Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karim H. Tadros
dblp:12/5667
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 33% Parallel and multicore computing · 33% Performance modeling and evaluation · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › numerical algorithms
finite difference time domain |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Massively parallel algorithms for scattering in optical lithography · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
massively parallel algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Massively parallel algorithms for scattering in optical lithography · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
time-domain finite-difference method · 0.0electromagnetic scattering simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Massively parallel algorithms for scattering in optical lithographyabstractA novel massively parallel technique for rigorous simulation of topography scattering in optical lithography has been developed and tested. The method is equivalent to the time-domain finite-difference method (TDFDM) used in electromagnetic scattering simulations, but exploits the parallel nature of wave propagation and the power of recent massively parallel architectures such as the Connection Machine. A working code called TEMPEST has been implemented on a Connection Machine CM-2 having 1 to 32 K processors with up to 1 M virtual processors. Numerical accuracy comparable with that of other fully rigorous methods was achieved. A very significant finding was that the solution required constant time per iteration for problems ranging from a few thousand unknowns up to one million, provided the ratio between the problem size and the number of processors is kept constant. The suitability of TEMPEST for solving a large class of topography structures important in alignment, metrology, and lithography is illustrated by examples.> Roberto Guerrieri, Karim H. Tadros, John K. Gamelin, Andrew R. Neureuther |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |