dimension $d \geq 2$ is a constant. Our main contribution is to give algorithms and lower bounds that characterize the trade-off between the number of rounds of adaptivity and the query complexity of local search, when the number of rounds is constant and polynomial in $n$, respectively. The local search analysis also enables us to characterize the query complexity of computing a Brouwer fixed point in rounds. Our proof technique for lower bounding the query complexity in rounds may be of independent interest as an alternative to the classical relational adversary method of Aaronson from the fully adaptive setting.

A polymatrix game is a multi-player game over n players, where each player chooses a pure strategy from a list of its own pure strategies. The utility of each player is a sum of payoffs it gains from the two player's game from all its neighbors, under its chosen strategy and that of its neighbor. As a natural extension to two-player games (a.k.a. bimatrix games), polymatrix games are widely used for multi-agent games in real world scenarios. In this paper we show that the problem of approximating a Nash equilibrium in a polymatrix game within the polynomial precision is PPAD-hard, even in sparse and win-lose ones. This result further challenges the predictability of Nash equilibria as a solution concept in the multi-agent setting. We also propose a simple and efficient algorithm, when the game is further restricted. Together, we establish a new dichotomy theorem for this class of games. It is also of independent interest for exploring the computational and structural properties in Nash equilibria.