Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dan Bikel
dblp:120/7450 · also Daniel Bikel, Daniel M. Bikel
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
6as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 6 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 69% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Language models and text generation · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 99% Knowledge graphs · 1% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation Safety · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation Safety · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › generative model safety
safe generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation Safety · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
safety alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation Safety · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Dual Encoder Architectures for Question Answering · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Dual Encoder Architectures for Question Answering · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Benchmarking Scalable Methods for Streaming Cross Document Entity Coreference · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
cross-document coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Benchmarking Scalable Methods for Streaming Cross Document Entity Coreference · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation Safety · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Dual Encoder Architectures for Question Answering · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | A Distributional Analysis of a Lexicalized Statistical Parsing Mode · EMNLP 2004 A Statistical Model for Parsing and Word-Sense Disambiguation · EMNLP 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.1 | 2 | 2000 | A Statistical Model for Parsing and Word-Sense Disambiguation · EMNLP 2000 Automatic WordNet Mapping Using Word Sense Disambiguation · EMNLP 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
statistical parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Statistical Model for Parsing and Word-Sense Disambiguation · EMNLP 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
t-SNE · 1.1supervised fine-tuning · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9word sense disambiguation · 0.1bilingual MRD linking · 0.1distributional analysis · 0.0statistical model · 0.0joint inference · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Backtracking Improves Generation SafetyabstractText generation has a fundamental limitation almost by definition: there is no taking back tokens that have been generated, even when they are clearly problematic.
In the context of language model safety, when a partial unsafe generation is produced, language models by their nature tend to happily keep on generating similarly unsafe additional text.
This is in fact how safety alignment of frontier models gets circumvented in the wild, despite great efforts in improving their safety.
Deviating from the paradigm of approaching safety alignment as prevention (decreasing the probability of harmful responses), we propose backtracking, a technique that allows language models to "undo" and recover from their own unsafe generation through the introduction of a special [RESET] token.
Our method can be incorporated into either SFT or DPO training to optimize helpfulness and harmlessness.
We show that models trained to backtrack are consistently safer than baseline models: backtracking Llama-3-8B is four times more safe than the baseline model (6.1\% $\to$ 1.5\%) in our evaluations without regression in helpfulness.
Our method additionally provides protection against four adversarial attacks including an adaptive attack, despite not being trained to do so. Jianfeng Chi, Hailey Nguyen, Kartikeya Upasani, Dan Bikel, Jason Weston, Eric Michael Smith |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2022 | Exploring Dual Encoder Architectures for Question AnsweringabstractDual encoders have been used for questionanswering (QA) and information retrieval (IR) tasks with good results.Previous research focuses on two major types of dual encoders, Siamese Dual Encoder (SDE), with parameters shared across two encoders, and Asymmetric Dual Encoder (ADE), with two distinctly parameterized encoders.In this work, we explore different ways in which the dual encoder can be structured, and evaluate how these differences can affect their efficacy in terms of QA retrieval tasks.By evaluating on MS MARCO, open domain NQ and the Mul-tiReQA benchmarks, we show that SDE performs significantly better than ADE.We further propose three different improved versions of ADEs by sharing or freezing parts of the architectures between two encoder towers.We find that sharing parameters in projection layers would enable ADEs to perform competitively with or outperform SDEs.We further explore and explain why parameter sharing in projection layer significantly improves the efficacy of the dual encoders, by directly probing the embedding spaces of the two encoder towers with t-SNE algorithm (van der Maaten and Hinton, 2008). Jianmo Ni, Dan Bikel, Enrique Alfonseca, Chen Qu 0001, Imed Zitouni |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2021 | Benchmarking Scalable Methods for Streaming Cross Document Entity CoreferenceabstractRobert L Logan IV, Andrew McCallum, Sameer Singh, Dan Bikel. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Robert L. Logan IV, Andrew McCallum, Sameer Singh 0001, Dan Bikel |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2013 | Refr: an open-source reranker framework
Dan Bikel, Keith B. Hall |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2012 | Semi-supervised discriminative language modeling for Turkish ASRabstractWe present our work on semi-supervised learning of discriminative language models where the negative examples for sentences in a text corpus are generated using confusion models for Turkish at various granularities, specifically, word, sub-word, syllable and phone levels. We experiment with different language models and various sampling strategies to select competing hypotheses for training with a variant of the perceptron algorithm. We find that morph-based confusion models with a sample selection strategy aiming to match the error distribution of the baseline ASR system gives the best performance. We also observe that substituting half of the supervised training examples with those obtained in a semi-supervised manner gives similar results. Arda Çelebi, Hasim Sak, Erinç Dikici, Murat Saraclar, Maider Lehr, Emily Tucker Prud'hommeaux, Puyang Xu, Nathan Glenn, Damianos Karakos, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Brian Roark, Kenji Sagae, Izhak Shafran, Dan Bikel, Chris Callison-Burch, Yuan Cao 0007, Keith B. Hall, Eva Hasler, Philipp Koehn, Adam Lopez, Matt Post, Darcey Riley |
ICASSP | 14 |
| 2012 | Hallucinated n-best lists for discriminative language modelingabstractThis paper investigates semi-supervised methods for discriminative language modeling, whereby n-best lists are “hallucinated” for given reference text and are then used for training n-gram language models using the perceptron algorithm. We perform controlled experiments on a very strong baseline English CTS system, comparing three methods for simulating ASR output, and compare the results with training with “real” n-best list output from the baseline recognizer. We find that methods based on extracting phrasal cohorts - similar to methods from machine translation for extracting phrase tables - yielded the largest gains of our three methods, achieving over half of the WER reduction of the fully supervised methods. Kenji Sagae, Maider Lehr, Emily Tucker Prud'hommeaux, Puyang Xu, Nathan Glenn, Damianos Karakos, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Brian Roark, Murat Saraclar, Izhak Shafran, Dan Bikel, Chris Callison-Burch, Yuan Cao 0007, Keith B. Hall, Eva Hasler, Philipp Koehn, Adam Lopez, Matt Post, Darcey Riley |
ICASSP | 11 |
| 2012 | Continuous space discriminative language modelingabstractDiscriminative language modeling is a structured classification problem. Log-linear models have been previously used to address this problem. In this paper, the standard dot-product feature representation used in log-linear models is replaced by a non-linear function parameterized by a neural network. Embeddings are learned for each word and features are extracted automatically through the use of convolutional layers. Experimental results show that as a stand-alone model the continuous space model yields significantly lower word error rate (1% absolute), while having a much more compact parameterization (60%-90% smaller). If the baseline scores are combined, our approach performs equally well. Puyang Xu, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Maider Lehr, Emily Tucker Prud'hommeaux, Nathan Glenn, Damianos Karakos, Brian Roark, Kenji Sagae, Murat Saraclar, Izhak Shafran, Dan Bikel, Chris Callison-Burch, Yuan Cao 0007, Keith B. Hall, Eva Hasler, Philipp Koehn, Adam Lopez, Matt Post, Darcey Riley |
ICASSP | 11 |
| 2012 | Deriving conversation-based features from unlabeled speech for discriminative language modeling
Damianos Karakos, Brian Roark, Izhak Shafran, Kenji Sagae, Maider Lehr, Emily Tucker Prud'hommeaux, Puyang Xu, Nathan Glenn, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Murat Saraclar, Dan Bikel, Mark Dredze, Chris Callison-Burch, Yuan Cao 0007, Keith B. Hall, Eva Hasler, Philipp Koehn, Adam Lopez, Matt Post, Darcey Riley |
INTERSPEECH | 11 |
| 2012 | On-the-fly Topic Adaptation for YouTube Video TranscriptionabstractAutomatic closed-captioning of video is a useful application of speech recognition technology but poses numerous challenges when applied to open-domain user-uploaded videos such as those on YouTube.In this work, we explore a strategy to improve decoding accuracy for video transcription by decoding each video with a language model (LM) adapted specifically to the topics that the video covers.Taxonomic topic classifiers are used to determine the topic content of videos and to build a large set of topic-specific LMs from web documents.We consider strategies for selecting and interpolating LMs in both supervised and unsupervised scenarios in a two-pass lattice rescoring framework.Experiments on a YouTube video corpus show a 3.6 absolute reduction in WER over generic single-pass transcriptions as well as a statistically significant 0.8 absolute improvement over rescoring with a very large non-adapted LM built from all the documents. Kapil Thadani, Fadi Biadsy, Dan Bikel |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2004 | A Distributional Analysis of a Lexicalized Statistical Parsing Mode
Dan Bikel |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2004 | Intricacies of Collins' Parsing ModelabstractThis article documents a large set of heretofore unpublished details Collins used in his parser, such that, along with Collins' (1999) thesis, this article contains all information necessary to duplicate Collins' benchmark results. Indeed, these as-yet-unpublished details account for an 11% relative increase in error from an implementation including all details to a clean-room implementation of Collins' model. We also show a cleaner and equally well-performing method for the handling of punctuation and conjunction and reveal certain other probabilistic oddities about Collins' parser. We not only analyze the effect of the unpublished details, but also reanalyze the effect of certain well-known details, revealing that bilexical dependencies are barely used by the model and that head choice is not nearly as important to overall parsing performance as once thought. Finally, we perform experiments that show that the true discriminative power of lexicalization appears to lie in the fact that unlexicalized syntactic structures are generated conditioning on the headword and its part of speech. Dan Bikel |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2002 | Recovering Latent Information in Treebanks
David Chiang 0001, Dan Bikel |
COLING | 2 |
| 2000 | Automatic WordNet Mapping Using Word Sense DisambiguationabstractThis paper presents the automatic construction of a Korean WordNet from pre-existing lexical resources. A set of automatic WSD techniques is described for linking Korean words collected from a bilingual MRD to English WordNet synsets. We will show how individual linking provided by each WSD method is then combined to produce a Korean WordNet for nouns. Dan Bikel |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2000 | A Statistical Model for Parsing and Word-Sense DisambiguationabstractThis paper describes a first attempt at a statistical model for simultaneous syntactic parsing and generalized word-sense disambiguation. On a new data set we have constructed for the task, while we were disappointed not to find parsing improvement over a traditional parsing model, our model achieves a recall of 84.0% and a precision of 67.3% of exact synset matches on our test corpus, where the gold standard has a reported inter-annotator agreement of 78.6%. Dan Bikel |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 1999 | An Algorithm that Learns What's in a Name
Dan Bikel, Richard M. Schwartz, Ralph M. Weischedel |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |