Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Fogel
dblp:12/7027
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5398-6622ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
cell-type deconvolution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A2Sign: Agnostic Algorithms for Signatures - a universal method for identifying molecular signatures from transcriptomic datasets prior to cell-type deconvolution · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
molecular signature analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A2Sign: Agnostic Algorithms for Signatures - a universal method for identifying molecular signatures from transcriptomic datasets prior to cell-type deconvolution · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A2Sign: Agnostic Algorithms for Signatures - a universal method for identifying molecular signatures from transcriptomic datasets prior to cell-type deconvolution · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Inferential, robust non-negative matrix factorization analysis of microarray data · Bioinform. 2007 The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Inferential, robust non-negative matrix factorization analysis of microarray data · Bioinform. 2007 The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
differentially expressed gene identification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
non-negative tensor factorization · 0.6matrix factorization · 0.6sequential statistical testing · 0.1non-negative matrix factorization · 0.1permutation testing · 0.0mean squared error binning · 0.0ANOVA · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A2Sign: Agnostic Algorithms for Signatures - a universal method for identifying molecular signatures from transcriptomic datasets prior to cell-type deconvolutionabstractMOTIVATION: Molecular signatures are critical for inferring the proportions of cell types from bulk transcriptomics data. However, the identification of these signatures is based on a methodology that relies on prior biological knowledge of the cell types being studied. When working with less known biological material, a data-driven approach is required to uncover the underlying classes and generate ad hoc signatures from healthy or pathogenic tissue. RESULTS: We present a new approach, A2Sign: Agnostic Algorithms for Signatures, based on a non-negative tensor factorization (NTF) strategy that allows us to identify cell-type-specific molecular signatures, greatly reduce collinearities and also account for inter-individual variability. We propose a global framework that can be applied to uncover molecular signatures for cell-type deconvolution in arbitrary tissues using bulk transcriptome data. We also present two new molecular signatures for deconvolution of up to 16 immune cell types using microarray or RNA-seq data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All steps of our analysis were implemented in annotated Python notebooks (https://github.com/paulfogel/A2SIGN). To perform NTF, we used the NMTF package, which can be downloaded using Python pip install. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Galina Boldina, Paul Fogel, Corinne Rocher, Charles Bettembourg, George Luta, Franck Augé |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2007 | Inferential, robust non-negative matrix factorization analysis of microarray dataabstractMOTIVATION: Modern methods such as microarrays, proteomics and metabolomics often produce datasets where there are many more predictor variables than observations. Research in these areas is often exploratory; even so, there is interest in statistical methods that accurately point to effects that are likely to replicate. Correlations among predictors are used to improve the statistical analysis. We exploit two ideas: non-negative matrix factorization methods that create ordered sets of predictors; and statistical testing within ordered sets which is done sequentially, removing the need for correction for multiple testing within the set. RESULTS: Simulations and theory point to increased statistical power. Computational algorithms are described in detail. The analysis and biological interpretation of a real dataset are given. In addition to the increased power, the benefit of our method is that the organized gene lists are likely to lead better understanding of the biology. AVAILABILITY: An SAS JMP executable script is available from http://www.niss.org/irMF Paul Fogel, S. Stanley Young, Douglas M. Hawkins, Nathalie Ledirac |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray dataabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray technology has become a powerful research tool in many fields of study; however, the cost of microarrays often results in the use of a low number of replicates (k). Under circumstances where k is low, it becomes difficult to perform standard statistical tests to extract the most biologically significant experimental results. Other more advanced statistical tests have been developed; however, their use and interpretation often remain difficult to implement in routine biological research. The present work outlines a method that achieves sufficient statistical power for selecting differentially expressed genes under conditions of low k, while remaining as an intuitive and computationally efficient procedure. RESULTS: The present study describes a Global Error Assessment (GEA) methodology to select differentially expressed genes in microarray datasets, and was developed using an in vitro experiment that compared control and interferon-gamma treated skin cells. In this experiment, up to nine replicates were used to confidently estimate error, thereby enabling methods of different statistical power to be compared. Gene expression results of a similar absolute expression are binned, so as to enable a highly accurate local estimate of the mean squared error within conditions. The model then relates variability of gene expression in each bin to absolute expression levels and uses this in a test derived from the classical ANOVA. The GEA selection method is compared with both the classical and permutational ANOVA tests, and demonstrates an increased stability, robustness and confidence in gene selection. A subset of the selected genes were validated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All these results suggest that GEA methodology is (i) suitable for selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data, (ii) intuitive and computationally efficient and (iii) especially advantageous under conditions of low k. AVAILABILITY: The GEA code for R software is freely available upon request to authors. Robert Mansourian, David M. Mutch, Nicolas Antille, Jerome Aubert, Paul Fogel, Jean-Marc Le Goff, Julie Moulin, Anton Petrov, Andreas Rytz, Johannes J. Voegel, Matthew-Alan Roberts |
Bioinform. | 5 |