Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Donald A. Alton

dblp:12/4990 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1977
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 87% Logic in computer science · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
complexity measures
0.011977
"Natural" Complexity Measures and Time versus Memory: Some Definitional Proposals · ICALP 1977
Logic in computer science › model theory
definability
0.011977
"Natural" Complexity Measures and Time versus Memory: Some Definitional Proposals · ICALP 1977

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

complexity theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1977 "Natural" Complexity Measures and Time versus Memory: Some Definitional Proposals
Donald A. Alton
ICALP1
1976 Nonexistence of Program Optimizers in Several Abstract Settings
Donald A. Alton
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1976 Diversity of Speed-Ups and Embeddability in Computational Complexity
abstract
The theory of computational complexity deals with those functions which can be computed subject to certain restrictions on the resources (for instance, time or memory) available for computation. Blum [5] gave an axiomatic characterization of some of the properties which should be possessed by a measure of computational complexity and established the existence of speed-upable functions—computable functions which fail to possess optimal programs in a particularly strong sense. Recursion theorists tend to like such functions, and people concerned with the specifics of real computing tend to consider such functions somewhat pathological. In Theorem 2 we show that such pathology is rampant: there is a great diversity of behavior among the collections of “run-times” of different functions which do not possess optimal programs, where such diversity is gauged by certain algebraic criteria which have computational significance. Roughly speaking, these algebraic criteria concern the ways in which various functions can be intermixed to satisfy requirements that certain functions can or cannot be computed more easily than certain other functions. (More detailed motivation for the relevance of these algebraic notions is given later.) Specifically, in Theorem 2 we generalize the embeddability theorem of McCreight and Meyer [12] (discussed below) by making speed-upable functions responsible for the embedding.
Donald A. Alton
J. Symb. Log.1
1971 Recursively Enumerable Sets Which are Uniform for Finite Extensions
abstract
Let W0, W1 … be one of the usual enumerations of recursively enumerable (r.e.) subsets of the set N of nonnegative integers. (Background information will be given later.) Suggestions of Anil Nerode led to the following Definitions. Let B be a subset of N and let ψ be a partial recursive function.
Donald A. Alton
J. Symb. Log.1